![]() |
Sober thoughts on health care
|
Sober thoughts on health care
wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:30:15 -0400, H the K wrote: wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:54:34 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Ah... it sounded like you were complaining about the high cost of insurance. But now I understand that you're both "retired", with your wife choosing to work at a basic job where the insurance cost 25% of her pay. Nothing wrong with that. No, my wife is 17 years younger than me and will be working for a long time yet, insurance or not. And she's the highest paid in her unit except for the manager. The rest there can't afford the insurance, so they go to the e-room for everything. That's the problem. The high cost of health care/insurance. There ain't no free lunch except the one those paying for health insurance are buying for the others. Whether I complain about it or not, you may have noticed that others are. I agree that the people who choose to not insure, then use the emergency room for free health care is a problem. However, if you're rooting for national health care so your wife can quit work and I'll have to pick up your health care tab... well, I have a problem with that. Tell me your problem with paying my SS and I'll shed a couple tears. My problem isn't with paying, it's with a system that only *some* pay into, and a system that locks people into jobs because health insurance isn't universally available and portable. Stifles and puts artificial constraints into movement in the job market, and gives foreigners a competitive edge in trade. --Vic Part of our high costs are the E room. I had a toothache while in Sorrento, Italy. A Saturday and no dentist working. I was told to go to the local hospital and go to the "Pronto Soccorso" entrance. Happens to be free to everyone, foreign, locals etc. Was like a walk in doctors office. There were people there with hurting ankle, etc. Had a Doctor, nurse & aid and clerk. No big tests, no major equipment. If you needed more, they sent you to the hospital, where I would have had to pay. Much cheaper setup than our E rooms and Urgent Care clinics. I guess if you could get it by the Doctopr/Nurse union the government could cut a lot of this off at the pass by opening store front "Quack in the box" operations in the places where poor people live. They could staff it with military or ex-military medical people when they stop the war. My niece was a navy Corpsman for 12 years. If she can treat the aches and pains of a ship full of sailors or save a Marine with a sucking chest wound, there is not much in the ghetto she can't handle. Unfortunately they want her to go to another 4 year course before she can give someone, stateside, a shot. And I thought we were over "separate and unequal." I wouldn't see a non-physician or nurse practitioner for a medical issue. Why should a poor person? The nurses who draw my blood for tests or give me a flu shot, et cetera, are college graduate nurses who have passed board exams, are licensed, and required to continue their educations during their professional life. Government medicine will never be equal to what Bill Gates gets. If we actually try to make that true we will certainly be broke very quickly. That is the biggest flaw in this program. . Steve Jobs seemed to have no problem getting a new liver. As one that was *almost* placed on the liver transplant list I do know a little about how UNOS works. |
Sober thoughts on health care
Calif Bill wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:54:34 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Ah... it sounded like you were complaining about the high cost of insurance. But now I understand that you're both "retired", with your wife choosing to work at a basic job where the insurance cost 25% of her pay. Nothing wrong with that. No, my wife is 17 years younger than me and will be working for a long time yet, insurance or not. And she's the highest paid in her unit except for the manager. The rest there can't afford the insurance, so they go to the e-room for everything. That's the problem. The high cost of health care/insurance. There ain't no free lunch except the one those paying for health insurance are buying for the others. Whether I complain about it or not, you may have noticed that others are. I agree that the people who choose to not insure, then use the emergency room for free health care is a problem. However, if you're rooting for national health care so your wife can quit work and I'll have to pick up your health care tab... well, I have a problem with that. Tell me your problem with paying my SS and I'll shed a couple tears. My problem isn't with paying, it's with a system that only *some* pay into, and a system that locks people into jobs because health insurance isn't universally available and portable. Stifles and puts artificial constraints into movement in the job market, and gives foreigners a competitive edge in trade. --Vic Part of our high costs are the E room. I had a toothache while in Sorrento, Italy. A Saturday and no dentist working. I was told to go to the local hospital and go to the "Pronto Soccorso" entrance. Happens to be free to everyone, foreign, locals etc. Was like a walk in doctors office. There were people there with hurting ankle, etc. Had a Doctor, nurse & aid and clerk. No big tests, no major equipment. If you needed more, they sent you to the