Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.autos.sport.nascar,rec.motorcycles,tx.guns,rec.boats,rec.martial.arts
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" wrote in message
... "Datesfat Chicks" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.o...gage-meltdown/ This is a useful site worth forwarding. Note article Economics of Mass Deportation. Um ... has it been demonstrated that the mortgage meltdown is due to minority lending (as is claimed in the article)? Any citations there? You living under a rock, so that you haven't seen that in the news for the past year? You haven't provided any credible evidence that the CRA loans contributed to the crisis. From Wikipedia: BEGIN QUOTE Some legal and financial experts note that CRA regulated loans tend to be safe and profitable, and that subprime excesses came mainly from institutions not regulated by the CRA. In the February 2008 House hearing, law professor Michael S. Barr, a Treasury Department official under President Clinton,[64][108] stated that a Federal Reserve survey showed that affected institutions considered CRA loans profitable and not overly risky. He noted that approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the CRA, and another 25% to 30% came from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. Barr noted that institutions fully regulated by CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that "the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight".[109] According to Janet L. Yellen, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, independent mortgage companies made risky "high-priced loans" at more than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts; most CRA loans were responsibly made, and were not the higher-priced loans that have contributed to the current crisis.[110] A 2008 study by Traiger & Hinckley LLP, a law firm that counsels financial institutions on CRA compliance, found that CRA regulated institutions were less likely to make subprime loans, and when they did the interest rates were lower. CRA banks were also half as likely to resell the loans.[111] Emre Ergungor of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland found that there was no statistical difference in foreclosure rates between regulated and less-regulated banks, although a local bank presence resulted in fewer foreclosures.[112] END QUOTE The traceability between minorities, the CRA, and the meltdown just hasn't been made by you or any material you are willing to cite. Remember, us on the newsgroup have higher standards of proof than your neo-Nazi colleagues at the trailer park ... Datesfat. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tax Returns? We have no steeeeking tax returns. | General | |||
FS in NY Pile Driver & Push boats | Marketplace | |||
Shit, Spit & other Vomit | Touring | |||
No Oscar for the fat pile of crap | ASA | |||
Pyle or Pile of | ASA |