On May 7, 11:12*am, "Don White" wrote:
"jim78565" wrote in message

...





jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...ITE=TNKNN&SECT...

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Now that you (JPS) have gone on record favoring the indiscriminate
bombings of Afghan civilians, I wonder if your brother Krause will follow
suit.

Hell...they should bomb half of Florida and clean it up for decent folk to
move there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Has anybody told you lately you are a bigototed asshole? You are!

jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DE FAULT


But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Bombing the right country? Would you care to explain why we are even in
Afghanistan?

On Fri, 08 May 2009 08:26:10 -0400, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DE FAULT


But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Bombing the right country? Would you care to explain why we are even in
Afghanistan?

If I have to it's a lost cause already.

Let me put it simply for you.

The guys that conspired to kill people in NY, Washington, Los Angeles
and elsewhere found safe harbor in the mountain of Afghanistan.

In collusion with the Taliban, they've now established strongholds
along the border with Pakistan, in both countries.

Now they're moving further into Pakistan which has a teetering
government. Pakistan has nuclear weapons.

Can you take it from there or will you require further hand holding?

On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:16:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DE FAULT

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.


Why is that.? We have never found a terrorist from Afghanistan. They
are mostly Saudis. But if we kill enough innocent Afghans we will
start seeing terrorists from there.

When is Obama going to honor his promise to stop the war?

He is starting to look like Nixon (who also ran on a promise to stop
the war and then expanded it)

Nixon did stop the war and so will Obama.

Are you in favor of Al Qaeda and the Taliban taking over Pakistan?

When I said "at least he's bombing the right country" it was meant as
tongue in cheek since our expectations of proper leadership have been
so eviscerated over the past eight years.

I stood against going into Afghanistan in the first place. The SU
proved that doing so was a fools errand. We need a surgical approach
to rooting out the lunatics who would love to get their hands on
Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Would that be a good thing?

Obama doesn't aim the cruise missles, he set the agenda.

On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:22:53 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:16:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DE FAULT

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.


Why is that.? We have never found a terrorist from Afghanistan. They
are mostly Saudis. But if we kill enough innocent Afghans we will
start seeing terrorists from there.

When is Obama going to honor his promise to stop the war?

He is starting to look like Nixon (who also ran on a promise to stop
the war and then expanded it)

Nixon did stop the war and so will Obama.

Are you in favor of Al Qaeda and the Taliban taking over Pakistan?

When I said "at least he's bombing the right country" it was meant as
tongue in cheek since our expectations of proper leadership have been
so eviscerated over the past eight years.

I stood against going into Afghanistan in the first place. The SU
proved that doing so was a fools errand. We need a surgical approach
to rooting out the lunatics who would love to get their hands on
Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Would that be a good thing?

Obama doesn't aim the cruise missles, he set the agenda.

Gosh, how your tune changes.

Obama is the Commander in Chief. It's his fault.

Remember words along those lines?

The word 'hypocritical' comes to mind.

Flake.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On May 7, 2:07*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:22:53 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:16:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...ITE=TNKNN&SECT...

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Why is that.? We have never found a terrorist from Afghanistan. They
are mostly Saudis. But if we kill enough innocent Afghans we will
start seeing terrorists from there.

When is Obama going to honor his promise to stop the war?

He is starting to look like Nixon (who also ran on a promise to stop
the war and then expanded it)

Nixon did stop the war and so will Obama.

Are you in favor of Al Qaeda and the Taliban taking over Pakistan?

When I said "at least he's bombing the right country" it was meant as
tongue in cheek since our expectations of proper leadership have been
so eviscerated over the past eight years.

I stood against going into Afghanistan in the first place. *The SU
proved that doing so was a fools errand. *We need a surgical approach
to rooting out the lunatics who would love to get their hands on
Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Would that be a good thing?

Obama doesn't aim the cruise missles, he set the agenda.

Gosh, how your tune changes.

Obama is the Commander in Chief. It's his fault.

Remember words along those lines?

The word 'hypocritical' comes to mind.

Flake.
--
John H

Funny how all the libs are becoming great apologists.

On Thu, 7 May 2009 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 7, 2:07*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:22:53 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:16:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...ITE=TNKNN&SECT...

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Why is that.? We have never found a terrorist from Afghanistan. They
are mostly Saudis. But if we kill enough innocent Afghans we will
start seeing terrorists from there.

When is Obama going to honor his promise to stop the war?

He is starting to look like Nixon (who also ran on a promise to stop
the war and then expanded it)

Nixon did stop the war and so will Obama.

Are you in favor of Al Qaeda and the Taliban taking over Pakistan?

When I said "at least he's bombing the right country" it was meant as
tongue in cheek since our expectations of proper leadership have been
so eviscerated over the past eight years.

I stood against going into Afghanistan in the first place. *The SU
proved that doing so was a fools errand. *We need a surgical approach
to rooting out the lunatics who would love to get their hands on
Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Would that be a good thing?

Obama doesn't aim the cruise missles, he set the agenda.

Gosh, how your tune changes.

Obama is the Commander in Chief. It's his fault.

Remember words along those lines?

The word 'hypocritical' comes to mind.

Flake.
--
John H

Funny how all the libs are becoming great apologists.

If Bush had half a brain, he'd have continued to focus on addressing
the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

We don't have that ****ing idiot in office any longer but through his
neglect the problems has gotten worse.

Thank goodness we have a level headed leader who'll focus on the
pivotal issues rather than illusory boogemen.

Anyone of you who'd like the Taliban to have control Pakistan's
nuclear weapons speak up now.

Or shut the **** up.