"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
Datesfat Chicks wrote
Rod Speed wrote

I do know that medical data obtained using unacceptable involuntary
medical experiments during that era have essentially been excluded.

No it hasnt.

http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/NaziMedEx.html

QUOTE: Pozos' plan to republish the Nazi data in the New England
Journal of Medicine was flatly vetoed by the Journal's editor, Doctor
Arnold Relman.15 Relman's refusal to publish Nazi data along with
Pozos' comments was understandable given the source of the Nazi data and
the way it was obtained.

Says nothing useful about the rest of the medical data that hasnt been
excluded.

My understanding--and I'm not much of an Internet searcher--
is that consensus of the medical community was to exclude it.

You're wrong.

I didn't even know it was available.

Corse it is.

I clearly don't understand the issue very well ... please let me know
where I'm wrong.

Basically it hasnt been excluded.

The question of the "exclusion" of the music

No one is proposing that.

Not in the same way, no. But censorship is nearly equivalent to
exclusion in spirit.

Nope. No one is even proposing all of Wagner's work be
burnt etc or even that it should no longer be buyable either.



The medical data is available. Hard to find, and is extremely frowned upon
to use or quote. Probably enough to derail a career. Which pretty much
excludes it use.