On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding.

I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy
back into the coffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4


Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes
along.

Pelosi is a red herring.

Bush & Cheney need to answer for their traitorous, illegal activities.

This is going to get uglier before it's over.

jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding.

I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy
back into the coffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4


Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes
along.

Pelosi is a red herring.

Bush & Cheney need to answer for their traitorous, illegal activities.

This is going to get uglier before it's over.

What's done is done. Focus on the illegal criminal acts being committed
right under your nose as we speak.

jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding.

I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy
back into the coffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4


Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes
along.

The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone.

Pelosi is a red herring.

Pelosi challenged the CIA and she will loose.

Bush & Cheney need to answer for their traitorous, illegal activities.

Bush and Cheney are gone, this is Pelosi's problem now. Looks like the
only one who has a leg to stand on complaint wise is Harmon. Harmon is
the only one who wrote a letter of protest to the CIA.

This is going to get uglier before it's over.

Dear Leader Obama whacked the hornets nest and the hornets didn't do
what they were told.

BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding.

I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy
back into the coffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4


Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes
along.

The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone.


Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the
FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable
gatherer/source of intel for years.

On May 15, 6:43*am, HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Disguised as your Speaker of the House, the Master Chef is stirring up
more pudding.

I believe it would be wise for your President-elect to stuff the mummy
back into the coffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwZa8jvNp4

Unfortunately, the CIA seems to be making up the record as it goes
along. *

The CIA doesn't like to be ****ed with, by anyone.

Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the
FBI. The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable
gatherer/source of intel for years.

Herr Krause. You should really change your job title to Pharaoh.
You're the "King of Denial"

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Too bad. The CIA is just another failed federal agency, just like the FBI.
The CIA is too damned political and has not been a reliable
gatherer/source of intel for years.


Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA?

Wow.

Eisboch

On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA?

They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the
fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind.

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA?

They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the
fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind.

The CIA is a "Bureaucracy" and it will be extremely difficult to
discipline and replace them and they know it. When they screw up they
will claim it was due to a lack of funding. Whose to argue, their inner
workings are classified and you can't debate them in public. It's a no
win situation.

On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:12 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA?

They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the
fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind.

I am not an apologist for the Caught In Act people, but it is the
nature of the business that successes tend to stay secret, while the
failures are often famous. Their true batting average is a bit
difficult to discern.

Casady

Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:12 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 08:07:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Now you are an expert on the inner workings of the CIA?
They have missed on some rather important work. Failing to predict the
fall of the Soviet Union, and WMDs come to mind.

I am not an apologist for the Caught In Act people, but it is the
nature of the business that successes tend to stay secret, while the
failures are often famous. Their true batting average is a bit
difficult to discern.

Casady


Indeed, and isn't that a wonderful way to hide the massive number of
intel failures.

Let's see...


Downfall of Batista
Bay of Pigs
Shah of Iran
Vietnam
Contras
Chile
PLO and its offshots
WMDs (well, who really knows)
And about a zillion more.


We'd be better served by 100 chimpanzees sitting in a room with
shortwave radios and typewriters.