| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
R&B wrote:
On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world Sucks being on the outside, doesn't it? Randy The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 12:35*pm, HK wrote:
The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. It could hang out on the margins indefinitely. The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The last thing we need is a one party system. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote: The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. It could hang out on the margins indefinitely. The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The last thing we need is a one party system. If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" wrote:
On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 12:35*pm, HK wrote:
R&B wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world Sucks being on the outside, doesn't it? Randy The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? You. Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. Sort of like Obama's doing now, huh? LOL |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
wrote in message m... On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world None of us are. We are living in Obamanation. You don't have to pay your bills in Obamanation and can line others pockets with bailout corruption. Just toss the taxpayers money to the wind, they don't care. It is Obamanation, where the Obamamobile comes in any color you want, as long as it is black. As we say in Obamanation, charge it. Maybe we will pay later, or maybe not. Or just send the bills to Obama Government Motors. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
Canuck57 wrote:
wrote in message m... On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world None of us are. We are living in Obamanation. You don't have to pay your bills in Obamanation and can line others pockets with bailout corruption. Just toss the taxpayers money to the wind, they don't care. It is Obamanation, where the Obamamobile comes in any color you want, as long as it is black. As we say in Obamanation, charge it. Maybe we will pay later, or maybe not. Or just send the bills to Obama Government Motors. Well, at least it's no longer Bushnation....where billions in taxpayer dollars didn't line American pockets...it line Iraqi pockets. Where thousands of Americans died based on a lie. Where greed ran rampant, without checks and balances. Where millions went without health care. Where the rich got richer and the poor, poorer. Yup. That was Bushnation. I'll take Obamanation over that any day. .. -- We must change the way we live, or the climate will do it for us. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oCYW4ScUnw |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you
get that she is a lesbian? |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 10:03*pm, tonysin wrote:
I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? He tried to jack-off to her on TV, but he couldn't get it up. Yeah, must be a lesbo! |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 2:38*pm, wrote:
On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world -- bill-o It's funny watching the wingnuts scramble trying to find something to smear her with. What I have witnessed today are a bunch of right- wingers scrambling to find something to oppose this pick on without making it look like what it is .... politics as usual. I even heard one wingnut mouthpiece claim that Sotomayor was only appointed to the Federal bench by George Bush as some sort of political gesture of goodwill to the Democrats, the obvious implication being that she wasn't really qualified for the job. I mean, how can she be qualified .... she's a WOMAN for Chrissakes ... and a Latino! The irony is that had Obama appointed some old pasty white guy, as is the norm, all the Repugs would be crying, "Where's the change you promised? Same old politics as usual!" It's early in the game, but I haven't yet heard one person give a valid reason to oppose her. No doubt, the Repugs will try to dredge (or is that Drudge) up some out-of-context remarks she made in some decision years ago in an attempt to smear her, but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 10:22�pm, Annika1980 wrote:
On May 26, 2:38�pm, wrote: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world -- bill-o It's funny watching the wingnuts scramble trying to find something to smear her with. What I have witnessed today are a bunch of right- wingers scrambling to find something to oppose this pick on without making it look like what it is .... politics as usual. I even heard one wingnut mouthpiece claim that Sotomayor was only appointed to the Federal bench by George Bush as some sort of political gesture of goodwill to the Democrats, the obvious implication being that she wasn't really qualified for the job. I mean, how can she be qualified .... she's a WOMAN for Chrissakes ... and a Latino! The irony is that had Obama appointed some old pasty white guy, as is the norm, all the Repugs would be crying, "Where's the change you promised? Same old politics as usual!" It's early in the game, but I haven't yet heard one person give a valid reason to oppose her. No doubt, the Repugs will try to dredge (or is that Drudge) up some out-of-context remarks she made in some decision years ago in an attempt to smear her, but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. She graduated Summa Cum Laude from Princeton. The wingers screaming above couldn't get into Princeton on the back of a garbage truck. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 10:20*pm, tomcervo wrote:
On May 26, 10:22 pm, Annika1980 wrote: On May 26, 2:38 pm, wrote: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world -- bill-o It's funny watching the wingnuts scramble trying to find something to smear her with. What I have witnessed today are a bunch of right- wingers scrambling to find something to oppose this pick on without making it look like what it is .... politics as usual. I even heard one wingnut mouthpiece claim that Sotomayor was only appointed to the Federal bench by George Bush as some sort of political gesture of goodwill to the Democrats, the obvious implication being that she wasn't really qualified for the job. I mean, how can she be qualified .... she's a WOMAN for Chrissakes ... and a Latino! The irony is that had Obama appointed some old pasty white guy, as is the norm, all the Repugs would be crying, "Where's the change you promised? Same old politics as usual!" It's early in the game, but I haven't yet heard one person give a valid reason to oppose her. No doubt, the Repugs will try to dredge (or is that Drudge) up some out-of-context remarks she made in some decision years ago in an attempt to smear her, but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. She graduated Summa Cum Laude from Princeton. The wingers screaming above couldn't get into Princeton on the back of a garbage truck. Last week, they tried to make an issue of her intellect... she isn't smart enough to be a SC Justice... they'll say anything... it's shameful. She has been a judge longer than any of the current justices were before their appointments. Tom |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote:
