Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

wrote in message
...

On 28-May-2009, "The moderator" wrote:

I concede that they would be household names only if they were
Republicans.
I just get tired of doing the media's work.

Timothy Geithner- Treasure
Tom Daschle - Health and Human Services
Ron Kirk - Us Trade Representative
Nancy Killefer - Chief Performance Officer
Hilda Solis- Dept Labor

Don't forget Gov Richardson

--
bill-o

Ethics, is yesterday's news. Governor Richardson's case has some intrigue,
but not near as interesting to the left as the fiction they pinned on the
Bush Administration.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

"R&B" wrote in
news:2009052817182131729-noneofyourbusiness@allcom:

On 2009-05-27 11:09:42 -0400, "Lamont Cranston"
said:

Project China Blue Book wrote:
In article ,
HK wrote:

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote:
The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of
the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule.
Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think
or say about anything?

Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies.



It could hang out on the margins indefinitely.

The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The
last thing we need is a one party system.


If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an
existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so.

The Democrat party is its own opposition party.

There is no "Democrat party."


Short attention span.

Randy



No, he's correct. There is no "Democrat Party". Just as there is no
"Republic Party". But if you disagree, maybe you could provide a link of
some sort to the party's website.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

On May 28, 10:33*am, "Lamont Cranston"
wrote:
Charlie wrote:
On May 27, 3:01 pm, tonysin wrote:
On May 27, 8:10 am, wrote:

On May 26, 8:35 pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."

wrote:
On May 26, 7:03 pm, tonysin
wrote:

I know that conservatards don't care about facts,
but where
did you get that she is a lesbian?

If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had
a gay
Supreme Court Justice.

There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this
nation's
history. Only two have been women. If there haven't
been any
gays, well, they're due.

Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual
preferences
google:

"Sotomayor lesbian"

Martin

Unless I missed it, Google shows nobody but right
wingnuts claiming
she's a lesbian, based only on the fact that she's not
married. The
Gay and Lesbian Alliance was disappointed that Obama did
NOT
nominate a gay or lesbian.

Google manipulates anything that portrays the left or
liberals in a
bad light.

Yeah, and the black helicopters are snatching conservatives
out of their beds at night.

ROTFLMAO! *I love you nutter conspiracy theorists!

I'm fairly sure my opinion is a valid one.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

On May 28, 11:01*am, Audie Murphy's Ghost
wrote:
In article , Charlie wrote:



On May 27, 11:10*am, wrote:
On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."

wrote:
On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote:

I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you
get that she is a lesbian?

If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme
Court Justice.

There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history..
Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well,
they're due.

Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google:

"Sotomayor lesbian"

Martin

Justice Breyer is gay? I never heard this. *What it has to do with
boats, I'll never know.

The rumors have been about Souter, not Breyer. *The wingnuts are having
trouble keeping their babble points straight (you should pardon the
expression).

I don't think Souter is...he's just a guy who loves life being by
himself...there are some Men and Women like that. All the more power
to him...sad thing is in this day and age if you're not married many
people assume you're gay. I like Souter for the most part except when
he cast that one vote to take away personal property from a woman in
that eminent domain case. It just wasn't one of his brighter moments
imo.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

On 2009-05-29 10:05:13 -0400, Alberto Gonzalez said:

"R&B" wrote in
news:2009052817182131729-noneofyourbusiness@allcom:

On 2009-05-27 11:09:42 -0400, "Lamont Cranston"
said:

Project China Blue Book wrote:
In article ,
HK wrote:

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote:
The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of
the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule.
Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think
or say about anything?

Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies.



It could hang out on the margins indefinitely.

The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The
last thing we need is a one party system.


If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an
existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so.

The Democrat party is its own opposition party.

There is no "Democrat party."


Short attention span.

Randy



No, he's correct. There is no "Democrat Party". Just as there is no
"Republic Party". But if you disagree, maybe you could provide a link of
some sort to the party's website.

Yes, I know this. The Republicans have made a concerted effort to cut
off the last syllable of the proper name of the Democratic Party every
time they mention it as an act of disrespect. Like junior high
name-calling, it serves to do little to insult the Democratic Party or
its followers, but speaks volumes about the lack of respect Republicans
have for anyone other than themselves.

I was referring off-handedly to the short attention span of someone who
won't bother to spell out the entire name.

