Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote:
What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 12:08*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. If your construction union buddies told you that, they are idiots. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with termites. The piers and load bearing walls are concrete. There are several advantages in a warm, moist area. Helps keep moisture levels down, creating a draft under the house helps cool it. Easier to get to plumbing than slab-on-grade and on and on. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. The posts do not contact the ground. At least according to code. Seeing the damage after Katrina, lots of the lost houses were because of construction practices. A house on a concrete pad. Not bad, but they did not bolt the house to the pad. You would see a house pad, and no nails, no bolts sticking up from the pad. Bad union work? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 2:36*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. The posts do not contact the ground. *At least according to code. *Seeing the damage after Katrina, lots of the lost houses were because of construction practices. *A house on a concrete pad. *Not bad, but they did not bolt the house to the pad. *You would see a house pad, and no nails, no bolts sticking up from the pad. *Bad union work? You even have to have a different coating on screws, nails and anchor bolts that will be in contact with PT lumber because of the newer chemicals they are using. I'm sure Harry's union worker buds that he has protect him (allegedly) have told him this. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. The posts do not contact the ground. At least according to code. Seeing the damage after Katrina, lots of the lost houses were because of construction practices. A house on a concrete pad. Not bad, but they did not bolt the house to the pad. You would see a house pad, and no nails, no bolts sticking up from the pad. Bad union work? More likely some shifty 'contractor' hiring illegals at the cheapest possible wage and taking every shortcut imaginable. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. The posts do not contact the ground. At least according to code. Seeing the damage after Katrina, lots of the lost houses were because of construction practices. A house on a concrete pad. Not bad, but they did not bolt the house to the pad. You would see a house pad, and no nails, no bolts sticking up from the pad. Bad union work? More likely some shifty 'contractor' hiring illegals at the cheapest possible wage and taking every shortcut imaginable. That would be "Bilious Bill's Fly By Night Home Repairs," where every worker is from the HomeDepot shape-up lot. In this country, very, very few workers under a union contract are involved on-site single family house construction. That sort of work typically is done on a piece-work basis, and most of it these days is done by semi-skilled foreign workers, who have displaced the semi-skilled U.S. construction workers. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 3:14 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message om... Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 17, 11:25 am, "mmc" wrote: What a novel idea:http://www.raisedfloorliving.com/ Like this is something new? No, this is traditional "Cracker house" construction. My house is built this way. Not unusual in areas with high water tables...and gives the termites something beefy - the posts - on which to chew. The posts do not contact the ground. At least according to code. Seeing the damage after Katrina, lots of the lost houses were because of construction practices. A house on a concrete pad. Not bad, but they did not bolt the house to the pad. You would see a house pad, and no nails, no bolts sticking up from the pad. Bad union work? More likely some shifty 'contractor' hiring illegals at the cheapest possible wage and taking every shortcut imaginable. Traditional cracker houses were built up off the ground for cooling breezes and because it gave the dogs and chickens somewhere to go when it rained. My house was built that way but was later air conditioned so the cooling effect is gone. The dogs and cats do go under there during storms. It is on 6" X 6" PT posts about 3' off grade with latticework around it. Building code was non-existent when it was built. When I first bought it in 1988, it got to 8 degrees here in Tallahassee and I had to learn to solder copper pipe on Christmas eve night. There was no insulation on the pipes. Our later addition was built with an amazing amount of steel in the concrete piers for hurricane code with hurricane straps everywhere. The later carport is a fortress compared to the rest of the house. My parents house was also built this way but it was enclosed with block underneath. My neighbors all have houses on pads and have had trouble with termites from under the pad, I have had no termite problems. Some have also had pipes break under the pad, what a pain. I'd rather be off grade. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|