I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
In article
, Tom wrote: Last week, they tried to make an issue of her intellect... she isn't smart enough to be a SC Justice... they'll say anything... it's shameful. It cuts both ways. Do you not remember the Clarence Thomas high-tech lynching? |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 20:35:26 -0700 (PDT), "Kurgan. presented by
Gringioni." wrote: If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. You haven't noticed that they all wear gowns? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
In article , John Reddy wrote:
In article , Tom wrote: Last week, they tried to make an issue of her intellect... she isn't smart enough to be a SC Justice... they'll say anything... it's shameful. It cuts both ways. Do you not remember the Clarence Thomas high-tech lynching? No, since no lynching happened. Thomas himself called it a lynching, which helped divert attention from the purpose of the hearings. It was a deft playing of the race card. Of course, the hearings did not call Thomas' intelligence into question, so your point is doubly irrelevant. Absent any real or manufactured scandal, Sotomayor is going to be confirmed on the merits. The only question is how ridiculous her opposition is willing to look in vainly opposing her. So far, the answer has been "pretty damn ridiculous." Ex: The title of this thread. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
tomcervo wrote:
On May 26, 10:22�pm, Annika1980 wrote: On May 26, 2:38�pm, wrote: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world -- bill-o It's funny watching the wingnuts scramble trying to find something to smear her with. What I have witnessed today are a bunch of right- wingers scrambling to find something to oppose this pick on without making it look like what it is .... politics as usual. I even heard one wingnut mouthpiece claim that Sotomayor was only appointed to the Federal bench by George Bush as some sort of political gesture of goodwill to the Democrats, the obvious implication being that she wasn't really qualified for the job. I mean, how can she be qualified .... she's a WOMAN for Chrissakes ... and a Latino! The irony is that had Obama appointed some old pasty white guy, as is the norm, all the Repugs would be crying, "Where's the change you promised? Same old politics as usual!" It's early in the game, but I haven't yet heard one person give a valid reason to oppose her. No doubt, the Repugs will try to dredge (or is that Drudge) up some out-of-context remarks she made in some decision years ago in an attempt to smear her, but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. She graduated Summa Cum Laude from Princeton. The wingers screaming above couldn't get into Princeton on the back of a garbage truck. Or the turnip trucks they keep falling off of, as the case may be. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 26-May-2009, "R&B" wrote: If you expect anything else from the one, you're not living in the real world Sucks being on the outside, doesn't it? I believe I can handle it w/o getting ugly or hysterical. As a believer in individual rights & reponsabilities I often differ with the heard. -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 26-May-2009, HK wrote: Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. Sounds like Brer Rabbit to me. If the GOP moves to the center, esp on fiscal and defense matters, you can just say whig. On the other hand I don't think the "values" issues are a real winner for the party of Lincoln. -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 26-May-2009, HK wrote: If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so. Exactly, if the need is there, it will be met. -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 26-May-2009, Annika1980 wrote: but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. mighty big assumption methinks! :-) -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 26-May-2009, Annika1980 wrote: No doubt, the Repugs will try to dredge (or is that Drudge) up some out-of-context remarks she made in some decision years ago in an attempt to smear her, but I suspect her confirmation will go fairly smoothly, assuming all her tax returns are in order. No need for out of context remarks: google Didden v Port Chester. Sotomeyer and her co-justices did a hellofa job here. -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 27-May-2009, Howard Brazee wrote: If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. You haven't noticed that they all wear gowns? NTTAWWT! -- bill-o |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 7:57*pm, Christopher Helms wrote:
On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
Project China Blue Book wrote:
In article , HK wrote: Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote: On May 26, 12:35 pm, HK wrote: The Limbaugh-Cheney wing of the GOP has no clout outside of the party and, in fact, is a perfect focus of ridicule. Seriously, who really gives a crap what the right-wingnut think or say about anything? Either the GOP moves to the center or...it dies. It could hang out on the margins indefinitely. The problem is there's no viable party to take it's place. The last thing we need is a one party system. If the people feel it necessary to start a new party or enliven an existing alternative to the GOP, they will do so. The Democrat party is its own opposition party. There is no "Democrat party." |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
Charlie wrote:
On May 26, 7:57 pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25 pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. The shift has nothing to do with "whitey," and everything to do with the incompetency of the Bush administration and the flaccidity of the GOP to help the middle class. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni."