Randy

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

"R&B" wrote in
news:2009052915071116807-noneofyourbusiness@allcom:

On 2009-05-29 10:05:13 -0400, Alberto Gonzalez
said:

"R&B" wrote in
news:2009052817182131729-noneofyourbusiness@allcom:

On 2009-05-27 11:09:42 -0400, "Lamont Cranston"
said:

Project China Blue Book wrote:
In article ,
HK wrote:

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote:
The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of
the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule.
Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think
or say about anything?

Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies.



It could hang out on the margins indefinitely.

The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The
last thing we need is a one party system.


If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven
an existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so.

The Democrat party is its own opposition party.

There is no "Democrat party."


Short attention span.

Randy



No, he's correct. There is no "Democrat Party". Just as there is no
"Republic Party". But if you disagree, maybe you could provide a link
of some sort to the party's website.

Yes, I know this. The Republicans have made a concerted effort to cut
off the last syllable of the proper name of the Democratic Party every
time they mention it as an act of disrespect. Like junior high
name-calling, it serves to do little to insult the Democratic Party or
its followers, but speaks volumes about the lack of respect
Republicans have for anyone other than themselves.

I was referring off-handedly to the short attention span of someone
who won't bother to spell out the entire name.

I missed that - sorry. And let me say, I agree with you 100%.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

On May 29, 10:48*am, Charlie wrote:
On May 28, 10:33*am, "Lamont Cranston"



wrote:
Charlie wrote:
On May 27, 3:01 pm, tonysin wrote:
On May 27, 8:10 am, wrote:

On May 26, 8:35 pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."

wrote:
On May 26, 7:03 pm, tonysin
wrote:

I know that conservatards don't care about facts,
but where
did you get that she is a lesbian?

If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had
a gay
Supreme Court Justice.

There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this
nation's
history. Only two have been women. If there haven't
been any
gays, well, they're due.

Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual
preferences
google:

"Sotomayor lesbian"

Martin

Unless I missed it, Google shows nobody but right
wingnuts claiming
she's a lesbian, based only on the fact that she's not
married. The
Gay and Lesbian Alliance was disappointed that Obama did
NOT
nominate a gay or lesbian.

Google manipulates anything that portrays the left or
liberals in a
bad light.

Yeah, and the black helicopters are snatching conservatives
out of their beds at night.

ROTFLMAO! *I love you nutter conspiracy theorists!

I'm fairly sure my opinion is a valid one.

Why? What objective evidence do you have?

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

In article 2009052915071116807-noneofyourbusiness@allcom,
"R&B" wrote:

On 2009-05-29 10:05:13 -0400, Alberto Gonzalez
said:

"R&B" wrote in
news:2009052817182131729-noneofyourbusiness@allcom:

On 2009-05-27 11:09:42 -0400, "Lamont Cranston"
said:

Project China Blue Book wrote:
In article ,
HK wrote:

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote:
The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of
the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule.
Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think
or say about anything?

Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies.



It could hang out on the margins indefinitely.

The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The
last thing we need is a one party system.


If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an
existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so.

The Democrat party is its own opposition party.

There is no "Democrat party."


Short attention span.

Randy



No, he's correct. There is no "Democrat Party". Just as there is no
"Republic Party". But if you disagree, maybe you could provide a link of
some sort to the party's website.

Yes, I know this. The Republicans have made a concerted effort to cut
off the last syllable of the proper name of the Democratic Party every
time they mention it as an act of disrespect. Like junior high
name-calling, it serves to do little to insult the Democratic Party or
its followers, but speaks volumes about the lack of respect Republicans
have for anyone other than themselves.

I was referring off-handedly to the short attention span of someone who
won't bother to spell out the entire name.

Randy

Yes, they belong in the same dark pit with those who insist on turning
nouns into verbs, as in "to conference".

Aaaargh.

Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
 

On 2009-05-27 09:40:33 -0400, said:


On 26-May-2009, HK wrote:

Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies.

Sounds like Brer Rabbit to me. If the GOP moves to the center, esp on fiscal
and defense matters, you can just say whig. On the other hand I don't think
the "values" issues are a real winner for the party of Lincoln.


Here we finally agree on something.

Until the Republican Party divorces itself from the extreme factions of
the "religious right," it will continue to be a party of contradiction:
On the one hand, it touts smaller, less intrusive government. On the
other, the religious right continues to fight for legislating its
religious views on morality, intruding on what people do in their
bedrooms and in the privacy of family decisions (see Terri Schaivo),
the very opposite of a "less intrusive" government.

The problem for Republicans is, they can't win an election without the
religious right.

Makes for quite a connundrum, I'd say.

Randy