Liberals, hypocrisy and reason
 

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:38:14 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:


"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...

We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.

That is priceless.

And what priceless line would you pen about the stupidity of electing
George Bush twice?

Liberals, hypocrisy and reason
 

jps wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:38:14 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...

We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.
That is priceless.

And what priceless line would you pen about the stupidity of electing
George Bush twice?


Ahh, but you obviously are not aware of the Bush Catch22 - that the fact
that the previous president was dumb as a post did not matter, because
the righties think it is OK to vote a dummy into office so long as he is
anti-abortion, pro-christianity, anti-science, willing to engage in wars
of convenience, and eager to allow the corporationists to rule the roost.

Froggy's political astuteness is exceeded only by his inability to come
up with a practical invention that might interest the public.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Liberals, hypocrisy and reason
 

On Jun 16, 10:30*am, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:38:14 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
....

We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.
That is priceless.

And what priceless line would you pen about the stupidity of electing
George Bush twice?

Ahh, but you obviously are not aware of the Bush Catch22 - that the fact
that the previous president was dumb as a post did not matter, because
the righties think it is OK to vote a dummy into office so long as he is
anti-abortion, pro-christianity, anti-science, willing to engage in wars
of convenience, and eager to allow the corporationists to rule the roost.

Froggy's political astuteness is exceeded only by his inability to come
up with a practical invention that might interest the public.

What inventions have YOU come up with that might interest the public?
How do you know about all of Frog's inventions, patents, etc. and how
well they are doing on the market?

Liberals, hypocrisy and reason
 

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:38:14 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...


We got Obama by underestimating the stupidity of liberals, not by
underestimating their ability.
That is priceless.

And what priceless line would you pen about the stupidity of electing
George Bush twice?


Ahh, but you obviously are not aware of the Bush Catch22 - that the fact
that the previous president was dumb as a post did not matter, because
the righties think it is OK to vote a dummy into office so long as he is
anti-abortion, pro-christianity, anti-science, willing to engage in wars
of convenience, and eager to allow the corporationists to rule the roost.

Froggy's political astuteness is exceeded only by his inability to come
up with a practical invention that might interest the public.



Can you prove any of this dribble. Didn't think so.