Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:22:47 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

More ignorant bull**** from SW Tom.

Right - more ignorant bull**** from the biggest bull****ter in the
newsgroup.

I know because I've been there - twice with two kids and my own
education.

I'll say it again - what you know about anything can be written on the
tip of a sewing needle with a broad tip Sharpie - or what you can
Google up.

And I thought your wife was already a Dr. Dr.


So did he.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:57:59 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:21:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch penned the
following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|With all the consideration of the govt being the party that sets
|medical prices at Canadian levels, who will pay for the R&D? Most R&D
|for med stuff is done in the USA because we pay for it and essentially
|the USA subsidizes Canadian medicine because they do NOT pay for the
|R&D, US citizens do. The govt will not pay for it and are not even
|qualified to do so. Most advances in medicine and drugs over the last
|50 years would never have been funded by the govt. I know from
|personal experience that govt experts rarely know enough about what
|really works.
|Most medical R&D is funded by pvt companies who know they will make
|money if the process works. If they cannot make a profit, no more
|R&D, no advances in treatments, no new drugs.

The obvious answer to your question has a lot to do with (I hope) the
end of the Americans subsidizing everybody all over the globe through
inflated prices and taxes designed to do just that....

Indeed. We pay for the R&D now. The rest of the world gets far
better pricing for what we fund.

H the K wrote:
..
I taught freshman English for two semesters, and I didn't even have a
master's degree at the time.

Damn, I thought U of Kansas was a bad school, but I can't believe they
would allow an undergrad teach classes. Says a lot about Harry's
education.


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:10:34 -0400, Just Regigie
wrote:

H the K wrote:
.
I taught freshman English for two semesters, and I didn't even have a
master's degree at the time.

Damn, I thought U of Kansas was a bad school, but I can't believe they
would allow an undergrad teach classes. Says a lot about Harry's
education.

Did you ever notice that Harry has pretty much done every job that
eveyrone has done in the newsgroup and knows much more about it than
the person who does it?

That's one hell of a life he's had huh?

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:10:34 -0400, Just Regigie
wrote:

H the K wrote:
.
I taught freshman English for two semesters, and I didn't even have a
master's degree at the time.
Damn, I thought U of Kansas was a bad school, but I can't believe they
would allow an undergrad teach classes. Says a lot about Harry's
education.

Did you ever notice that Harry has pretty much done every job that
eveyrone has done in the newsgroup and knows much more about it than
the person who does it?

That's one hell of a life he's had huh?

I was smart enough not to join the marine corps, moron.



--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.

Just Regigie wrote:
H the K wrote:
.
I taught freshman English for two semesters, and I didn't even have a
master's degree at the time.

Damn, I thought U of Kansas was a bad school, but I can't believe they
would allow an undergrad teach classes. Says a lot about Harry's
education.



Harry's lies just keep getting more bizarre and unbelievable!

On Jul 24, 9:09*am, NotNow wrote:
Just Regigie wrote:
H the K wrote:
.
I taught freshman English for two semesters, and I didn't even have a
master's degree at the time.

Damn, I thought U of Kansas was a bad school, but I can't believe they
would allow an undergrad teach classes. * Says a lot about Harry's
education.

Harry's lies just keep getting more bizarre and unbelievable!

My boss at my previous job was a Marine Corps Colonel (Res) with a PhD
in physics. Under Bush 1, he was the Marine Corps nuke weapons expert
and advised the JCS during Gulf War 1, not exactly a stupid man.
During my time doing defense work, I met some of the smartest people I
have ever known, all members of the military.

H the K wrote:

You know? What you know is not "universally accepted knowledge."
In the last two months, you've made a number of factual announcements
here that are absolute provable bull****. Remember your claims about
Husqvarna tractors? Bull****. You claims about the fuel burns on your
etec? Bull****.


SW Tom may make a mistake or two. That's very different then the foul
amount of lies you've attempted to perpetrate on folks here.

Aw, po widdle krause. You actually told the truth about a tractor, and
no one believed you?

And speaking about absolute provable bull****, you've now admitted in
this thread that your wife was not a Dr. Dr., despite having claimed so
some years ago. No one believed you when you said it.

Johnson

Johnson wrote:
H the K wrote:

You know? What you know is not "universally accepted knowledge."
In the last two months, you've made a number of factual announcements
here that are absolute provable bull****. Remember your claims about
Husqvarna tractors? Bull****. You claims about the fuel burns on your
etec? Bull****.


SW Tom may make a mistake or two. That's very different then the foul
amount of lies you've attempted to perpetrate on folks here.

Aw, po widdle krause. You actually told the truth about a tractor, and
no one believed you?

And speaking about absolute provable bull****, you've now admitted in
this thread that your wife was not a Dr. Dr., despite having claimed so
some years ago. No one believed you when you said it.

Johnson

Hell, I don't believe his new claim about his wife, either! And notice
if you will, he's never, ever tried to defend his idiotic lie about his
father's fireboat welcome.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 7/23/09 5:38 PM, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:22:47 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
.. Dr.


You know? What you know is not "universally accepted knowledge."
In the last two months, you've made a number of factual announcements here
that are absolute provable bull****. Remember your claims about Husqvarna
tractors? Bull****. You claims about the fuel burns on your etec?
Bull****.


There's a big difference between making a mistake, and telling outright
lies. You have ONE example of Tom making a mistake, and it's about a stupid
tractor. You will continue to regurgitate that until you die, trying to
prove your superiority. You on the otherhand are incapable of telling the
truth. You've been outed on so many lies, that it's impossible to keep
track. All you are capable of doing is posting other people's work on this
newsgroup, lying, or throwing 3rd grade insults at folks. You have no
legitimate purpose being here.

--Mike