Eisboch wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:27:57 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


What are you liberals so worried about?
Nothing for nothing, but she is a potential Presidential candidate. I
would expect media coverage of her, especially when she does something as
unusual as resigning in mid-term. As for those 16 ethics complaints, one
of which she filed against herself, they haven't all been without
foundation. She did have to repay moneys for her children's travel. A
minor offense I'll grant you, but most of the complaints are the result
of political infighting in one of our more dysfunctional and corrupt
states. Still, none of this would be news worthy on a national level, if
she wasn't a potential Presidential candidate.

Objectively speaking, I don't personally believe she is qualified to be
POTUS.
But sometimes it takes an earthquake or something to slow the swing of the
pendulum from it's current direction. The faddish momentum currently
enjoyed by some of the extreme left persuasion needs to be slowed a bit and
then brought back to a more moderate position, IMO. She might be the
annoying and frustrating earthquake to accomplish just that.

Meanwhile, it will be fun to watch some people continue their hissy fits as
she makes news everyday.

Eisboch



Some of us are really enjoying her almost daily explosions and
implosions, because they hurt the "Republican brand." Some of us got the
same kick out of Governor Sanford's trials and tribulations for the same
reasons. I don't give a crap about the governor of South Carolina or his
problems, beyond what harm they can cause the GOP.

I guess that's hard for you and others here to understand.

Oh...speaking of Sarah, I suppose she and her lawyer have never heard of
New York Times v. Sullivan. Elected public officials, basically, cannot
use the courts effectively to attempt to chill criticism or reportage
about how they handle their jobs.