![]() |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry. big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance about our current CIC. You've done nothing but post carping bull****. I know that both of you are smarter than that. There's your first mistake. Not very funny. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Here's another word for you. prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group. You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of all. When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech Funny how all this works huh? Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement. Now that's funny. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry. big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance about our current CIC. You've done nothing but post carping bull****. I know that both of you are smarter than that. There's your first mistake. Not very funny. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Here's another word for you. prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group. You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of all. When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech Funny how all this works huh? Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement. Now that's funny. Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to you here again. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:01:55 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry. big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance about our current CIC. You've done nothing but post carping bull****. I know that both of you are smarter than that. There's your first mistake. Not very funny. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Here's another word for you. prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group. You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of all. When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech Funny how all this works huh? Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement. Now that's funny. Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to you here again. I believe I've already earned my way onto his **** list. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
jps wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:01:55 -0400, HK wrote: jps wrote: On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry. big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance about our current CIC. You've done nothing but post carping bull****. I know that both of you are smarter than that. There's your first mistake. Not very funny. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Here's another word for you. prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group. You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of all. When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech Funny how all this works huh? Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement. Now that's funny. Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to you here again. I believe I've already earned my way onto his **** list. Only yesterday he claimed the model Husqie garden tractor I have doesn't exist, as in Husqvarna never made such a model. So I posted a photo of it, along with the manufacturer's spec's. He's sooooooo easy. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind. I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we can focus on what needs to be accomplished. That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long time. Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging to see some of you liberals catching up. Eisboch Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about judge nominees? Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Eisboch "Moderate" conservative. snerk Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed. Eisboch That is correct! |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:54:47 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:29:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. Psst - there's a name for guys like Jon and Harry. big·ot – noun - a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. MIRROR PLEASE! I must have missed your single pleasant utterance about our current CIC. You've done nothing but post carping bull****. I know that both of you are smarter than that. There's your first mistake. Not very funny. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Here's another word for you. prej·u·diced – noun - an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason - any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable - unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group. You've done much to earn it. Narrow defines your politics best of all. When you think about it - it's pretty much "hate speech". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech Funny how all this works huh? Not at all funny. Look at who's leading the "conservative" movement. Now that's funny. Watch it there...if you press SW Tom too closely, or question his choices, he'll have a hissy fit and then never ever never ever talk to you here again. That's *your* MO, asshole. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind. I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we can focus on what needs to be accomplished. That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long time. Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging to see some of you liberals catching up. Eisboch Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about judge nominees? Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Eisboch I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a little to the left are far right extremists. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about judge nominees? Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Eisboch "Moderate" conservative. snerk Like I suggested , .... oh, never mind. Your too programmed. Eisboch Ok, ok. "You're" BTW .... You crack me up. A while back ... year or so ago ... when we could discuss things more rationally, you identified me as a "moderate" conservative with whom you didn't have a major problem with in terms of political viewpoints. But now, according to you and your puppy, I am a bible thumping, far right, knuckle dragging Neanderthal, a relic from the dark ages. What happened? I haven't changed a bit. Eisboch Got Religion? . . . :) |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:55:56 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message m... "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind. I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we can focus on what needs to be accomplished. That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long time. Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging to see some of you liberals catching up. Eisboch Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about judge nominees? Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Eisboch I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a little to the left are far right extremists. I know you claim to be a D but I don't expect you've gone to any precinct meeting recently. You haven't a clue what left is anymore. |
al-Qaeda terrorists kidnap Obama teleprompter
jps wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:55:56 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... I can't stand that Air America and MSNBC is paying him any mind. I had to turn it off. Listening to him makes me ill and it's a tremendous waste of time and energy. It's time to ignore him so we can focus on what needs to be accomplished. That's about the most intelligent statement you have made in a long time. Most moderate conservatives have know that for years. It's encouraging to see some of you liberals catching up. Eisboch Moderate conservatives? You mean the ones who only *listen* to Rush, Sean, O'Reilly & Beck and nod their heads in approval, instead of rushing out to kill doctors, blow up clinics, and make idiotic comments about judge nominees? Give me a break. In other words, unless I subscribe to the liberal thinking of you and jps, I am automatically "one of them". Talk about shallow, narrow minds. I know that both of you are smarter than that. Both of you should throw away your talking point notes and start speaking for yourselves, using your own brains. Eisboch I have pretty much figured that Harry is not that smart, or is on the verge of commitment. jps is so far to the left, he thinks all that are only a little to the left are far right extremists. I know you claim to be a D but I don't expect you've gone to any precinct meeting recently. You haven't a clue what left is anymore. As James Carville sez: The Republicans got spanked in 2008, and they're going to keep getting spanked. The explanation is simple: • They've destroyed the myth of conservative competence. • They're corrupt. • They've lost the culture war. Add to that the incredible amount of infighting going on between the dimwitted ultra-religious Republicans, the neocon Republicans, the so-called RINO's, et cetera, plus the stable of lackluster, doctrinaire idiots who are already fighting for the nomination, and 2012 is shaping up as a year of more pain for the old GOP. Delicious. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com