On Apr 28, 2:05*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:00:35 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:46*am, wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:11*pm, wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478....link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle% 2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-*panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

Odd. Herr Krause hasn't offered to tell how this was totally justified..

And to think, this happened under Your President elect's watch. Does
that mean that he is to be blamed? The papers say that When he heard
of this, your President was "furious!"

"Furious?"

Why should he be upset, when his underlings were only wishing to put
his transport in a photo opportunity and *to scare people while
wasting a healthy load of your tax money.

Your former president Bush caught hell for far less to the point that
it seemed fashionable to fault him for everything wrong in ones life.
Just ask Herr Krause.

But Herr Krause will justify this action somehow. Yea, because the
newly elected American *El Supremo can do no wrong.

Oh yeah, our former president caught hell for wasting trillions in
borrowed money to fight an ill-conceived war in order to engage in
nation building.

The Pentagon, the CIA, the press and American goosesteppers were all
aligned.

You're going to blame this on Obama? *You think he personally ordered
the photo op and told folks not to inform NYers?

Sheesh, grasping at straws has become a national past time for
"conservatives."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Geeze, why do you think this new "open administration" has refused to
reveal the "guest list" for the flyover, could it have been more pay
for play Chicago politics and paybacks?

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/447862?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews. aol.com%2Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves.
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478....main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2 Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:13:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

No, we're talking about airplanes and New York. The recovery is
working, but has to do with capitalism, not Obama's socialism. Obama's
'fixes' are simply a ruse to get the government bigger and raise
taxes.

What about the deal you presented yesterday? I responded, but you
became mum.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Apr 28, 12:02*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:13:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Fartic le%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-t*otal-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

No, we're talking about airplanes and New York. The recovery is
working, but has to do with capitalism, not Obama's socialism. Obama's
'fixes' are simply a ruse to get the government bigger and raise
taxes.

How do you know that?

What about the deal you presented yesterday? I responded, but you
became mum.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Because it's apples and oranges.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:16:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Apr 28, 12:02*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:13:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:41*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Fartic le%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-t*otal-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

No. Really? You mean, like, if Bush were in charge there would be some
criticism of the President by Brian Williams or Keith?

--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

Do you mean like blaming Obama for the economy debacle that happened
under Bush's watch? By the way, you do realize that there are signs
that Obama's recovery plans are working, don't you?

No, we're talking about airplanes and New York. The recovery is
working, but has to do with capitalism, not Obama's socialism. Obama's
'fixes' are simply a ruse to get the government bigger and raise
taxes.

How do you know that?

I'm not blinded by Brian Williams and the other guys who gave Obama
more news coverage than Clinton and Bush combined got in their first
100 days.

What about the deal you presented yesterday? I responded, but you
became mum.
--

Still mum, huh? Is this a self-control thing, or what?

John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Because it's apples and oranges.

--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/447862?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews. aol.com%2Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves.
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

The person in charge should be fired or step down.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:40:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:07 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/447862?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews. aol.com%2Farticle%2Flow-flying-planes-create-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves.
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

The person in charge should be fired or step down.

The person in charge is named Obama.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Apr 28, 12:43*am, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:11:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
http://news.aol.com/article/low-flying-planes-create-total-panic/4478...main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2F article%2Flow-flying-planes-crea*te-total-panic%2F447862

The brilliance recognises no boundaries.

I am still not sure why this was "confidential". There were no
important people on the plane they were protecting. Why not make a PR
thing out of it, like the Blue Angels.
If people knew they were coming they could have got good press out of
this instead of making fools out of themselves. *
I can see why Obama was ****ed.
In another administration there might have been criticism about who is
in charge here.

How do you know who was on the plane? The admin. has refused to
disclose the manifest... Sounds to me like somebody got a govt funded
guided tour, maybe the head of GE or ACORN?