Zombie of Woodstock wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:58:45 -0400, HK wrote:

"Any refusal to dispense -- regardless of whether it is motivated by
religion, morals, conscience, ethics, discriminatory prejudices, or
personal distaste for a patient -- violates the rules," the panel said.

This ruling overturned the temporary injunction sought by the
pharmacy, and is not a ruling on the case itself, which proceeds in
district court. I believe the ruling can be appealed to attempt to
reinstate the injunction, and I hope it is.

The most overturned appellate court has teed up another case for the
Supreme Court to consider — and likely soon.

Moron. Learn to read something other than KOS.


Duh...I understand how the federal court system works, moron.

With a bit of luck, over the next seven years a couple of the righties
on the Supremes will retire or FOAD, and we'll be able to wrest that
court away from big business, the war merchants, and the religious nutcases.