Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:36:35 -0500, thunder wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:03:05 -0400, Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote: Harry is "special". He's exempt from both Federal and State laws regarding these issues. You know, I'm sure those clauses will be abused, and I really don't like the sound of some of it, but these days, having a living will is as prudent as having a regular will. Most of us find it uncomfortable talking about death, but your loved ones do need to know your wishes about "pulling the plug". I'm not uncomfortable about it at all - I have a living will and very specific instructions should I become incapacitated or unable to make the decision on my own due to mental incapacity (save the jokes). What bothers me is this ever growing intrusion into your personal life by people who have no business being in it. In both MA and CT it's almost as if they are trying to find something for their Social Workers to do so they keep adding to the list. Seriously, one of the questions is "do you feel safe". Ok, being the jerk I am, my immediate response "No - the chances of obtaining a terminal staph infection in your hospital are about 200% greater than getting one at my home." But it makes the point loud and clear. :) When you visit your hospital, you are questioned by a social worker? Really? -- A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:57:58 -0400, Just Regigie
wrote: Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:06:35 -0400, Just Regigie wrote: H the K wrote: Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:56:18 -0500, thunder wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:32:36 -0400, Captain Yogi of Woodstock wrote: Here's another interesting piece of Obamaca ".... we should be very troubled by Section 1233 of H.R. 3200. The section, titled ?Advanced Care Planning Consultation? requires senior citizens to meet at least every 5 years with a doctor or nurse practitioner to discuss dying with dignity." Screw you Obama. Help me out here, Sec 1233 of H.R. 3200 concerns Bulk Transfers. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.3200: There is, however, proposed amendments to the Social Security Act that discuss living wills, powers of attorneys, and such. We haven't yet reached Soylent Green. The clauses I'm sure you are referring to start on page 425, he http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/1...cations/AAHCA- BillText-071409.pdf Nope. Sorry, had the wrong link. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...00ih.t xt.pdf Pages 424/425. It stops just short of euthanasia. And frankly, I don't want to be preached at by some "health care worker" about the value of "just letting go". I get enough of that crap every time I go to a specialist - Do you feel safe - has anybody threatened you - blah, blah, blah. Gee, I'm older than you are and none of the medical folks I ever see ask those sorts of questions. Do you look frail? In many states it is the hospital and/or doctor's responsibility to ask that question, and it is one of the first questions nurses asks of all new patients. Harry is "special". He's exempt from both Federal and State laws regarding these issues. I took my mother in law to the hospital because she had cut her leg on the car door. Because it was such a deep and long cut, they must have asked her that question at least 5 times. I took my wife (age 48) into the emergency room for pneumonia last year, and it was one of the first questions they asked. The only thing that surprised me, was they asked the question in front of me. If I was really abusing her, they should be asking it discreetly without anyone else around. The laws are designed to ferret out domestic abuse or elder abuse. And despite being annoyed by all this, I'm ok with it. I understand why they ask these questions because they are covering their corporate asses from being sued as the abuse reporting requirements are so stringent. But it keeps getting longer and longer and goes into areas where they dont' need to be. |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:54:09 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously, one of the questions is "do you feel safe". Perhaps, they are looking for cases of elderly abuse. It seems to be prevalent. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:36:35 -0500, thunder wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:03:05 -0400, Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote: Harry is "special". He's exempt from both Federal and State laws regarding these issues. You know, I'm sure those clauses will be abused, and I really don't like the sound of some of it, but these days, having a living will is as prudent as having a regular will. Most of us find it uncomfortable talking about death, but your loved ones do need to know your wishes about "pulling the plug". I'm not uncomfortable about it at all - I have a living will and very specific instructions should I become incapacitated or unable to make the decision on my own due to mental incapacity (save the jokes). What bothers me is this ever growing intrusion into your personal life by people who have no business being in it. In both MA and CT it's almost as if they are trying to find something for their Social Workers to do so they keep adding to the list. Seriously, one of the questions is "do you feel safe". Ok, being the jerk I am, my immediate response "No - the chances of obtaining a terminal staph infection in your hospital are about 200% greater than getting one at my home." But it makes the point loud and clear. :) When you visit your hospital, you are questioned by a social worker? Really? Social worker employment act. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:36:35 -0500, thunder wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:03:05 -0400, Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote: Harry is "special". He's exempt from both Federal and State laws regarding these issues. You know, I'm sure those clauses will be abused, and I really don't like the sound of some of it, but these days, having a living will is as prudent as having a regular will. Most of us find it uncomfortable talking about death, but your loved ones do need to know your wishes about "pulling the plug". I'm not uncomfortable about it at all - I have a living will and very specific instructions should I become incapacitated or unable to make the decision on my own due to mental incapacity (save the jokes). What bothers me is this ever growing intrusion into your personal life by people who have no business being in it. In both MA and CT it's almost as if they are trying to find something for their Social Workers to do so they keep adding to the list. Seriously, one of the questions is "do you feel safe". Ok, being the jerk I am, my immediate response "No - the chances of obtaining a terminal staph infection in your hospital are about 200% greater than getting one at my home." But it makes the point loud and clear. :) When you visit your hospital, you are questioned by a social worker? Really? When my mother broke her neck, a social worker came by to review her situation for "after care". This is standard operating procedure. They reviewed her home situation to make sure someone would be able to help her with her rehab and make sure she/and I understood all options available. One of the first questions the front desk asks when you visit a hospital for any kind of procedure is "do you have a living will". They not only want to know if you have a living will, but most will recommend you give the hospital a copy so they have it on record in case they have to make a decision when a family member is not available. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
H the K wrote:
thunder wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:32:36 -0400, Captain Yogi of Woodstock wrote: Here's another interesting piece of Obamaca ".... we should be very troubled by Section 1233 of H.R. 3200. The section, titled “Advanced Care Planning Consultation” requires senior citizens to meet at least every 5 years with a doctor or nurse practitioner to discuss dying with dignity." Screw you Obama. Help me out here, Sec 1233 of H.R. 3200 concerns Bulk Transfers. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.3200: There is, however, proposed amendments to the Social Security Act that discuss living wills, powers of attorneys, and such. We haven't yet reached Soylent Green. The clauses I'm sure you are referring to start on page 425, he http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/1...cations/AAHCA- BillText-071409.pdf There's no way SW Tom will die with dignity. Seriously, though, SW Tom has become or perhaps always was just another right-wing "we can't fix that, do that, improve that" Republican who goal it is to stymie Obama anyway he can. Improving society or making life a bit easy for the disadvantaged...no concern of his. Why fix what isn't broken. Your alleged improvements to society are at the expense of individual liberty. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yogi of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:57:58 -0400, Just Regigie wrote: Captain Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:06:35 -0400, Just Regigie wrote: H the K wrote: Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:56:18 -0500, thunder wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:32:36 -0400, Captain Yogi of Woodstock wrote: Here's another interesting piece of Obamaca ".... we should be very troubled by Section 1233 of H.R. 3200. The section, titled ?Advanced Care Planning Consultation? requires senior citizens to meet at least every 5 years with a doctor or nurse practitioner to discuss dying with dignity." Screw you Obama. Help me out here, Sec 1233 of H.R. 3200 concerns Bulk Transfers. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.3200: There is, however, proposed amendments to the Social Security Act that discuss living wills, powers of attorneys, and such. We haven't yet reached Soylent Green. The clauses I'm sure you are referring to start on page 425, he http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/1...cations/AAHCA- BillText-071409.pdf Nope. Sorry, had the wrong link. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...00ih.t xt.pdf Pages 424/425. It stops just short of euthanasia. And frankly, I don't want to be preached at by some "health care worker" about the value of "just letting go". I get enough of that crap every time I go to a specialist - Do you feel safe - has anybody threatened you - blah, blah, blah. Gee, I'm older than you are and none of the medical folks I ever see ask those sorts of questions. Do you look frail? In many states it is the hospital and/or doctor's responsibility to ask that question, and it is one of the first questions nurses asks of all new patients. Harry is "special". He's exempt from both Federal and State laws regarding these issues. I took my mother in law to the hospital because she had cut her leg on the car door. Because it was such a deep and long cut, they must have asked her that question at least 5 times. I took my wife (age 48) into the emergency room for pneumonia last year, and it was one of the first questions they asked. The only thing that surprised me, was they asked the question in front of me. If I was really abusing her, they should be asking it discreetly without anyone else around. The laws are designed to ferret out domestic abuse or elder abuse. And despite being annoyed by all this, I'm ok with it. I understand why they ask these questions because they are covering their corporate asses from being sued as the abuse reporting requirements are so stringent. But it keeps getting longer and longer and goes into areas where they dont' need to be. I am sure they took at look at you and KNEW you were the one doing the abusing. ![]() -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yogi of Woodstock" wrote in message ... The laws are designed to ferret out domestic abuse or elder abuse. And despite being annoyed by all this, I'm ok with it. I understand why they ask these questions because they are covering their corporate asses from being sued as the abuse reporting requirements are so stringent. But it keeps getting longer and longer and goes into areas where they dont' need to be. Years ago my nephew caught a hook in the earlobe while fishing with his father. They took him to the emergency room. DSS was called in. They thought the kid was being used as a target while practicing casting. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
is this dead or what? | General | |||
He's Dead, Jim. | ASA | |||
Is he dead....? | ASA | |||
Dead... | General | |||
Our Hero is Dead, Dead, Dead | General |