Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 3, 11:40*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:34:33 -0400, jim78 wrote: HK wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons.. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman. Would you please learn to punctuate properly. Your work is unreadable. A pig would have no trouble reading Harry's post. *A silly **** may.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And you sure ARE a pig. What a freakin' low life. |
#42
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 3, 11:16*am, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:17:06 -0400, jim78 wrote: wrote: On Jun 2, 9:26 pm, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:55:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: Mencken famously stated ""No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." GM has proven him wrong. --Vic Does it really have to do with taste? Just depends on how you define taste. As in, "Not enough Americans have a taste for GM vehicles." What got to me thinking about this was I saw a Bob Lutz interview on TV. Seemed like a reasonable guy. So I looked him up on Wiki and found this: "When Lutz became chairman of GM North American development in 2001 one of the first things he stated was that his new 500 hp car was going to save General Motors. His full compensation in 2008 is estimated at $6.9 million." And this: "He will retire from GM at the end of 2009. Lutz said that one reason for his decision was the increasing regulatory climate in Washington that would force him to design what Federal regulators wanted, rather than what customers wanted." That is what I mean by "taste." Lutz and the others running GM were complete fools. Gonna save GM with 500 hp car. Gonna give the customers what they want. Sorry, close your ears. *I have to say this. LUTZ, YOU TASTELESS ****ING MORON!! I WOULDN'T HIRE YOU TO CUT BAIT!! --Vic It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats. Like lobster boats? Krause sure does seem to have more than his share of penis substitutes.. Even if some of them are imaginary. That you have any purpose is imaginary. The only photo FloridaJim ever posted publicly that "claimed" ownership of a boat showed a decrepit I/O hulk from the 1980s or early 1990s that looked as if it had served as a roadside home for roaches and raccoons. My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, Don, Harry misspelled a word!!! Remember now, you and Harry think that people who misspell are "idiots". |
#43
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 3, 10:56*am, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:18:58 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: GC Boater wrote: It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered penis substitutes in cars and boats.- Hide quoted text - Penis substitutes? *Would that explain the Hatteras and the Zimerman- like lobster boat? He said the same thing about people who owned handguns. I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their own lives. *Do you fit that description? Two points: 1. *I was not discussing you or even talking to you, I was discussing the person who stated those who owned handguns were using them due to them having a very small penis. * You might have said, it, but I never heard you say it, Harry said it everyday, till the day he purchased a handgun. 2. *I don't own a handgun, never have. *I have no problem if handguns have increased regulations or completely banned. * I really don't have a problem if we leave the law the way it is. * *I completely agree that in most cases handguns are used against the handgun owner (by a criminal who takes the gun away from them), or they use the gun to kill themselves. *Based upon Harry's behavior, and I would think the odds are he will eventually use his handgun to harm himself, or he will go postal at the local mall, but I don't think banning guns will result in criminals or mentally unstable individuals turning in their handguns. It will just make selling them very profitable for organized crime. Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. *We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. Good for you that you're not among the paranoid nuts, at least on this subject. I'm so honored to be the object of desire of rec.boats' ****heads like Reggie, Loogie, floridajim, *et cetera.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one here "desires" you. I, for one, wish you'd take your lying, fat, nasty, vulgar, low life ass somewhere else. |
#44
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#45
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:01:28 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: I completely agree that in most cases handguns are used against the handgun owner (by a criminal who takes the gun away from them), or they use the gun to kill themselves Utter bull****. In most cases handguns are never used in anger. 99% of them. Your 'most cases' falls in the 1 %. A guy once pulled a knife on me and demanded money. I pulled a .45 and told him to run. He did. Had he tried to ' use it against me' I would have shot him several times. Back in the bin. Casady You're much better off listening to Krause. He never bull****s. He went to Yale, you know. Reggie may have been talking about handgun deaths, not the handguns themselves. -- John H "The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher |
#46
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:52:13 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:36:36 -0700, jps wrote: I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their own lives. Do you fit that description? Tens of millions of handgun owners, a few thousand suicides. Many people are math challenged. Are you? Casady I don't care how many are owned. It's how they're used. A large percentage of use is against the owner or immediate family. Bull****. |
#48
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0500, Richard Casady wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:38:25 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:14:36 -0400, "Doral 36" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." . Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control everything arounds us, unlike righties. I think you are delusional if you don't think there are just as many nut cases who profess to be on the right of left. Mental illness has no restrictions. Nutcases and postal are two different things. Righties go postal. May I point you to Wichita? The man who killed JFK, Lee Oswald, was far enough left to move to the USSR. He came back and killed the Prez. Within a day a right wing nut, Jack Ruby, killed him. Scum come in all flavors. The nuts have been working on the why of it ever since. Casady Richard, most of the violence we've seen in this country for the last 100 years comes from the right. Oswald and Ruby were driven by far more than politics. Just keeping making this **** up, moron. Donnie aside, no one here is dumb enough to believe it. |
#49
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#50
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My guess is that he was mustered out of the Navy at some point, and that service "servicing" his shipmates was the high point of his miserable like. Afterwards, he pretended to be a boat repair handyman.- Hide quoted text - Hey Krausie, how 'bout posting a pic of your Zimerman-like and your Hatteras, eh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global Warming Debunked | ASA | |||
Global Warming Absolutely Debunked | ASA | |||
Donal, Oz, Navigator, Bobsprit and other terrorist sympathizers debunked again | ASA |