Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 15, 6:48*am, J i m wrote:
Captain Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:55:03 -0500, thunder wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:22:35 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: more oil than the entire Persian Gulf combined. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 This has been speculated about for years, but it's finally coming together. Oddly, there is a similar field off the coast of New Jersey at about the same depth but it hasn't been explored. Interesting. You know, Tom, production has never been our problem. *IIRC, we are still the third largest petroleum producer. *It's our insatiable appetite. * Without addressing that appetite, there won't be any magical production bullet. *This country has been the most prospected country on the planet. *We know where the oil is, it's a matter of recovery. *Hell, that Bakken Formation was discovered in the early fifties, but the recovery technologies (horizontal drilling) is relatively recent. *Even now, the technically recoverable oil from that formation, @ 4 billion barrels, would only last us about eight months. Directional drilling has been around since the '40s when Sperry developed the gyroscope during the war and that technology was applied to drilling. *That technology was improved on in the early '70s with mud motors (I was actually on the first test bore - Texaco #5 in the Gulf). The more recent innovation that I'm familiar with is Auto Trek with the Quantec bits built by Baker/Hughes. My point is that the field is bigger and more accessible than previously thought - plus there seems to be a companion field close to it and the Canadian fields look to have a similar configuration. If we have the technology and we can access this supply while we build our "renewable" future and slowly reduce our dependence on fossil fuels while keeping prices low and buying time to build a more efficient transmission system (Smart Grid) with more environmentally friendly energy sources, why not do it? This rush to IMMEDIATELY stop thinking about our own supplies of fossil fuels and change to hopefully new sources is silly. Hope and change is silly? Why that's un American. Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? You want a second opinion? I'm here. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
On Jul 15, 6:48 am, J i m wrote: Captain Yogi of Woodstock wrote: On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:55:03 -0500, thunder wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:22:35 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: more oil than the entire Persian Gulf combined. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 This has been speculated about for years, but it's finally coming together. Oddly, there is a similar field off the coast of New Jersey at about the same depth but it hasn't been explored. Interesting. You know, Tom, production has never been our problem. IIRC, we are still the third largest petroleum producer. It's our insatiable appetite. Without addressing that appetite, there won't be any magical production bullet. This country has been the most prospected country on the planet. We know where the oil is, it's a matter of recovery. Hell, that Bakken Formation was discovered in the early fifties, but the recovery technologies (horizontal drilling) is relatively recent. Even now, the technically recoverable oil from that formation, @ 4 billion barrels, would only last us about eight months. Directional drilling has been around since the '40s when Sperry developed the gyroscope during the war and that technology was applied to drilling. That technology was improved on in the early '70s with mud motors (I was actually on the first test bore - Texaco #5 in the Gulf). The more recent innovation that I'm familiar with is Auto Trek with the Quantec bits built by Baker/Hughes. My point is that the field is bigger and more accessible than previously thought - plus there seems to be a companion field close to it and the Canadian fields look to have a similar configuration. If we have the technology and we can access this supply while we build our "renewable" future and slowly reduce our dependence on fossil fuels while keeping prices low and buying time to build a more efficient transmission system (Smart Grid) with more environmentally friendly energy sources, why not do it? This rush to IMMEDIATELY stop thinking about our own supplies of fossil fuels and change to hopefully new sources is silly. Hope and change is silly? Why that's un American. Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? You want a second opinion? I'm here. OK |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "J i m" wrote in message ... Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? Geeze, don't blow it. Some people don't know about some things and will believe anything you tell them. Like I said .... for you, $1,200.00 And it's spelled, "Balladeer" with two "e's". But keep it quiet, will ya? Everyone will want one. Eisboch |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"J i m" wrote in message ... Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? Geeze, don't blow it. Some people don't know about some things and will believe anything you tell them. Like I said .... for you, $1,200.00 And it's spelled, "Balladeer" with two "e's". But keep it quiet, will ya? Everyone will want one. Eisboch No offense, but when I'm about to make a big investment in anything, I need to check it out. The fact that you have collected six of these babys leads me to believe it's probably a good investment, but I gotta be sure. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"J i m" wrote in message ... Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? Geeze, don't blow it. Some people don't know about some things and will believe anything you tell them. Like I said .... for you, $1,200.00 And it's spelled, "Balladeer" with two "e's". But keep it quiet, will ya? Everyone will want one. Eisboch Pretty cheap for a boat...what size outboard? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"J i m" wrote in message ... Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? Geeze, don't blow it. Some people don't know about some things and will believe anything you tell them. Like I said .... for you, $1,200.00 And it's spelled, "Balladeer" with two "e's". But keep it quiet, will ya? Everyone will want one. Eisboch Eisboch, what year is it? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:18:09 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "J i m" wrote in message ... Eisboch has recently acquired a guitar of investment quality that he is willing to sell me at a very attractive price. When I get more info on it, can I email you and solicit your opinion? Geeze, don't blow it. Some people don't know about some things and will believe anything you tell them. Like I said .... for you, $1,200.00 And it's spelled, "Balladeer" with two "e's". But keep it quiet, will ya? Everyone will want one. I KNEW IT!! :) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:51:00 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:22:35 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: more oil than the entire Persian Gulf combined. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 This has been speculated about for years, but it's finally coming together. Oddly, there is a similar field off the coast of New Jersey at about the same depth but it hasn't been explored. Interesting. I am dutifully skeptical.... but I sure hope it is true..... It's very interesting. They've been talking about the potential of this shale/sand field for years, then they discovered the dome under it and from what I've been reading it's massive. Then the second field started coming on line and it's the same size. They think that a similar field might be under the Canadian shale/sand field too - that would be huge. I'm still waiting for them to look into the New Jersey situation - that has also been talked about for years, but nobody has permission to do any exploration. Boone Pickens has stated that according to his estimates, there's enough natural gas held in the mid-Missouri shale for at least 50 years of use. Be nice if it were true. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 11:09*pm, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:51:00 -0400, Gene wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:22:35 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: more oil than the entire Persian Gulf combined. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 This has been speculated about for years, but it's finally coming together. Oddly, there is a similar field off the coast of New Jersey at about the same depth but it hasn't been explored. Interesting. I am dutifully skeptical.... but I sure hope it is true..... It's very interesting. They've been talking about the potential of this shale/sand field for years, then they discovered the dome under it and from what I've been reading it's massive. *Then the second field started coming on line and it's the same size. They think that a similar field might be under the Canadian shale/sand field too - that would be huge. I'm still waiting for them to look into the New Jersey situation - that has also been talked about for years, but nobody has permission to do any exploration. Boone Pickens has stated that according to his estimates, there's enough natural gas held in the mid-Missouri shale for at least 50 years of use. Be nice if it were true. They think that a similar field might be under the Canadian shale/ sand field too - that would be huge. Ummm, we've already tapped the Tar Sands.... |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:15:12 -0400, wrote:
It figures they would find another 50 years of oil, just about the time they say we are not allowed to burn it anymore. ROTFL!!! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sitting in the bar... | General | |||
While I'm sitting here killing time... | General | |||
this boat has been sitting | General | |||
22' Godfrey sweetwater not sitting right | Cruising | |||
Sitting on my mooring. | ASA |