On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.

You should remember that it's already been shown that some of the most
avid anti-gun ultra-liberals have bodyguards that carry guns, or they
actually carry *themselves*. They want "joe public" to give up
theirs, while they keep their own guns around. It's not just a
conservative thing by any measure. Remember all those liberals in
obama's cabinet that didn't pay their taxes? They sure want us to,
eh?

"I don't care if you want to hunt, I don't care if you think it's your
right. I say, sorry, you are not allowed to own a gun, and if you do
own a gun I think you should go to prison." - Rosie O'Donnell (with
armed bodygards)

"The Constitution is a radical document... it is the job of the
government to rein in people's rights." - Bill Clinton (for effect)

Besides, my statement was mostly based on your actions and words here
over the last couple of months since you showed back up. You know,
when you're trying to act like you're superior, with a bigger house,
smarter wife, better screwdriver, and all that other BS you try to
spout. It gives us a glimpse inside your elitist "do as I say, not as
I do" mindset and attitude. harold was included because he owns guns,
but sides with you. No doubt, to a "T".

bunch of statements snipped

Hey, when you sober up you can make some sense. I agree, in
principle, with pretty much everything you stated. However, I don't
believe that you're being honest. You have presented yourself as
being far more radical both personally and in your beliefs, and the
fact that you dressed them up doesn't make *you* any more mainstream.
It's like putting lipstick on a pig, you know? Can't un-ring that
bell.

Maybe you just need to work on your presentation skills and honesty.
Try to keep the spittle down. :-

On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.

bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

Again, you didn't refute a single thing I said. Can you hear that?

You didn't cite a single example of what I'd take from you that I'm
unwilling to live with myself.

You didn't even endorse the civil liberties you're supposedly
guaranteed by law.

You're no American. You're a wet sock that's molding in the hamper.

On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. Cut from the same cloth as harold.

wrote:
On May 6, 2:07 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42 pm, jps wrote:
It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.
Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".
I disagree.
That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped
You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.


Refute? You mean dispute. Another self-congratulatory rightwing piece of
crap.

On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:17:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. That's all I wanted to do. Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. Cut from the same cloth as harold.

And what prey tell have I lied about?

You silly skank.

On May 6, 3:28*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:17:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 6, 2:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 9:59*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On May 5, 8:42*pm, jps wrote:

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Funny... you just described harold and yourself to a "T".

I disagree.

That's your right... and mine as well.
bunch of statements snipped

You're not funny and you didn't refute a single thing I said.

I had no intentio of being funny. *I meant what I wrote.

I didn't need to refute anything. *I did refute your statement that it
was conservatives that want to take away from everyone but
themselves. *That's all I wanted to do. *Done.

I wrote that I agree with pretty much all the other statements you
wrote. *I just don't believe that 'you' beleive them. *That's not your
platform, it's just your way to try to make yourself presentable.
Mission not accomplished.

You are a liar. *Cut from the same cloth as harold.

And what prey tell have I lied about?

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

As your spittle filled rants have shown, there is no way your agenda
is just the few basic statements you offered. There's far more to
your disturbed psyche than that. It's just a show; a lie. You're
attempting to hide your true colors.

Either that, or you're one the most bipolar people that haunts this NG.

On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.

On May 6, 4:50*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.

Uh, we pretty much unraveled your little screwdriver fantasy... You
twisted it worse than Donnie saying he saw pictures of Harrys Lobsta'
boat, or Harry saying his landlord was a Dr, Dr.... snerk You guys
can't even man up when you tell a lie...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:37:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

That would be "pray tell", oh mister high IQ.

You still haven't cited a single thing I've lied about you silly ass.

Go get a spanking from the little woman, you need it.


Unfortunately, the only spanking he'll be getting is from the Palm sisters!

jps wrote:

You didn't cite a single example of what I'd take from you that I'm
unwilling to live with myself.

Priceless. Are you on drugs?