hospital, where I would have had to pay. Much cheaper setup than our E rooms and Urgent Care clinics. I guess if you could get it by the Doctopr/Nurse union the government could cut a lot of this off at the pass by opening store front "Quack in the box" operations in the places where poor people live. They could staff it with military or ex-military medical people when they stop the war. My niece was a navy Corpsman for 12 years. If she can treat the aches and pains of a ship full of sailors or save a Marine with a sucking chest wound, there is not much in the ghetto she can't handle. Unfortunately they want her to go to another 4 year course before she can give someone, stateside, a shot. And I thought we were over "separate and unequal." I wouldn't see a non-physician or nurse practitioner for a medical issue. Why should a poor person? The nurses who draw my blood for tests or give me a flu shot, et cetera, are college graduate nurses who have passed board exams, are licensed, and required to continue their educations during their professional life. You may know about Maryland gun laws, but you know little about the medical world. Rare is it an RN taking blood for your tests. They are normally a phlebotomist. 4-8 months course. Sorry, the nurses at my doctor's office are RN's or Nurse Practitioners. Says so on their badges, on the office directories, on the diplomas hanging on the walls of the various offices. |
Sober thoughts on health care
|
Sober thoughts on health care
"H the K" wrote in message ... wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:06:58 -0400, H the K wrote: "Stabilization" nonsense is especially true for poor people suffering from serious mental health issues or drug addiction. A hospital with facilities for treating either (and not all hospitals do), might take a suicidal person in for a couple of days and then, if that person says he is not feeling like killing himself at that moment, he is discharged. Of course, the next day he might feel suicidal again, and kill himself. Statistically Truly "suicidal" people end up killing themselves at about the same rate, no matter how much "treatment" they get. About all "treatment" does is separate "gestures" from "attempts" and treat those who make gestures, with no intent of actually killing themselves. I had no idea you were an accomplished mental health researcher. So what's your point...just leave the potential suicides by the side of the road? Put a diving board on the high bridge. So they land in a designated area. |
Sober thoughts on health care
"H the K" wrote in message m... Calif Bill wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:54:34 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Ah... it sounded like you were complaining about the high cost of insurance. But now I understand that you're both "retired", with your wife choosing to work at a basic job where the insurance cost 25% of her pay. Nothing wrong with that. No, my wife is 17 years younger than me and will be working for a long time yet, insurance or not. And she's the highest paid in her unit except for the manager. The rest there can't afford the insurance, so they go to the e-room for everything. That's the problem. The high cost of health care/insurance. There ain't no free lunch except the one those paying for health insurance are buying for the others. Whether I complain about it or not, you may have noticed that others are. I agree that the people who choose to not insure, then use the emergency room for free health care is a problem. However, if you're rooting for national health care so your wife can quit work and I'll have to pick up your health care tab... well, I have a problem with that. Tell me your problem with paying my SS and I'll shed a couple tears. My problem isn't with paying, it's with a system that only *some* pay into, and a system that locks people into jobs because health insurance isn't universally available and portable. Stifles and puts artificial constraints into movement in the job market, and gives foreigners a competitive edge in trade. --Vic Part of our high costs are the E room. I had a toothache while in Sorrento, Italy. A Saturday and no dentist working. I was told to go to the local hospital and go to the "Pronto Soccorso" entrance. Happens to be free to everyone, foreign, locals etc. Was like a walk in doctors office. There were people there with hurting ankle, etc. Had a Doctor, nurse & aid and clerk. No big tests, no major equipment. If you needed more, they sent you to the hospital, where I would have had to pay. Much cheaper setup than our E rooms and Urgent Care clinics. I guess if you could get it by the Doctopr/Nurse union the government could cut a lot of this off at the pass by opening store front "Quack in the box" operations in the places where poor people live. They could staff it with military or ex-military medical people when they stop the war. My niece was a navy Corpsman for 12 years. If she can treat the aches and pains of a ship full of sailors or save a Marine with a sucking chest wound, there is not much in the ghetto she can't handle. Unfortunately they want her to go to another 4 year course before she can give someone, stateside, a shot. And I thought we were over "separate and unequal." I wouldn't see a non-physician or nurse practitioner for a medical issue. Why should a poor person? The nurses who draw my blood for tests or give me a flu shot, et cetera, are college graduate nurses who have passed board exams, are licensed, and required to continue their educations during their professional life. You may know about Maryland gun laws, but you know little about the medical world. Rare is it an RN taking blood for your tests. They are normally a phlebotomist. 4-8 months course. Sorry, the nurses at my doctor's office are RN's or Nurse Practitioners. Says so on their badges, on the office directories, on the diplomas hanging on the walls of the various offices. And they send you to Quest Diagnostics to get the blood tests, etc. |
