On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:57:27 -0700, Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Apr 30, 9:52*pm, Rabid Weasel Lawson law...@NO10909SPAM
+dayton.net wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:24:52 -0700, Don Stockbauer wrote:
On Apr 30, 8:20*pm, Rabid Weasel Lawson law...@NO10909SPAM
+dayton.net wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:26:42 -0700, wismel wrote:
This event is an advanced biological warfare event. It is far more
important than 9/11, and, by itself, could bring deaths in such
magnitudes as to exceed the number of deaths from all causes in the
Second World War.

This war is now known as Human Folly II.

Who cares what lunatics name things?

Apparently Bentham named his cane "dapple." *But no one cares and he was,
at least, "endearingly eccentric."

(IH)

I thought it was "Mortimer".

http://www.livingphilosophy.org.uk/E...ringe_2007.htm

"Bentham was a founder of University College London and today he is on
display there, seated in a chair with his walking stick, called Dapple,
lying across his legs, a replacement head on his shoulders and his real
head between his feet. This is how, in his will, he instructed his body
to be displayed when he died."

Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:20:01 -0400, Rabid Weasel Lawson
wrote:

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:26:42 -0700, wismel wrote:

This event is an advanced biological warfare event. It is far more
important than 9/11, and, by itself, could bring deaths in such
magnitudes as to exceed the number of deaths from all causes in the
Second World War.

This would be a lot more convincing if it weren't for the fact that this
variant of the Swine Flu is approximately 50 to 500 times *LESS* deadly
than the garden variety flu which kills up to 48,000 in the U.S. alone (as
the upper bounds). This Swine Flu, in contrast has killed a maximum of
about 200 people.

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people? Are you even considering the number of deaths in
proportion to the number of infections?



Interesting post,

Only to paranoid idiots.

(IH)

On May 1, 8:55*am, hal wrote:

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. *So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people? *Are you even considering the number of deaths in
proportion to the number of infections?

This is why I believe that Mexico has vastly under-reported the number
of infections. The mortality rate is too high.

-Mike K.

On Fri, 01 May 2009 08:55:25 -0700, mkornecki2000 wrote:

On May 1, 8:55*am, hal wrote:

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. *So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people? *Are you even considering the number of deaths in
proportion to the number of infections?

This is why I believe that Mexico has vastly under-reported the number
of infections. The mortality rate is too high.

-Mike K.

A few examples. Note how it seems to be not as bad as the media driven
hysteria:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090430/D97T2ALO1.html

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090501/D97TCOO00.html

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=103698986
3,000 people, 60% infection rate (1,800 infections), and how many deaths?
None to mention? Out of 1,800 infections? Wow, practically the 4th
Horseman, this Swine Flu is. :P

Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. *So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people? *Are you even considering the number of deaths in
proportion to the number of infections?

This is why I believe that Mexico has vastly under-reported the number
of infections. The mortality rate is too high.

More likely it's just the fact that Mexico had the initial infections;
a brand new virus combined with barely-adequate care skewing the
numbers. It's not uncommon to see a higher fatality rate at the
outset of a new strain.

On Fri, 01 May 2009 06:55:16 -0600, hal wrote:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:20:01 -0400, Rabid Weasel Lawson
wrote:

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:26:42 -0700, wismel wrote:

This event is an advanced biological warfare event. It is far more
important than 9/11, and, by itself, could bring deaths in such
magnitudes as to exceed the number of deaths from all causes in the
Second World War.

This would be a lot more convincing if it weren't for the fact that this
variant of the Swine Flu is approximately 50 to 500 times *LESS* deadly
than the garden variety flu which kills up to 48,000 in the U.S. alone (as
the upper bounds). This Swine Flu, in contrast has killed a maximum of
about 200 people.

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people?


Less than 200, actually. And That's not what I'm saying that's what
*epidemiologists* are saying. And yes, it's true. *THIS* version of H1N1
(there are many) really *IS* less deadly than the garden variety H1N1
which hits every year. Apparently far less infectious too. This version
of H1N1 has been operating approximately 1/2 the time of regular flu
season so far and has still has only managed to rack up 1/100 the deaths
WORLDWIDE that the garden variety flu manages in the U.S. alone.
Depending on which stats, garden variety flu kills 36,000 people in the
U.S. and 500,000 worldwide every year.


http://www.latimes.com/features/heal...,3606923.story


Are you even considering the number of deaths in
proportion to the number of infections?

