|
Obamanomics....
On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
And going to Univ. of Kansas would explain why he lied and said he went to Yale! My uncle thought KU was a great place to work. He could afford a hundred acre place five miles out of town. Had three no upkeep horses. Dean of the law school wasn't a bad gig. I spent quite a bit of time at his place when I was a kid. KU has a much better location than Yale. Casady |
Obamanomics....
On May 18, 2:52*pm, Richard Casady
wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: And going to Univ. of Kansas would explain why he lied and said he went to Yale! My uncle thought KU was a great place to work. He could afford a hundred acre place five miles out of town. Had three no upkeep horses. Dean of the law school wasn't a bad gig. I spent quite a bit of time at his place when I was a kid. KU has a much better location than Yale. Casady Makes you wonder why Harry felt the need to lie then! |
Obamanomics....
Richard Casady wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: And going to Univ. of Kansas would explain why he lied and said he went to Yale! My uncle thought KU was a great place to work. He could afford a hundred acre place five miles out of town. Had three no upkeep horses. Dean of the law school wasn't a bad gig. I spent quite a bit of time at his place when I was a kid. KU has a much better location than Yale. Casady Indeed, but try to explain to **** for brains loogy the concept of getting one degree from university A and a second degree from university B. Maybe when loogy enrolls in a community college, someone might tell him about it. |
Obamanomics....
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote: wrote: Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk? LOL What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon intellectuality? Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women. Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy... Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so. http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ...as compared to mine;- http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html Pfffffttt. Idiots. The New Haven school system of nearly 50 years ago was quite a bit different than the school system today. Oh...I got a diploma from mine, **** for brains...but you dropped out, right? More like... 'kicked out'. |
Obamanomics....
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:52 -0400, HK wrote: wrote: Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk? LOL What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon intellectuality? Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women. The idiot freak attempts thinking. Not his stong suit. In cases of rape, the question isn't whether or not to have an abortion, it's a question of who decides. Who decides? BAR and the rest of the "conservatives" think the state should decide. Provide a cite where I have said the state should decide. I have told you what I believe. I have never told you nor anyone else what to believe or what to do. |
Obamanomics....
BAR wrote:
jps wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:52 -0400, HK wrote: wrote: Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk? LOL What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon intellectuality? Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women. The idiot freak attempts thinking. Not his stong suit. In cases of rape, the question isn't whether or not to have an abortion, it's a question of who decides. Who decides? BAR and the rest of the "conservatives" think the state should decide. Provide a cite where I have said the state should decide. I have told you what I believe. I have never told you nor anyone else what to believe or what to do. Who decides? The female who is pregnant. That's who decides. No one else's opinion matters in such a situation. Imagine having a brain-dead ****head like Justhate weighing in on such a decision. |
Obamanomics....
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:11:43 -0400, BAR wrote:
jps wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:52 -0400, HK wrote: wrote: Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk? LOL What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon intellectuality? Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women. The idiot freak attempts thinking. Not his stong suit. In cases of rape, the question isn't whether or not to have an abortion, it's a question of who decides. Who decides? The person who's body is affected. BAR and the rest of the "conservatives" think the state should decide. Provide a cite where I have said the state should decide. I have told you what I believe. I have never told you nor anyone else what to believe or what to do. I believe it's up to the person who's carrying. What do you believe? |
Obamanomics....
jps wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:15:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote: Then you should know it's legal and doesn't avoid anything other than double taxation. How dare you use the "laws" to your advantage. The same excuse used by all the tax scammers, "double taxation." Capital gains shouldn't be taxed. Estates shouldn't be taxed. Roads should be paved with fairy dust. Schools should be built with chocolate. There should be no tax. I know the kind of scammin' asshole that considers everything double taxation. So you are a C-corp? Dumb move. Get back to me when the law changes. Until then - **** off. |
Obamanomics....
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote: wrote: Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk? LOL What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon intellectuality? Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women. Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy... Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so. http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ...as compared to mine;- http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html Pfffffttt. Idiots. The New Haven school system of nearly 50 years ago was quite a bit different than the school system today. Oh...I got a diploma from mine, **** for brains...but you dropped out, right? More like... 'kicked out'. Always the little puppy. Nipping at your master's nasty heels. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com