Sober thoughts on health care
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0400, H the K wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:03:02 -0400, BAR wrote: I thought they weren't allowed to deny you care if you couldn't or wouldn't pay for it. Yeah, but what is care? It may vary by state, but I believe they only have to stabilize you. That is correct...if that. It's also true that many hospitals go beyond the requirement, regardless of the cost. Still, I wouldn't want to be in an emergency room without insurance. Hell, even with insurance, a major sickness is a leading cause of personal bankruptcy. |
Sober thoughts on health care
"thunder" wrote in message t... It's also true that many hospitals go beyond the requirement, regardless of the cost. Still, I wouldn't want to be in an emergency room without insurance. Hell, even with insurance, a major sickness is a leading cause of personal bankruptcy. You've touched on the forbidden facet of health care. At what point is someone's life worth destroying the lives of loved ones by putting them in hopeless debt or bankrupcy? Eisboch |
Sober thoughts on health care
Calif Bill wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... Calif Bill wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:54:34 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Ah... it sounded like you were complaining about the high cost of insurance. But now I understand that you're both "retired", with your wife choosing to work at a basic job where the insurance cost 25% of her pay. Nothing wrong with that. No, my wife is 17 years younger than me and will be working for a long time yet, insurance or not. And she's the highest paid in her unit except for the manager. The rest there can't afford the insurance, so they go to the e-room for everything. That's the problem. The high cost of health care/insurance. There ain't no free lunch except the one those paying for health insurance are buying for the others. Whether I complain about it or not, you may have noticed that others are. I agree that the people who choose to not insure, then use the emergency room for free health care is a problem. However, if you're rooting for national health care so your wife can quit work and I'll have to pick up your health care tab... well, I have a problem with that. Tell me your problem with paying my SS and I'll shed a couple tears. My problem isn't with paying, it's with a system that only *some* pay into, and a system that locks people into jobs because health insurance isn't universally available and portable. Stifles and puts artificial constraints into movement in the job market, and gives foreigners a competitive edge in trade. --Vic Part of our high costs are the E room. I had a toothache while in Sorrento, Italy. A Saturday and no dentist working. I was told to go to the local hospital and go to the "Pronto Soccorso" entrance. Happens to be free to everyone, foreign, locals etc. Was like a walk in doctors office. There were people there with hurting ankle, etc. Had a Doctor, nurse & aid and clerk. No big tests, no major equipment. If you needed more, they sent you to the hospital, where I would have had to pay. Much cheaper setup than our E rooms and Urgent Care clinics. I guess if you could get it by the Doctopr/Nurse union the government could cut a lot of this off at the pass by opening store front "Quack in the box" operations in the places where poor people live. They could staff it with military or ex-military medical people when they stop the war. My niece was a navy Corpsman for 12 years. If she can treat the aches and pains of a ship full of sailors or save a Marine with a sucking chest wound, there is not much in the ghetto she can't handle. Unfortunately they want her to go to another 4 year course before she can give someone, stateside, a shot. And I thought we were over "separate and unequal." I wouldn't see a non-physician or nurse practitioner for a medical issue. Why should a poor person? The nurses who draw my blood for tests or give me a flu shot, et cetera, are college graduate nurses who have passed board exams, are licensed, and required to continue their educations during their professional life. You may know about Maryland gun laws, but you know little about the medical world. Rare is it an RN taking blood for your tests. They are normally a phlebotomist. 4-8 months course. Sorry, the nurses at my doctor's office are RN's or Nurse Practitioners. Says so on their badges, on the office directories, on the diplomas hanging on the walls of the various offices. And they send you to Quest Diagnostics to get the blood tests, etc. They don't send me anywhere for blood tests; the nurses draw the blood. I have no idea who does their blood testing for them, though. You and BAR don't seem to get much right...right-wingedness? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com