If you jump to the Democrats side of the aisle and intend on keeping
your committee seniority you had better toe the part line, otherwise,
you will be sitting at the end of the table.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/34648-1.html

On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:48:33 -0400, BAR wrote:

If you jump to the Democrats side of the aisle and intend on keeping
your committee seniority you had better toe the part line, otherwise,
you will be sitting at the end of the table.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/34648-1.html

The guy made a Faustian bargain to save his ass and now has to
reconcile the exchange.

Based on the comments over the past several days, he seems unteathered
from reality.

On Wed, 06 May 2009 00:03:06 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 05 May 2009 20:21:35 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:48:33 -0400, BAR wrote:

If you jump to the Democrats side of the aisle and intend on keeping
your committee seniority you had better toe the part line, otherwise,
you will be sitting at the end of the table.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/34648-1.html

The guy made a Faustian bargain to save his ass and now has to
reconcile the exchange.

Based on the comments over the past several days, he seems unteathered
from reality.


This reminds me of all of those bad movies you see with a guy who has
one foot on the dock and one foot in the untethered canoe.
I think he is going in the drink. It would really be ironic (and very
plausible) for him to lose to Ridge.
I can certainly see the Democrats being skeptical of his loyalty and
the Republicans already know.

Ridge may face Sestak in the general. Don't think the Dems are going
to abide the flopping around.