Marital Bliss
 

Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

Marital Bliss
 

On Jun 30, 9:04*pm, jps wrote:
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So?

Marital Bliss
 

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 30, 9:04*pm, jps wrote:
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So?

It's hard to overlook this backdrop to his life while he was promoting
his "principaled" approach representing SC.

Marital Bliss
 

On Jul 1, 12:13*am, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
On Jun 30, 9:04*pm, jps wrote:
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So?

It's hard to overlook this backdrop to his life while he was promoting
his "principaled" approach representing SC.

And you are "shocked" to find pols are like that?

Marital Bliss
 

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:29:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jul 1, 12:13*am, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
On Jun 30, 9:04*pm, jps wrote:
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So?

It's hard to overlook this backdrop to his life while he was promoting
his "principaled" approach representing SC.

And you are "shocked" to find pols are like that?

No, not at all. But the folks who voted for him based on his family
values and principled behavior sure must be enjoying the proceedings.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...

Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.


So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women, who
did not work for him.

Marital Bliss
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:13 am, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:36 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
On Jun 30, 9:04 pm, jps wrote:
Evidently not.
Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.
So?
It's hard to overlook this backdrop to his life while he was promoting
his "principaled" approach representing SC.

And you are "shocked" to find pols are like that?


Actually, the more a Republican pol professes his/her piety, "family
values," and dedication to GOP principles, the more likely he or she is
pandering to the simple-minded party base.

As in: "Let's vote for Sanford...he's a god-fearing, christian family
man. We can overlook the fact that he's a flaming asshole."


It warms my cold, cold heart to see these self-righteous "conservative"
assholes take the big fall on issues of "morality" and so disappoint
their constituents.

Marital Bliss
 

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .

Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.


So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women, who
did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Marital Bliss
 

jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women, who
did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Marital Bliss
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

Marital Bliss
 

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.

Marital Bliss
 

On Jul 1, 6:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"





wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
om...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
m...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So? *So did Clinton. *At least Sanford went for a good looking women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? *He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? *Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue..
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, yes he did.. Just like Pelosi, he promised a non-corrupt
whitehouse and lied...

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:ILCdnbXf5P3dJdbXnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink. com...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20 years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.

Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How much as
his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on it.

Marital Bliss
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:ILCdnbXf5P3dJdbXnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink .com...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20
years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.

Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How much
as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on it.


I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning moderate until
I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he showed (and
continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not really talking about
their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike

Marital Bliss
 

"mgg" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:ILCdnbXf5P3dJdbXnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlin k.com...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20
years
of marriage.

So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.

How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?


Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.

Does not matter, they are all scumbags.

When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.

Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How much
as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on it.


I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he showed
(and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not really
talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest of us
do not have to pay for your actions.

Marital Bliss
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20
years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How much
as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he showed
(and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not really
talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest of us
do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.

Marital Bliss
 

BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than
he had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during
20 years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money
on it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning
moderate until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center
when he showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are.
I'm not really talking about their politics either... just their
behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to
pretty much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and
the rest of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.

Marital Bliss
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he
had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20
years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with
staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on
it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he
showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not
really talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest
of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and make
the grandchildren pay for it.

Marital Bliss
 

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:42:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than he
had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during 20
years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with
staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money on
it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he
showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not
really talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest
of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and make
the grandchildren pay for it.

Yeah, we should allow current citizens to die for lack of health care
to save our grandchildren on taxes.

Sounds good Bill.

Where were you when we were spending huge sums in Iraq on nothing?

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:42:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4OmdnZ_Yppx5BNHXnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@earthlink. com...
BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than
he
had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during
20
years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with
staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money
on
it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning
moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he
showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not
really talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to
pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest
of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make
the grandchildren pay for it.

Yeah, we should allow current citizens to die for lack of health care
to save our grandchildren on taxes.

Sounds good Bill.

Where were you when we were spending huge sums in Iraq on nothing?

Same place where I was when the previous occupant of the White House was
spending gobs of money in Bosnia. And how much did we really spend in Iraq?
We will have a military anyway. And upwards of 20-25% of the funding bills
were pork, with no connection to the war.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:42:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4OmdnZ_Yppx5BNHXnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@earthlink. com...
BAR wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:21 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:44 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Evidently not.

Sanford, who also admitted meeting his lover more times than
he
had
previously claimed, told The Associated Press in emotional
interviews
that he "crossed lines" with a handful of other women during
20
years
of marriage.
So? So did Clinton. At least Sanford went for a good looking
women,
who did not work for him.
How do you know that? He's admitted to several over-the-line
relationships, at least some of them might have been with
staffers.

Would you say the same thing for Ensign? Cheating on his wife
with a
staffer's wife who also worked for him?

Can you say flip-flop?

Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of christian marital
virtue.
Ensign and Sanford did.
Does not matter, they are all scumbags.
When you trade on faith and probity, you're owed a special torture
when proven as a skank.

Clinton didn't campaign on nor hold himself out as a maven of
morality.
Sure he did. He promised honesty, and openness in government. How
much as his Bosnia excursion cost us? We are still spending money
on
it.

I love the selective memory of the libs! I was a left leaning
moderate
until I discovered harry... now I'm firmly right of center when he
showed (and continues to show) what idiots the lefties are. I'm not
really talking about their politics either... just their behavior.

--Mike


I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. You are free to
pretty
much do what you want as long as you do not hurt children and the rest
of us do not have to pay for your actions.

You are a libertarian.



There's been a name change...libertarians officially have changed their
name to...


Loonitarians!


All the selfishness of Republicans, with even less responsibility.



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make
the grandchildren pay for it.

Yeah, we should allow current citizens to die for lack of health care
to save our grandchildren on taxes.

Sounds good Bill.



How much of the current excess government spending is going for healthcare?

Marital Bliss
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?

Marital Bliss
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

Marital Bliss
 

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. ..

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.


As is Afghanistan. And Iraq, which we should have left four months
ago.

These aren't Bush's wars any more.
--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until its free!"
--Anonymous

Marital Bliss
 

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. ..

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.. .

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

Marital Bliss
 

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. ..

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

Marital Bliss
 

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
t...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
et...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

Marital Bliss
 

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
. net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax. com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

Marital Bliss
 

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4ax .com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
t.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4a x.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
nt.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.

Marital Bliss
 

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@4 ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
ant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been ****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.

I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Marital Bliss
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax. com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4a x.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini@ 4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
iant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.

I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.

Marital Bliss
 

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...



That sounds more like the current Democrats. All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.


Oh ............. you mean like Bushs' war?


Dem's voted for the war. So is a joint effort. Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. Was a European problem if at all. How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? Percentage wise? 25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. A far
piece
from $3 trillion. And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. Thanks for enlightening me.

I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Wrong. Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.

Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.

Marital Bliss
 

On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...

That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.

Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?

Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.

I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.

Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.

I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/

Marital Bliss
 

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:10:12 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Jul 10, 12:54*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0700, "Calif Bill"



wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:19:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:32:32 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:45:22 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:rdl9559n4p1nm3utolrqun06470mm1m1t4@4ax .com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:29:33 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:seg7559af7mck6nvddgq4o9nhb4u0n82cp@4 ax.com...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:55 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
news:6ias451j4judtgkstderc381ou285jdini @4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:59:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
liant.net...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:PradnR4xDNIfbNHXnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2 ...

That sounds more like the current Democrats. *All the
spending
now
and
make the grandchildren pay for it.

Oh ............. *you mean like Bushs' war?

Dem's voted for the war. *So is a joint effort. *Clinton bombed
them
daily.
Plus Clinton's bosnia is still costing us money.

You keep harping about Bosnia. *Can you tell us how much we've
spent
in Bosnia?

I expect it's a low single digit percentage of what's been
****ed
away
in Iraq.

Additionally, they don't rank as moral equivalents by any
standard.

Bosnia may be an even more evil war. *There was absolutely nothing
in
it
for
us. *Was a European problem if at all. *How much of that Iraq
funding
was
pork? *Percentage wise? *25%? 30%?

What was the rest spent on, justifiable planes, tanks, fuel and
bombs?

It's not an issue of pork, it's an issue of 3 trillion dollars
wasted.
The whole ****ing lot.

Actually according to the budget, it is about $850 billion. *A far
piece
from $3 trillion. *And the pork part did not go to the war.

And how much have we spent in Bosnia?

Too much!

You have no idea but like to use the brush to paint Clinton as a
waster of public funds for wars of choice.

My expectation is that our investment represents and low single digit
percentage of what's been invested in Iraq.

Billions. *And since you seem so upset with the Iraq war, why not with
the
Bosnian war? *If you can destroy a country on the cheap, it is OK?

I'm sorry, what did we destroy? *I thought most of the destruction was
done by the locals.

Oops. *I was under the impression that around the clock bombing destroyed
stuff on the ground. *Thanks for enlightening me.

I guess it depends on how many times the clock went around, right?

Wrong. *Only takes one bomb to damage lots of stuff on the ground.

Vs. years of little bullets and mortars going 'round.

So, how much did it cost us to bomb? *No idea, right?

Your point is still unmade Hans Christian.

I didn't know Bill was a yacht maker?
http://www.hanschristianyachts.com/

Wrong Hans Christian.