Obamanomics....
 

On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:20:28 -0400, DK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:51:05 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 20:29:38 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:50:21 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:15:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Then you should know it's legal and doesn't avoid anything other
than
double taxation.
How dare you use the "laws" to your advantage.
The same excuse used by all the tax scammers, "double taxation."

Capital gains shouldn't be taxed.

Estates shouldn't be taxed.

Roads should be paved with fairy dust.

Schools should be built with chocolate.

There should be no tax.

I know the kind of scammin' asshole that considers everything double
taxation.
So you are a C-corp? Dumb move.

Get back to me when the law changes. Until then - **** off.
I was and continue to be a C-corp. I have full control over pay,
expenses and retained earning.

I don't just take what's left over when the bills are paid.

Don't forget to pay your quarterly estimated payment on time.

We who support the president are very appreciative.
An S-corp is no different. You didn't know that?
S-corps pass through profits and losses to the shareholders whether
the earnings are retained or not.

If an s-corp retains earnings, you get taxed as if they were profits.

Not true in a c-corp.

Get it Mr. Smartass?
Whooosh!
Whoosh my ass.

Hey everybody, it's Dan the Prick time! He's home from the ****
hauling business and needs a little attention.

Welcome home Dan.

The **** handling business pays very well.



I only "handle" the **** jps serves here but he is becoming increasingly
boring and childish.

If I keep my nose to the grindstone, in a couple of years I may be
able to overtake you.

Obamanomics....
 

jps wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009 20:20:28 -0400, DK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:51:05 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009 20:29:38 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:50:21 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:15:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Then you should know it's legal and doesn't avoid anything other
than
double taxation.
How dare you use the "laws" to your advantage.
The same excuse used by all the tax scammers, "double taxation."

Capital gains shouldn't be taxed.

Estates shouldn't be taxed.

Roads should be paved with fairy dust.

Schools should be built with chocolate.

There should be no tax.

I know the kind of scammin' asshole that considers everything double
taxation.
So you are a C-corp? Dumb move.

Get back to me when the law changes. Until then - **** off.
I was and continue to be a C-corp. I have full control over pay,
expenses and retained earning.

I don't just take what's left over when the bills are paid.

Don't forget to pay your quarterly estimated payment on time.

We who support the president are very appreciative.
An S-corp is no different. You didn't know that?
S-corps pass through profits and losses to the shareholders whether
the earnings are retained or not.

If an s-corp retains earnings, you get taxed as if they were profits.

Not true in a c-corp.

Get it Mr. Smartass?
Whooosh!
Whoosh my ass.

Hey everybody, it's Dan the Prick time! He's home from the ****
hauling business and needs a little attention.

Welcome home Dan.
The **** handling business pays very well.


I only "handle" the **** jps serves here but he is becoming increasingly
boring and childish.

If I keep my nose to the grindstone, in a couple of years I may be
able to overtake you.

A perfect example.