Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 1:16*pm, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:04:28 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: Gene wrote: On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: The Honduran Supreme Court removed their president in accord with legal procedure and the dictates of their constitution because the President was in violation of the law and the constitution. *However, Obama, Chavez, and Castro refuse to recognize the new president. *The Honduran president was attempting to institute a vote to allow himself to remain president but the constitution did not give this authority. Instead, he ordered ballots from Chavez but the army on orders from the Supreme Court *took control of the ballots as provided for in the constitution. *The presidents men broke in the are where the ballots were held and were trying to instate a referendum in violation of the constitution and the courts. Thus, Obama is clearly in favor of a govt outside the rule of law and constitutional authority. *He has clearly sided with extremist dictators. *Does this bode well for an election in 2012? *Start buying ammo now. The facts seem at odds with your assessment... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090628/...t_honduras_ref.... What was said previously seems to paraphrase this paragraph from your article. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ His ouster came hours before polls were to open on a constitutional referendum that Zelaya was pushing ahead even after the Supreme Court and the attorney general said it was illegal. ***The constitution bars changes to some of its clauses, such as the ban on a president serving more than one term, they said.*** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ From the article it appears Zelaya was trying to change the constitution to allow him to be president for longer that allowed in the constitution. The author of the article does spins everything to make it appear that Zelaya is in the right. My point is that "the Honduran Supreme Court removed their president in accord with legal procedure" is absolute BS. Even FOX news says, "Soldiers seized the national palace and flew President Manuel Zelaya into exile Sunday, hours before a disputed constitutional referendum." For you kiddies out there, I'm old enough to remember all of the military "coup d'etats du jour" of the 50's through the 80's.... if you aren't, it's time to hit the history books... If we have learned anything from history, it should be that Obama is rightfully concerned. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm The president was detained "In compliance with a court order". The courts had ruled his attempts to have this referendum was illegal and unconstitutional. If Obama was to attempt to hold such a referendum on his own and ignored court orders, he should be arrested. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama, Chavez and Iran | General | |||
Obama, Chavez and Iran | General | |||
For now on :: all Castro, 24/7 | Cruising | |||
Buy Citgo gas and pay Chavez | General | |||
Castro says (WPLG News) | ASA |