"HK" wrote in message
...


What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station
wagon?


What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially
the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and
you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have
strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely.
They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91
in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...


What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station
wagon?


What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars,
especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they
were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt
laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow
vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if
I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it.

Eisboch

Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new
Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made
America a great place...diversity of opinion.

"HK" wrote in message
m...

........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of
opinion.


For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity
of opinion.


For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you.

Eisboch


It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I
disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding
those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want
to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because
of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views.

As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country
are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down
their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no
impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is
opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them
to get one.

On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments
placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it.

I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this
is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in
front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards.

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity
of opinion.


For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you.

Eisboch


It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I
disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding
those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want
to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because
of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views.

As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country
are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down
their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no
impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is
opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them
to get one.

On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments
placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it.

I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this
is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in
front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards.


Great idea. Why don't you go dangle your thoughts somewhere else.

On May 28, 9:01*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...

........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of
opinion.

For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you.

Eisboch

Exactly. Harry's the narrow minded person I know of.

On Thu, 28 May 2009 09:01:07 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...

........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of
opinion.


For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you.

Eisboch

As Fords will soon be the only American car not built by the
government, I can understand a socialist's negativity towards Fords.
They probably get ranked right up there with Wal Mart.
--

John H

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...


What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station
wagon?


What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars,
especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they
were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt
laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great
tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories
and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold
onto it.

Eisboch

Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new
Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made
America a great place...diversity of opinion.

Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem.

On May 28, 9:38*am, jim785 wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station
wagon?

What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? * They were great cars,
especially the mid 80's and up models. * 1991 was the last year they
were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt
laden MA. * *They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great
tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories
and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold
onto it.

Eisboch

Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new
Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made
America a great place...diversity of opinion.

Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Makes you wonder why just preceeding this tidbit, that every time
someone disagrees with Harry he starts his third grade like name
calling and childish insults, huh?

wrote:
On May 28, 9:38 am, jim785 wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station
wagon?
What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars,
especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they
were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt
laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great
tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories
and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold
onto it.
Eisboch
Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new
Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made
America a great place...diversity of opinion.
Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Makes you wonder why just preceeding this tidbit, that every time
someone disagrees with Harry he starts his third grade like name
calling and childish insults, huh?

And then...in an admission of defeat...invokes the bogus "killfile" to
avoid further embarrassment!