On Jun 15, 3:51*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Yikes. *You're a case in point. *Head case.

Two out of two, rarely do you get such results in any measurement but
still lousy statistics.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:56:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 15, 3:51*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch



wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Like many people, I used to be astonished by the amount of hypocrisy
exhibited by liberals. *However, once I understood how their minds
work, I no longer considered it odd. *The reason they can exhibit such
hypocrisy and not see it is because THEY ARE UNABLE TO REASON, *

*snerk *go invent something useful...and leave the right-wing
political "thinking" to the usual rec.boats nitwits.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

A case in point.

Yikes. *You're a case in point. *Head case.

Two out of two, rarely do you get such results in any measurement but
still lousy statistics.

Is that both of your personalities you're counting?