Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Took the Tolman out yesterday. Went far up the Ocklocknee River from
Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 3:54*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. *Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. *Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. *Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. *She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. *Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. *We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. *We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 4:48*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. *Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. *Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. *Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. *She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. *Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. *We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. *We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. *When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. *The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. *Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. *I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. I was never impressed by Hunters. I'd like to see a truly dispassionate evaluation of the Mac26 quality but mention them on any sailing site and you instantly get flamed. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 4:56*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 15, 4:48*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. *Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. *Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. *Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. *She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. *Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. *We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. *We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. *When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. *The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. *Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. *I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. I was never impressed by Hunters. *I'd like to see a truly dispassionate evaluation of the Mac26 quality but mention them on any sailing site and you instantly get flamed. Aside from build quality and seaworthiness, a big issue is how easy is it to launch. If it is too much of a PITA, our boating would get more and more infrequent. I'd like to try one for a while including trailering and setup and using her. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 15, 4:48 pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. I was never impressed by Hunters. I'd like to see a truly dispassionate evaluation of the Mac26 quality but mention them on any sailing site and you instantly get flamed. Hunter: ordinary construction. Mac: about half the price of a similar-sized Hunter. Why..that makes the Mac...a bargain! -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 15, 4:48 pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. I was never impressed by Hunters. I'd like to see a truly dispassionate evaluation of the Mac26 quality but mention them on any sailing site and you instantly get flamed. Hunters are nice light air sailors. But they will test your metal in anything over 20 kts. I set out to buy a venture 23 but ended up with a Hunter 25 instead. That was my last sailboat before I switched to power and I never looked back. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jun 15, 4:48*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 15, 3:54 pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Took the Tolman out yesterday. *Went far up the Ocklocknee River from Ocklocknee River State park to where it looked like the river scenes from Apocalypse Now. *Side channels all over, swampy, muggy as hell and gators everywhere. *Stopped at an isolated landing way up there and looked around. Later, my wife remarked that although ti had been fun, she was bored when I drove the boat for a long time and she did not like driving it. *She thinks she does a lot when we go sailing, in reality, she is mostly an encumbrance when we sail but she thinks she helps. This got me thinking about the two forms of boating and realized they have entirely different motives. *Sailing is ussually about the act of boating, ie the actual sailing whereas powerboating is mostly about using the boat to go places. *We go sailing for a day without going anywhere, just back and forth across Apalachee Bay or just out-as-far- as-we-can-go. *We always use the powerboat to go someplace cool (ok, in this case really hot). If I had to choose one over the other, I do not know which it would be. What you've said is probably a good reason the Mac 26 is so popular. --Vic I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. *When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. *The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. *Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. *I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. I was never impressed by Hunters. I'd like to see a truly dispassionate evaluation of the Mac26 quality but mention them on any sailing site and you instantly get flamed. Harry knows about all there is to know about sailboats and sailing. He's been around the Horn a couple times. Pay him heed. -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:48:39 -0400, HK wrote:
I believe that boats like the Mac 26 are the future of sailboat sales. When you consider the cost of keeping a boat in a slip, few young couples can afford it. The Mac26 makes having a reasonable sized boat affordable. I will also argue that if used as intended, the Mac26 is probably safer than most other sailboats because she can quickly get back to port when it gets nasty out there. Her trailerability makes her far more useful than most heavy boats. Unfortunately, Macgregor has reputation for poor quality due to their old line of Venture boats. I do not know how their reputation for quality is right now. A decently built sailboat of that size and style sells for twice as much as the Mac, and I'm not talking top-drawer, either - just ordinary construction, like, say, a 27' Hunter. Different purpose boats. The Mac 26 will go where Froggie took the Tolman yesterday. The Hunter won't. Hunter min draft 3'6" Mac 26 min draft 12" Hunter displacement 7,656 lbs. Mac displacement 2,550 lbs. Macs are lightly built boats, easily trailered, and economical under power. Having read the Mac forums for years, there are very few complaints about build quality. Some upgrade the factory rigging to heavier stays. They are also highly customizable, like the Carolina Skiff, another high mpg boat - due to lightness of build. For Florida coastal/harbor/bay/swamp/beach both boats do well. The CS hulls flap at speed. Some owners glass in a couple 2x4's to stop that. Makes 'em feel better (-: Others don't bother. --Vic |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Powerboats vs sailboats | General | |||
FS: Powerboats in NY | Marketplace | |||
FS: Powerboats in NY | Marketplace | |||
Jeanneau Powerboats | ASA | |||
Powerboats Suck | ASA |