On Thu, 21 May 2009 06:27:06 -0600, "Canuck57"
wrote:


"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 21 May 2009 08:12:04 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
'It doesn't matter if the planet is cooling and plants need it to
live. We still have to ban carbon dioxide.'"

I am going to guess, and say Henry Waxman. Am I close?

DING DING DING!!

And your prize will be...

NOTHING!!

Can't make anything for you because of carbon emissions.

Sorry.

We could save some carbon emmisions and recycle the politicians? We could
use the politicians carbon to make boats, at least then they would be true
and useful.

Political carbon fiber?

No thanks.

I wonder when they are going to get around to taxing breathing though
- I mean there are 6 billion people on Earth - that's got to be
something to consider for cap and trade. A large source of carbon
emissions and, dare I say it, other "greenhouse" asses...er..gasses.

I mean think about it - how many times a year do you..um..blast a real
stinker - times six billion...wow, that's a lot of greenhouse gas
being emitted.

Espiecally after eating Chinese food. No wonder you can't see more
than a 1/2 mile on the average day in Bejing.