wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!

Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On May 19, 7:23*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. * ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? *Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. *I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. *I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. * I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. *I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". * It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!

Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. *On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're being too nice! Harry's WAY more than 300 pounds of blubber and
pustules.

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.




Have you noticed how fast recent history is repeating itself?

jim7856 wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives,
and no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have
and will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national
debt, under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described
as a conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used
today, and I probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in
Goldwater's era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters,
I do not agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I
thought the Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled
and tugged at by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats
behaving like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of
the pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.




Have you noticed how fast recent history is repeating itself?

Yes.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Tue, 19 May 2009 06:47:14 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.


It was Johnson who asked the question and there's no doubt he's an
unrepentant supporter of George Bush.

Since you've explain yourself, you can ask me any question you want
about Obama's spending policies and deficits.

On Tue, 19 May 2009 07:23:02 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!

Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

And you are Harry's 300 lb hemorrhoid.

jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 07:23:02 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!
Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

And you are Harry's 300 lb hemorrhoid.



Next time I am at the pharmacy, I'll get a tube of Preparation Reggie.

The funny thing about these dumb ****s like Reggie, Loogy, FloridaJim,
et cetera, is that they keep writing posts to me here, and I see maybe
one in 10 or one in 20, because I have them filtered. Well, I guess
wasting their time here is better for society than their other habit -
preying on small children in the neighborhood.

HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 07:23:02 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to
spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real
objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have
and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national
debt,
under ANY administration. I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today,
and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and
tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats
behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty
and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!
Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired
of Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a
300 lb hemorrhoid.

And you are Harry's 300 lb hemorrhoid.



Next time I am at the pharmacy, I'll get a tube of Preparation Reggie.

The funny thing about these dumb ****s like Reggie, Loogy, FloridaJim,
et cetera, is that they keep writing posts to me here, and I see maybe
one in 10 or one in 20, because I have them filtered. Well, I guess
wasting their time here is better for society than their other habit -
preying on small children in the neighborhood.

We're not wasting our time when we treat you to a constant heartburn.
Gotta love it.

On May 19, 12:26*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 07:23:02 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."





wrote:
wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. * ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? *Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. *I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. *I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. * I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. *I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". * It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!

Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. *On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

And you are Harry's 300 lb hemorrhoid.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You wouldn't notice a 300 pound hemorrhoid on Harry's fat nasty ass.

On May 19, 12:32*pm, HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 07:23:02 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On May 19, 6:47 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.
Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.
Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. * ADD is the
least of his problems.
That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.
Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.
Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.
End of story.
Got any credibility? *Don't think so.
This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. *I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. *I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. * I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. *I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". * It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!
Based upon jps's description of buttsniffing, do you ever get tired of
Harry's head being up your ass?

I can't imagine having to drag that lard ass around all day long. *On
the positive side, it is good exercise, even if it does feel like a 300
lb hemorrhoid.

And you are Harry's 300 lb hemorrhoid.

Next time I am at the pharmacy, I'll get a tube of Preparation Reggie.

The funny thing about these dumb ****s like Reggie, Loogy, FloridaJim,
et cetera, is that they keep writing posts to me here, and I see maybe
one in 10 or one in 20, because I have them filtered. Well, I guess
wasting their time here is better for society than their other habit -
preying on small children in the neighborhood.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then how in hell would you know we've been posting to you, idiot?