On Fri, 15 May 2009 18:24:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"