| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:05:38 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: |Turns out Democratic senator Boxer was wrong. Protocol DOES say a |military person should address a superior as either "Sir" or Ma'am". |The pentagon says they will not get in the middle of this but I say it |is a great example of the arrogance of Dems. I don't think so. I don't care for her, either, but she isn't his "superior" and he should have referred to her as senator.... just as one would address a female judge as "judge _____" or "your honor"? I don't think it was as big a deal as she made out. Ma'am is the same as sir in my book and that seems to be an adequate term of respect for a senator. Don't know what got her goat, his testimony, tone or she was just having a temporary hormone imbalance (men have them too so don't accuse me of bigotry) -- but it sure seem blown out of proportion. I wonder if Letterman will dedicate some jokes to her going off. Maybe she needs a dose of Alex Rodgrigez more than the Palin tweener. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| No shortage of $$$ at the top | General | |||
| Oil shortage problem explained... | General | |||
| U.S. Facing Crony Shortage! | General | |||
| U.S. Facing Crony Shortage! | General | |||
| Oil Shortage Explained | General | |||