On May 4, 6:44*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 4, 9:54 am, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..
*skull* * Hehehehe.

What a frippin' idiot.

If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.

*SKULL* * Sheeesh.

Most of the more educated folks here knew what I meant.. Of course if
you had anything but gas in your head you would have noticed your pink
army regular spelled dilemma wrong in the title of his troll thread...
But we know you are more interested in trolling than talking boats
anyway.

You claim to have been a builder of rowboats, ****-for-brains. Any real
builder of rowboats would be familiar with the word "scull." Anyone
familiar with rowboats knows the word "scull" and knows that "skull" and
"scull" are not the same word.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You claim to have been the writer of technical papers dealing with
structural building issues. Care to have a discussion right here on
those seismic and wind forces that you wrote about?