![]() |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 11:10*am, wrote:
On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni." wrote: On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin Justice Breyer is gay? I never heard this. What it has to do with boats, I'll never know. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
"Project China Blue Book" wrote in message ... In article , Tom wrote: On May 27, 10:07 am, Charlie wrote: On May 26, 7:57 pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25 pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. OK, I'll bite... what, exactly do we deserve to get one day? A chicken in every pot. The United States began providing that a long, long time ago. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 3:01*pm, tonysin wrote:
On May 27, 8:10*am, wrote: On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni." wrote: On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin Unless I missed it, Google shows nobody but right wingnuts claiming she's a lesbian, based only on the fact that she's not married. *The Gay and Lesbian Alliance was disappointed that Obama did NOT nominate a gay or lesbian. Google manipulates anything that portrays the left or liberals in a bad light. But if you do research on negative stories about conservatives or righties you'll find all the ammo you need plus more. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 7:38*pm, Tom wrote:
On May 27, 10:07*am, Charlie wrote: On May 26, 7:57*pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! *And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. *When that day arrives, God help us all. OK, I'll bite... what, exactly do we deserve to get one day? Tom Seriously? After what minorities have been through the past few hundred years as far as treatment from Whites, do you think they won't forget the past? I can't recall who said it, maybe it was Hannah Arendt, those who forget the past are bound to repeat it. I'll be the first to admit that hundreds of years ago our forefathers did treat minorities poorly. So now that America is fast becoming a majority nation of minorities, Whites lose power. As crime escalates in the cities, it will begin to take place in the suburbs. Now we know who are committing the lion share of crime today, it's minorities. Think of cities like Detroit, LA, Chicago, Philly, Houston, Newark and Jersey City, they're war zones. Just do the research and find out who are the gangs contributing to this madness and you'll find it's minorities. There are very few White gangs doing serious crimes like the Crips or bloods in LA or Mexican drug gangs in Texas and California. Toledo, Ohio just laid off more policeman so guess what happened, more and more people are out purchasing guns. Prisons are overcrowded and overcrowded due to a spike in minority committed crimes. I'll be the first one to admit that minorities and poor Whites don't have much of a future with employment. So they turn to crime to make a buck. I blame liberals for making it difficult for businesses to succeed in this country. If there were jobs in the inner cities of the US, crime would decrease substantially. So it's not like I am blaming minorities for all the ills of society, I'm blaming liberals for allowing it to happen. democrats have the power now to make good things happen....they've been complaining for years of being stifled by repubs from getting things done. Now is democrats chance to create jobs in the inner city and not through more government jobs but creating opportunities in the private sector. For years democrats have ruined business by over taxation and over regulation. Companies have left the US because it's cheaper overseas. How bout putting in place incentive programs to keep manufacturing jobs here and I don't mean protectionism. We have some very intelligent people in this country, surely someone could devise a program where it would be just as easy for a manufacturer to keep jobs here for our people. I blame management and unions for not working together for the betterment of all. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
wrote in message m... On 27-May-2009, William Clark wrote: Would you guys stop cross posting to rec.sport.golf, please? At least, until you have learnt some rudiments of the English language. hear, hear! -- bill-o -- an opposition back bencher Yeah. rec.golf is basically an easy going uneducated group. I think you may be confusing them. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
Charlie wrote:
On May 27, 3:01 pm, tonysin wrote: On May 27, 8:10 am, wrote: On May 26, 8:35 pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni." wrote: On May 26, 7:03 pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin Unless I missed it, Google shows nobody but right wingnuts claiming she's a lesbian, based only on the fact that she's not married. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance was disappointed that Obama did NOT nominate a gay or lesbian. Google manipulates anything that portrays the left or liberals in a bad light. Yeah, and the black helicopters are snatching conservatives out of their beds at night. ROTFLMAO! I love you nutter conspiracy theorists! |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
In article , Charlie wrote:
On May 27, 11:10*am, wrote: On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni." wrote: On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin Justice Breyer is gay? I never heard this. What it has to do with boats, I'll never know. The rumors have been about Souter, not Breyer. The wingnuts are having trouble keeping their babble points straight (you should pardon the expression). |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 2009-05-26 15:44:29 -0400, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."
said: On May 26, 12:35*pm, HK wrote: The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. It could hang out on the margins indefinitely. The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The last thing we need is a one party system. Karl Rove promised a permanent majority. Well, he got it. It's just not the majority he'd hoped for. As long as the Republican Party continues to cozy up to the religious wingnuts who wish to legislate their morality and neocons who want to bomb everyone else, the Republican Party will continue being a party of extremists whose beliefs are the antithesis of what America is really about. They may achieve "party purity" in the process (which seems to be their objective), which is fine. But it also makes them unelectable. I applaud them and wish them continued success in making their party smaller. Bring back the Whigs so we can start having some serious debates with real grown-ups. Randy |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 2009-05-27 11:09:42 -0400, "Lamont Cranston"
said: Project China Blue Book wrote: In article , HK wrote: Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote: On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote: The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. It could hang out on the margins indefinitely. The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The last thing we need is a one party system. If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so. The Democrat party is its own opposition party. There is no "Democrat party." Short attention span. Randy |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 28-May-2009, "The moderator" wrote: I concede that they would be household names only if they were Republicans. I just get tired of doing the media's work. Timothy Geithner- Treasure Tom Daschle - Health and Human Services Ron Kirk - Us Trade Representative Nancy Killefer - Chief Performance Officer Hilda Solis- Dept Labor Don't forget Gov Richardson -- bill-o |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com