HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke
underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz
interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development
in 2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp
car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that
one reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators
wanted, rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed"
ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early
1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and
raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point,
and that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his
miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay
talk'?

Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.

Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking
at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives
and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept.

You might say that Harry Krause has been and is sucking on America's
teat. His landlady might be too. Although she may be contributing
something of value. Who knows.

On Jun 4, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:46:14 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:33:57 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.
The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. *Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. *And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?

Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. *I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.
Which is really funny, since both Herring and his wife have been sucking
at the taxpayers' teat for their jobs and benefits most of their lives
and, as everyone knows, "guv'mint" is a "libral" concept.

Did he earn a pension? *Is it too much to hope for that it'll get
taken away like what happens in the "free market?"

Federal pensions...both safe.

Why should the government be obligated to protect pensions when the
"free market" isn't? *Shouldn't government operate just like the free
market?

Why should an old cocksucker who hates goverment be protected by same?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Damn you're as much of a vulgar low life as slammer. Educated and
intelligent people can get a point across without all of that. You and
Harry can't.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!

What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.

Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps?

Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your
conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you.

Every single newsgroup.

You really should up your sessions to 5 a week.

So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more
like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock.

Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:47:49 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
.
Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control
everything arounds us, unlike righties.
I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many
nut
cases who profess to be on the right of left.

Mental illness has no restrictions.
Nutcases and postal are two different things.

Righties go postal.

May I point you to Wichita?
The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the
USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing
nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have
been working on the why of it ever since.

Casady
Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last
100 years comes from the right.

Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics.
Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is
dumb enough to believe it.
Oh, that's an excellent argument filled with rich historical fact and
subtle nuance. Thanks for digging so deep into your intellectual
resources for the thoughtful response.

Silly ****ing ****.


Kruger spends too much time lurking in dark, skanky holes waiting for young
girls to pass so he can harass them. .



Really, dummy? What did you base that "fact" on?

jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?


Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.

"Having at"?

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?


Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.

"Having at"?

Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there?

You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler.

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.

The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!

What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.

Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps?

Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your
conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you.

Every single newsgroup.

You really should up your sessions to 5 a week.

So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more
like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock.

Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for
boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be
interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I
remain open to alternatives.

Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who
can only think of one boat at a time?

I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative,"
the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at
a time.

jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.
The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?

Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.
"Having at"?

Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there?

You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler.

What does "Not much below you is there?" mean? I am not familiar with
that expression. Does it refer to his silly ****?



--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:07:06 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.
The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.

Do you want to compare sizes? Value? HP? Bilge pumps?

Every newsgroup you frequent includes a long history of your
conflicts. Food, barbeque, fast food, what have you.

Every single newsgroup.

You really should up your sessions to 5 a week.
So you lied when you said you were looking for a boat? You are more
like WAFA with every keystroke, Sherlock.

Dickless, people who are interested in boats are always looking for
boats. If something showed up in my price range right now I'd be
interested. I'm holding out for what I've set my sights on but I
remain open to alternatives.

Are you one of those stick-up-the-ass blindered "conservatives" who
can only think of one boat at a time?

I take that back, we know you're a stick-up-the-ass "conservative,"
the only part I'm missing is if you're only interested in one boat at
a time.

Are you from the US? I keep learning new expression from reading your
posts. What the heck does blindered mean? Or was this a misspelling
of "blundered" ? When you say "stick-up-the-ass" do you mean up his
poop chute or his humorous ****? It almost sounds like you are have a
random generator putting words together to form something that resembles
a sentence.
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:56:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:09:43 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:45:04 -0400, D K
wrote:

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote:

wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating
the
taste of the American public."
GM has proven him wrong.
--Vic
Does it really have to do with taste?
Just depends on how you define taste.
As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles."
What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview
on TV.
Seemed like a reasonable guy.
So I looked him up on Wiki and found this:
"When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in
2001
one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was
going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is
estimated at $6.9 million."
And this:
"He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one
reason
for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in
Washington
that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted,
rather
than what customers wanted."
That is what I mean by "taste."
Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools.
Gonna save GM with 500 hp car.
Gonna give the customers what they want.
Sorry, close your ears. I have to say this.
LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!!
I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!!
--Vic
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their
overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.
Like lobster boats?
Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis
substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary.
That you have any purpose is imaginary.
The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership
of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that
looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.

My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and
that
service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable
like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.

Amazing WAFA reply to boatless jps. Delicious!
What's delicious is how you stick your nose is other folk's sweaty
assholes. And, I have a boat silly ****.
What is a 'boat silly ****'.

Did he mean, 'I have a boat-silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat, silly ****'?

Did he mean, 'I have a boat silly, ****?

These references to 'delicious' gay sex must be for the benefit of
Donnie and Harry,

I am surprised that people with *any* sense of decorum will even
converse with this guy.
--
John H

..and yet you feel compelled to respond to him!
Why is that Johnny..are you strangely excited by the so called..gay talk'?

Having nothing more than drivel to offer, he attacks my grammar.

Johnny's excited by having at Librals, just like I'm excited by having
at idiots. I have him plonked, not worth the time.

Silly old ****.
"Having at"?

Down to critiquing expressions? Not much below you is there?

You gotta have a strong stomach to be a **** hauler.

What does "Not much below you is there?" mean? I am not familiar with
that expression. Does it refer to his silly ****?

As they say, "as you see fit."