wrote: On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
|
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
In article
, Charlie wrote: On May 26, 7:57*pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" none of your wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. Would you guys stop cross posting to rec.sport.golf, please? At least, until you have learnt some rudiments of the English language. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On Wed, 27 May 2009 08:07:53 -0700 (PDT), Charlie
wrote: On May 26, 7:57*pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. Will you be breaking out the windows on your media room when the darkies storm your neighborhood so you can have a clear shot? Ignorant loon. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On Wed, 27 May 2009 13:28:14 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2009 08:07:53 -0700 (PDT), Charlie wrote: On May 26, 7:57 pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25 pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. When that day arrives, God help us all. Will you be breaking out the windows on your media room when the darkies storm your neighborhood so you can have a clear shot? Ignorant loon. Are you implying "Charlie" is a relative of, say, Herring or Poontang3? He's likely find warm companionship with many of our fellow posters. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 8:10*am, wrote:
On May 26, 8:35*pm, "Kurgan. presented by Gringioni." wrote: On May 26, 7:03*pm, tonysin wrote: I know that conservatards don't care about facts, but where did you get that she is a lesbian? If she is one, then I'll say it's about time we had a gay Supreme Court Justice. There have been 110 Supreme Court Justices in this nation's history. Only two have been women. If there haven't been any gays, well, they're due. Justice Breyer is gay. As to Sotomayor's sexual preferences google: "Sotomayor lesbian" Martin Unless I missed it, Google shows nobody but right wingnuts claiming she's a lesbian, based only on the fact that she's not married. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance was disappointed that Obama did NOT nominate a gay or lesbian. |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 5:00*am, John Reddy wrote:
In article , *Tom wrote: Last week, they tried to make an issue of her intellect... she isn't smart enough to be a SC Justice... they'll say anything... it's shameful. It cuts both ways. Do you not remember the Clarence Thomas high-tech lynching? I was fairly tuned into the Clarence Thomas hearings as John Danforth was shepherding through the proceedings. Danforth was my Senator from MO, that's why I took interest in the hearings. I don't recall any 'liberal' pundits questioning his intelligence, as 'conservative' pundits have with Judge Sotomayor. Today, Newt Gingrich tweeted about her and called her a racist. The criticisms about Justice Thomas were about ideology and politics, not race or his I.Q. Tom |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On May 27, 10:07*am, Charlie wrote:
On May 26, 7:57*pm, Christopher Helms wrote: On May 26, 2:25*pm, "R&B" wrote: On 2009-05-26 14:38:03 -0400, said: On 26-May-2009, wrote: she is an arrogant flaming liberal". Why is it that conservatives like Thomas and Alito, who lean so far to the right that they're practically horizontal are considered "patriotic," rational people who will calmly uphold the letter of the law and anybody to the left of them is invariably described as a hyperventilating, extremist, ultra liberal? Why is it so hard to be a right wing extremist and so ****ing easy to be a left wing one? Because we all know it's payback time on whitey! *And to me Whites voting for minorities that are considered to be lefties will get what they deserve one day. *When that day arrives, God help us all. OK, I'll bite... what, exactly do we deserve to get one day? Tom |
Obama selects muff-munching liberal for SCOTUS.
On 27-May-2009, William Clark wrote: Would you guys stop cross posting to rec.sport.golf, please? At least, until you have learnt some rudiments of the English language. hear, hear! -- bill-o -- an opposition back bencher |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com