"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...

Also Sprach JPS.

Oh great critic,

One main difference's between he an you, is that Richard's business's
work.

--------------------------

Not always, but I am not afraid of trying new things or ideas.

Generally I get an "entertainment value only" kick out of jps. He seems so
...... unhappy and frustrated for being so enlightened and worldly.

Not to draw comparisons, but I think a review of our respective posts over
time would reveal the following to all but the most oblivious observer.

1. I tend to be much more tolerant of the beliefs and opinions of others,
even if I don't personally
subscribe to them. Somehow to jps, that means I am a knuckle dragging
right-wing neocon.

2. I don't take out my frustrations on inanimate objects like a TV set by
pulling a nutty, screaming
gutter talk profanities at it in front of young children. To jps,
that means I am a ardent Cheney
supporter.

3. I don't attack his business, his business philosophies, his boat or what
he does for a hobby. I don't
know what he does and really don't care.

4. Having done it, I have respect for those that create and build a
company, including him. To jps, that
means I am a greedy, big business capitalist.

I could go on, but it's not worth the effort. But, I have to ask. Which of
us are better adjusted, rational and "enlightened"?

Eisboch

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:13:33 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...

Also Sprach JPS.

Oh great critic,

One main difference's between he an you, is that Richard's business's
work.

--------------------------

Not always, but I am not afraid of trying new things or ideas.

Generally I get an "entertainment value only" kick out of jps. He seems so
..... unhappy and frustrated for being so enlightened and worldly.

Not to draw comparisons, but I think a review of our respective posts over
time would reveal the following to all but the most oblivious observer.

1. I tend to be much more tolerant of the beliefs and opinions of others,
even if I don't personally
subscribe to them. Somehow to jps, that means I am a knuckle dragging
right-wing neocon.

2. I don't take out my frustrations on inanimate objects like a TV set by
pulling a nutty, screaming
gutter talk profanities at it in front of young children. To jps,
that means I am a ardent Cheney
supporter.

3. I don't attack his business, his business philosophies, his boat or what
he does for a hobby. I don't
know what he does and really don't care.

4. Having done it, I have respect for those that create and build a
company, including him. To jps, that
means I am a greedy, big business capitalist.

I could go on, but it's not worth the effort. But, I have to ask. Which of
us are better adjusted, rational and "enlightened"?

Eisboch

That's a lot of effort for someone who doesn't care.

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:13:33 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...

Also Sprach JPS.

Oh great critic,

One main difference's between he an you, is that Richard's business's
work.

If my business were sold and I were retired, I could tell you about
it. You wouldn't think it unsuccessful.

I don't begrudge Richard his success. He, being a man of personal
responsibility, should be helping others acheive the same
satisfaction.

That's the "conservative" mantra, right? Thousand points of light?

jps wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:13:33 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...

Also Sprach JPS.

Oh great critic,

One main difference's between he an you, is that Richard's business's
work.

If my business were sold and I were retired, I could tell you about
it. You wouldn't think it unsuccessful.

I don't begrudge Richard his success. He, being a man of personal
responsibility, should be helping others acheive the same
satisfaction.

That's the "conservative" mantra, right? Thousand points of light?

If you were successful in life, you would not walk around with a chip on
your shoulder. You and Harry both are failures, and it has you ****ed
off at the world.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects