jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.


You mean, "this" Reggie is more of a dirtbag than the former one? :)

On Fri, 15 May 2009 14:07:56 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

You mean, "this" Reggie is more of a dirtbag than the former one? :)

No, less.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry
again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Could Justhate be correct for once?
As far as Ditzy Dan,,,he doesn't use a little personal information...he
makes up crap about my son & posts it here. That's why he'll never escape
from my septic tank...at least not for long.

On May 15, 2:33*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...





On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry
again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. *It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. * It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. * Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Could Justhate be correct for once?
As far as Ditzy Dan,,,he doesn't use a little personal information...he
makes up crap about my son & posts it here. *That's why he'll never escape
from my septic tank...at least not for long.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What has DK made up?

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium


Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Fri, 15 May 2009 18:24:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

jps wrote:
t them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Sorry "Reggie", not buying.
Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

I guess I am missing something. I ask you a simple polite question and
you ask me if I am targeting you for buttsniffing.

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
t them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Sorry "Reggie", not buying.
Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

I guess I am missing something. I ask you a simple polite question and
you ask me if I am targeting you for buttsniffing.

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and as
you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap upside
the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that correct?
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no
way are to be considered flaws or defects

You do have a way with words. 8)