Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:02:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Jul 8, 6:13*pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=3530 The article indicates this fisherman caught some heat for bringing it home. The boat captain said it was the fisherman's choice. Seems to me the captain gets to set the rules. ???? --Vic It would have been more "manly" to let it go...alive. ""It's wonderful news to hear of the existence of large breeding animals, but from a conservation point of view, it was a shame the shark was not released alive." what was he supposed to do? release it when it's dead? I think it should have gone to market and fed a lot of people. People eat fish, including sharks, even biggun's That's not he only fresh water shark in existance. Not the point. That fish was most likely a female and most likely still breeding. You want to keep fish like that in the water and producing more little fishies. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kong Scarab Helmet Visor | Touring | |||
Why the Law of the Sea has to be the Law of the Jungle? | General | |||
Why the Law of the Sea has to be the Law of the Jungle? | Touring | |||
Why the Law of the Sea has to be the Law of the Jungle? | UK Paddle | |||
Hong Kong Sail? | ASA |