Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, An
intelligent person would see the hypocrisy but they cannot.
The inability to reason is one of the determining factors in someone
becoming liberal. Reasoning is simply hard for them so they resort to
emotionalism and a "follow the herd" mentality. Their difficulty in
reasoning explains why so many artsy-fartsy types are liberals and why
most LESS intelligent women are liberal.
How does this explain liberalism among academics? Simple, most
academics are capable of reasoning in a narrow field and are incapable
of doing so in a global sense. They are in effect high functioning
"idiot savants" with no actual world experience.
Their inability of liberals to reason also explains why they often use
some sort of emotional argument whenever they are attacked. By
calling someone a "racist" or bigot or similar, it allows them to feel
they have done something without the burden of thinking.
Those who can reason have normally relied on directly attacking them
with the idea that REASONING people should rule the world. However,
you have to realize that the flaw of democracy is that morons will
always outnumber reasoning people. Thus, the attempt to obtain an
intelligent government by voting will always fail.
So, what should reasoning people do? Simple, we use emotionalism to
obtain a system that makes sense. Emotionalism can be changed as
easily as the winds direction and we simply use that to our
advantage. We waste our time in attacking the libs on grounds of
reason, instead we use emotion to attack them. We show the lib pols
we do not like to be callous and foolish (even if they are not) and we
manipulate the ones we can by using emotion.
We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.

Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON,


snerk go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

On Jun 15, 3:11*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Exactly what I thought when I read the idiot's response!

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON,


snerk go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

[Idiotic statement about nihilists snipped. Obviously, HK doesn't understand
its definition.]

With that sort of response, Frogwatch's point is made...

On Jun 15, 3:14*pm, "lupowell" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m... Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON,

snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

[Idiotic statement about nihilists snipped. Obviously, HK doesn't understand
its definition.]

With that sort of response, Frogwatch's point is made...

I think Palins characterization of Letterman as being a 60 yr old
pervert interested in raping a 14 yr old girl is an excellent example
of this method. Letterman prob is not a pervert interested in raping
14 yr old girls but he is stupid so she should take advantage of his
stupidity and should press the charge harder. Old male pervs preying
on very young girls is a charge that will resonate with most mothers.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, An
intelligent person would see the hypocrisy but they cannot.

Golly, that's exactly what scientists have recently confirmed about
conservatives.

They'd love to review your credentials. Not.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Yikes. You're a case in point. Head case.

On Jun 15, 3:51*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Yikes. *You're a case in point. *Head case.

Two out of two, rarely do you get such results in any measurement but
still lousy statistics.

On Jun 15, 3:51*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch





wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Yikes. *You're a case in point. *Head case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Call him another name... You only open your mouth to change feet
anyway..