On Apr 18, 1:55*am, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:50:05 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Apr 17, 3:08*pm, HK wrote:

I spent close to a month in south Florida after Andrew preparing a
booklet for a client on how various structures handled the storm and its
aftermath. Hope I still have a few copies of it somewhere.

Gee, I do too! I'd love to see a copy, liar!

It was pretty
decent, with lots of photos, a few drawings, explanations, all reviewed
by the proper sort of engineers. Codes and lack of code enforcement were
big issues in south Florida then.

No it wasn't "codes and lack of code enforcement". There were codes in
place. They were enforced. But things are learned by such events and
the subsequent testing. THEN the codes are revised.

I'll be waiting to see your thesis. Please, don't forget to list the
engineers that reviewed it. Did they stamp it? How was their review
done?

I don't want to get in the ****ing match but Harry is somewhat right
on this one. A lot of the houses the got blown up in Andrew did not
meet the existing code but Dade did have the strongest code in Florida
at the time.
They found things like roof sheathing with about 10-15% of the
required nailing schedule and such. The inspectors were not really
inspecting. That is the type of thing that did get addressed. Florida
has always had a fairy strict code, when it was enforced. My 1963
house has a poured bond beam with 2 #5s in it and embedded straps over
the trusses.
In my addition we did get to bust into some of that for a look. The
slab also has the two #5 perimeter steel and the dowelled cells in the
walls. That is basically what the current code is and happened almost
a half century ago. It was all in who built your house.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Codes evolve. What was in place during a particular house's
construction may not be the same as one that was built even a year
later. If a house isn't built to code, first they start looking at the
engineer and architect. If there construction documents were in
compliance with the code at the time of construction, then they go to
the builder. As for a bond beam at the top of a c.m.u. wall, that's
standard, it stiffens the wall. As for the embedments, they are just
as much for the wall as for the trusses. The diaphram action of the
trusses help keep the wall from pushing over. Poured and reinforced
cells in the wall (simply put) keep the wall from breaking off at at
some height. Horizontal joint reinforcing stiffens the wall in a side
to side direction.