Yes, epidemiologists are considering that. The problem is that you are an
ill-informed moron who is easily scared by soundbytes.

(IH)

This would be a lot more convincing if it weren't for the fact that this
variant of the Swine Flu is approximately 50 to 500 times *LESS* deadly
than the garden variety flu which kills up to 48,000 in the U.S. alone (as
the upper bounds). *This Swine Flu, in contrast has killed a maximum of
about 200 people.

Wow, you say some pretty stupid **** but this takes the cake. *So you
conclusion is H1N1 is not as lethal because SO FAR it has only killed
200 people? *

It hasn't killed 200 people so far; it has killed 13 people so far.
Twelve of those people died in Mexico, most likely due to insufficient
treatment; the thirteenth was a child who came FROM Mexico. The vast
majority of cases are already recovering.

Obviously there is cause for concern because of it being a new strain,
but frankly the media is hyping it a bit.

Are you even considering the number of deaths in proportion to the number of infections?

Are you considering that 12 out 13 of the deaths were people who were
infected before any real response was initiated?

It is not uncommon for a higher ratio of deaths at the very outset of
a new strain; the true fatality rate needs to be taken over a much
broader range of cases. In the countries outside of Mexico, the
fatality rate has been very low thus far.

wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:25:01 -0700, news wrote:
The Virus Appears Man Made

This Swine Flu is not a naturally-occurring event, but instead is an
Advanced Biological Warfare recombination-DNA-genetically-engineered
virus. Young healthy adults seem to be the most at risk. This virus is
genetically spliced off the 1918 Spanish Flu.

The new Mexican Swine Flu has elements of DNA from the following:
avian flu, human flu Type A, human flu Type B, Asian swine flu, and
European swine flu. A strange combination never seen before and having
less than 1/10% chance of being a natural event.

Figure the odds on human and animal viruses from four or more
continents suddenly recombining into a new flu, during a non-flu
season, that spreads from human-to-human with a 10% fatality rating?

A Deliberate Event

This new flu is a lab-created advanced biological warfare DNA
genetically engineered virus, and it appears to be deliberately
released.

This event is an advanced biological warfare event. It is far more
important than 9/11, and, by itself, could bring deaths in such
magnitudes as to exceed the number of deaths from all causes in the
Second World War.

Interesting post, time will tell origin of virus.
ted


Nope. The mathematics have already told. It is extremely
improbable that elements of DNA from the aforementioned disparate
sources could have combined outside of a lab (eg. military lab). Given
the other associated hard and circumstantial evidence (Tamiflu/Rumsfeld;
Baxter's criminal actions a few months ago when they mixed the live H5N1
bird flu virus in flu vaccine; documented neoeugenics indoctrination
amongst the powermad elites; history of bioweapon usage authorized by
said elites; mainstream media dishonesty in reporting about 9/11/2001
and the anthrax letter origins; etc.) ... the verdict is pretty clear
and a matter of accounting.


-zookumar-
ps: www.infowars.com

zookumar yelubandi wrote:

Nope. The mathematics have already told. It is extremely
improbable that elements of DNA from the aforementioned disparate
sources could have combined outside of a lab (eg. military lab). Given
the other associated hard and circumstantial evidence (Tamiflu/Rumsfeld;
Baxter's criminal actions a few months ago when they mixed the live H5N1
bird flu virus in flu vaccine; documented neoeugenics indoctrination
amongst the powermad elites; history of bioweapon usage authorized by
said elites; mainstream media dishonesty in reporting about 9/11/2001
and the anthrax letter origins; etc.) ... the verdict is pretty clear
and a matter of accounting.


You're numb as a boot... stupid, as well as venally disposed.
That your for hearing

Mark

Mark Goldberg wrote:
zookumar yelubandi wrote:

Nope. The mathematics have already told. It is extremely
improbable that elements of DNA from the aforementioned disparate
sources could have combined outside of a lab (eg. military lab). Given
the other associated hard and circumstantial evidence (Tamiflu/Rumsfeld;
Baxter's criminal actions a few months ago when they mixed the live H5N1
bird flu virus in flu vaccine; documented neoeugenics indoctrination
amongst the powermad elites; history of bioweapon usage authorized by
said elites; mainstream media dishonesty in reporting about 9/11/2001
and the anthrax letter origins; etc.) ... the verdict is pretty clear
and a matter of accounting.

You're numb as a boot... stupid, as well as venally disposed.
That your for hearing
Mark

Speak English, nattering neoCon neanderthal.

-zookumar-
www.infowars.com