http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/447862?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews. aol.com%2Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

On Apr 27, 9:11*pm, wrote:
http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I saw that on the news earlier.

I think it was a case of poor judgement on someones part.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oQxH9J35T8

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Apr 27, 9:11 pm, wrote:
http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I saw that on the news earlier.

I think it was a case of poor judgement on someones part.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oQxH9J35T8
-----

Looks like good olde government feels expempt in saving money. Blowing
money out the door like no tomorrow. People aught to start to think that
maybe government has too much of our money and is too liberal at spending
it.

An intern on a PC could have cut and pasted a picture together without two
loads of fuel, wear and tear and what is more likely a PR stunt to take our
minds off of the huge waste of cash they are planing for corruption-auto.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/447862?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews. aol.com%2Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves.
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Apr 27, 9:11*pm, wrote:
http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

Odd. Herr Krause hasn't offered to tell how this was totally justified.

On Apr 28, 6:46*am, wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:11*pm, wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Fartic le%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

Odd. Herr Krause hasn't offered to tell how this was totally justified.

And to think, this happened under Your President elect's watch. Does
that mean that he is to be blamed? The papers say that When he heard
of this, your President was "furious!"

"Furious?"

Why should he be upset, when his underlings were only wishing to put
his transport in a photo opportunity and to scare people while
wasting a healthy load of your tax money.

Your former president Bush caught hell for far less to the point that
it seemed fashionable to fault him for everything wrong in ones life.
Just ask Herr Krause.

But Herr Krause will justify this action somehow. Yea, because the
newly elected American El Supremo can do no wrong.

On Apr 28, 8:00*am, wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:46*am, wrote:

On Apr 27, 9:11*pm, wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478....link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle% 2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-*panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

Odd. Herr Krause hasn't offered to tell how this was totally justified.

And to think, this happened under Your President elect's watch. Does
that mean that he is to be blamed? The papers say that When he heard
of this, your President was "furious!"

"Furious?"

Why should he be upset, when his underlings were only wishing to put
his transport in a photo opportunity and *to scare people while
wasting a healthy load of your tax money.

Your former president Bush caught hell for far less to the point that
it seemed fashionable to fault him for everything wrong in ones life.
Just ask Herr Krause.

But Herr Krause will justify this action somehow. Yea, because the
newly elected American *El Supremo can do no wrong.

Well, the only problem I have with your statements is suggesting that
Obama was "elected".. 8 years of organized and well funded (our money)
went into promoting voter fraud. Ohio was won by ACORN, not Obama...

The most corrupt congress in history, holding hands with the most
criminal administration in history, we're screwed!

On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478....main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2 Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:46 am, wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:11 pm, wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Fartic le%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862
The brilliance recognises no boundaries.
Odd. Herr Krause hasn't offered to tell how this was totally justified.

And to think, this happened under Your President elect's watch. Does
that mean that he is to be blamed? The papers say that When he heard
of this, your President was "furious!"

"Furious?"

Why should he be upset, when his underlings were only wishing to put
his transport in a photo opportunity and to scare people while
wasting a healthy load of your tax money.

Your former president Bush caught hell for far less to the point that
it seemed fashionable to fault him for everything wrong in ones life.
Just ask Herr Krause.

But Herr Krause will justify this action somehow. Yea, because the
newly elected American El Supremo can do no wrong.

What was the carbon footprint of this photo-op?

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:13:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

No, we're talking about airplanes and New York. The recovery is
working, but has to do with capitalism, not Obama's socialism. Obama's
'fixes' are simply a ruse to get the government bigger and raise
taxes.

What about the deal you presented yesterday? I responded, but you
became mum.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm