BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Marital Bliss (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/107480-marital-bliss.html)

jps July 9th 09 03:08 AM

Marital Bliss
 
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Calif Bill[_2_] July 9th 09 06:32 AM

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax. com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?



jps July 9th 09 07:34 AM

Marital Bliss
 
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax .com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
t.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Calif Bill[_2_] July 9th 09 06:19 PM

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4a x.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
nt.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.



jps July 9th 09 11:24 PM

Marital Bliss
 
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4 ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
ant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Calif Bill[_2_] July 10th 09 06:45 AM

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4a x.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@ 4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
iant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.



jps July 10th 09 06:54 AM

Marital Bliss
 
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.

Tim July 10th 09 08:10 AM

Marital Bliss
 
On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...


That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.


You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?


I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.


Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.


Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?


What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?


It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.


Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.


My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.


I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/

jps July 10th 09 08:51 AM

Marital Bliss
 
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:10:12 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...


That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.


You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?


I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.


Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.


Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?


What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?


It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.


Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.


And how much have we spent in Bosnia?


Too much!


You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.


My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.


Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?


I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.


Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.


I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?


Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.


Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.


I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/


Wrong Hans Christian.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com