Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, An
intelligent person would see the hypocrisy but they cannot.
The inability to reason is one of the determining factors in someone
becoming liberal. Reasoning is simply hard for them so they resort to
emotionalism and a "follow the herd" mentality. Their difficulty in
reasoning explains why so many artsy-fartsy types are liberals and why
most LESS intelligent women are liberal.
How does this explain liberalism among academics? Simple, most
academics are capable of reasoning in a narrow field and are incapable
of doing so in a global sense. They are in effect high functioning
"idiot savants" with no actual world experience.
Their inability of liberals to reason also explains why they often use
some sort of emotional argument whenever they are attacked. By
calling someone a "racist" or bigot or similar, it allows them to feel
they have done something without the burden of thinking.
Those who can reason have normally relied on directly attacking them
with the idea that REASONING people should rule the world. However,
you have to realize that the flaw of democracy is that morons will
always outnumber reasoning people. Thus, the attempt to obtain an
intelligent government by voting will always fail.
So, what should reasoning people do? Simple, we use emotionalism to
obtain a system that makes sense. Emotionalism can be changed as
easily as the winds direction and we simply use that to our
advantage. We waste our time in attacking the libs on grounds of
reason, instead we use emotion to attack them. We show the lib pols
we do not like to be callous and foolish (even if they are not) and we
manipulate the ones we can by using emotion.
We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.