On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:21:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 16, 3:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 14:52:32 -0400, BAR wrote:
jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 14:09:56 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 13:35:14 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 10:03:51 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:24:30 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:58:56 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 19:37:06 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:40:21 -0400, BAR wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On May 8, 8:22 am, BAR wrote:
... trickle up poverty.
the rich have just given us trickle down poverty

payback's a bitch
Rich people employ poor people. Poor people employ no one.
Poor people service rich people. *The world wouldn't work very well
without poor people. *Rich people are far more expendible, as the
French proved.
I am now forced to ask when are you going to go the way of the rich French?
I'm not rich. *I'm comfortable but far from rich.
Sucks to be you.
And you're clearly in the **** hauling business. *Can't stay away from
sniffing people's asses on usenet.
Where did you get that, fruitcake? *You know enough about what I do.
Remember the S corp discussion?

Sucks to be you.
I'm sure it's something equally as foul, as to match your personality.

I recall the S corp discussion wherein we established that its use by
you is for avoidance of the corporate tax rate.
As long as it is legal you have noting to whine about.
Just like torture.
Legal is legal regardless of the activity.
Subject to misinterpretation by the highest legal authorities in the
land.

It's also legal to have a PO box in the Cayman Islands to avoid
taxation in the US.

Doesn't make it any less scummy.
Scummy is not a legal opinion.

No, it's a moral choice.

I didn't know law was based upon morality? Who arbitrates morality
within the law?

Just like it's okay to torture but it's not okay to have Arab
translators in the military who admit to being gay.

Change the law. It is that simple.

When those whose interests are best served by leaving well enough
alone and they're the ones with the resources to sway opinion, guess
what happens.

That's right, the laws that would serve the greater good get thwarted.



Tax evaders are scummy, even if their methods are legal.

Killing babies still in the womb may be legal but it is scummy.

The knife cuts both ways.

Glad your wife or daughter were never raped and impregnated.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL

It's probably a given that a rape victim wouldn't wait until the
infant was viable before making the decision to abort.

Using my name is quite permissable in this case. :)
--

John H

On May 18, 10:45*am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?

Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.

Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...

Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.

http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good thing he got a great Yale education. Oh, wait, sorry, that's but
another of his lies.

On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:12:28 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 18, 9:09*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL

What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?

Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.

Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...

Quite an appropriate response. Why they try to equate saving the lives
of babies with the 'controlling' of women is beyond me.
--

John H

On May 18, 10:45*am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?

Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.

Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...

Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.

http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

....as compared to mine;-

http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pfffffttt.

wrote:
On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?
Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.
Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...
Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.
http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

...as compared to mine;-

http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pfffffttt.

That's hilarious.
You ought to post the stats side by side the next time he opens his fat
mouth.

wrote:
On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?
Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.
Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...
Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.
http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good thing he got a great Yale education. Oh, wait, sorry, that's but
another of his lies.

It does explain why he had to go to Univ. of Kansas.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On May 18, 12:49*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?
Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.
Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...
Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.
http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html

Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good thing he got a great Yale education. Oh, wait, sorry, that's but
another of his lies.

It does explain why he had to go to Univ. of Kansas.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.


And going to Univ. of Kansas would explain why he lied and said he
went to Yale!

wrote:
On May 18, 12:49 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 10:45 am, jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 18, 9:09 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL
What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?
Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.
Pffttt, screw you.. Go back to hiding under your desk dummy...
Got a high school diploma? Didn't think so.
http://www.psk12.com/rating/USindivp...year_2002.html
Pretty dismal ranking for Krause's high school.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good thing he got a great Yale education. Oh, wait, sorry, that's but
another of his lies.
It does explain why he had to go to Univ. of Kansas.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.


And going to Univ. of Kansas would explain why he lied and said he
went to Yale!

Ahhh Some of the Krause puzzle pieces are beginning to fit together.

On Mon, 18 May 2009 12:49:09 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


Good thing he got a great Yale education. Oh, wait, sorry, that's but
another of his lies.

It does explain why he had to go to Univ. of Kansas.

And this is what you do to add to the "dialogue."

On Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:52 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:

Pffffttt. I wonder what percent of abrotions are because of rape? It
is a red herring to be sure, intellectually dishonest, who'd a thunk?
LOL


What could be funnier than *you* trying to discuss something based upon
intellectuality?

Most men who oppose the right of women to seek safe abortions have one
thing in common: they feel the need to try to control women.

The idiot freak attempts thinking. Not his stong suit.

In cases of rape, the question isn't whether or not to have an
abortion, it's a question of who decides.

BAR and the rest of the "conservatives" think the state should decide.