BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   American crew retakes ship (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/103933-american-crew-retakes-ship.html)

HK April 8th 09 04:13 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's captain.
The plot thickens.





U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

Eisboch[_4_] April 8th 09 06:21 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



D.Duck April 8th 09 06:55 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's captain.
The plot thickens.



Pittman Pirate April 8th 09 08:17 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's
captain. The plot thickens.




U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time


I hope the companies rethink their attitude towards an unarmed crew. And I
hope the best for the captain.



Calif Bill April 8th 09 09:12 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's
captain. The plot thickens.




U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time


I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and
line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail
will head to the sea.



D.Duck April 8th 09 09:37 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy


AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's
captain. The plot thickens.




U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time


I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship
and line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the
rail will head to the sea.



Do you think the captains captors care? (say that fast three times)



HK April 8th 09 11:00 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and
line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail
will head to the sea.

I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something
that might have made sense.
"Where are the Marines?"
Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass
when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold.
Take no prisoners.
I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and
"environmental" considerations.
Sticky problem. The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably
studied to make these kinds of decisions.
Remember the Q-ships? Merchant ships with hidden guns.
Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie.
Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before.
Might take a land assault to stop it this time.
It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're
back to the same problem.
Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli.
There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with.

--Vic



The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

Eisboch[_4_] April 8th 09 11:03 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...

I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something
that might have made sense.
"Where are the Marines?"
Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass
when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold.
Take no prisoners.
I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and
"environmental" considerations.
Sticky problem. The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably
studied to make these kinds of decisions.
Remember the Q-ships? Merchant ships with hidden guns.
Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie.
Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before.
Might take a land assault to stop it this time.
It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're
back to the same problem.
Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli.
There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with.

--Vic



Interestingly, the first military action taken by the United States after
we became an independent nation was against the Barbary pirates who were
doing exactly the same thing then as the Somali pirates are doing today.
They were capturing European ships and demanding ransom payments. They
then began attacking US ships. At first Congress appropriated money to be
paid as ransom but Thomas Jefferson had some balls and led the effort to
confront them. We didn't really have a global Navy at the time, but what
we had were sent to the Med and they took care of business.

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/collecti.../mtjprece.html

Eisboch


Eisboch[_4_] April 8th 09 11:09 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.



The reason this nonsense continues is because ransoms are paid.

I know what Ronald Reagan would do.
I know what George H.W. Bush would do.
I know what George W. Bush would do.
Hell, I can even guess what Bill Clinton would do.

But, I can't begin to predict what Obama would or will do.
After all, it's only money.

Thomas Jefferson had the right idea.

Eisboch


HK April 8th 09 11:16 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a
commodity much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.



The reason this nonsense continues is because ransoms are paid.

I know what Ronald Reagan would do.
I know what George H.W. Bush would do.
I know what George W. Bush would do.
Hell, I can even guess what Bill Clinton would do.

But, I can't begin to predict what Obama would or will do.
After all, it's only money.

Thomas Jefferson had the right idea.

Eisboch



I think it really stupid to assault a ship commanded by pirates when the
crews' lives are at stake. On the other hand, if there are pirates
approaching or leaving the ship, and they are not carrying hostages,
well, they are fair game. We obviously need to task some satellites to
watch the Somali coast and any small boats heading way offshore. We can
do that in real time, and dispatch naval aircraft to ward off any small
boats that get too close. We can do this at night, too.

What would George W. Bush do? Get a few thousand Americans killed.



--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

HK April 8th 09 11:17 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:00:01 -0400, HK wrote:


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


Yep. That's what has to be kept in mind.
Very easy to get hotheaded about it.
I wanted Carter to give me a rifle and a parachute and drop me into
Tehran back then. With others of course.
Would have been a bloody mess.
The chopper mission might have proved a disaster if they had made
it to the embassy.
So far the pirates haven't killed anybody.
They don't want to mess up a good thing.
But there's some question about where the many millions of money
extorted are going. Terrorists or Wall Street probably.
But I repeat myself.

--Vic



There's not much difference between the terrorists and Wall Street.
They're all pirates.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

Eisboch[_4_] April 8th 09 11:21 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.



The reason this nonsense continues is because ransoms are paid.

I know what Ronald Reagan would do.
I know what George H.W. Bush would do.
I know what George W. Bush would do.
Hell, I can even guess what Bill Clinton would do.

But, I can't begin to predict what Obama would or will do.
After all, it's only money.

Thomas Jefferson had the right idea.

Eisboch



I think it really stupid to assault a ship commanded by pirates when the
crews' lives are at stake. On the other hand, if there are pirates
approaching or leaving the ship, and they are not carrying hostages, well,
they are fair game. We obviously need to task some satellites to watch the
Somali coast and any small boats heading way offshore. We can do that in
real time, and dispatch naval aircraft to ward off any small boats that
get too close. We can do this at night, too.

What would George W. Bush do? Get a few thousand Americans killed.




I didn't say that. We don't need to put the crew of a captured ship at
further risk.
But, we can take action against the warlords that organize these attacks.

Eisboch


HK April 8th 09 11:31 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


Interestingly, the first military action taken by the United States after
we became an independent nation was against the Barbary pirates who were
doing exactly the same thing then as the Somali pirates are doing today.
They were capturing European ships and demanding ransom payments. They
then began attacking US ships. At first Congress appropriated money to be
paid as ransom but Thomas Jefferson had some balls and led the effort to
confront them. We didn't really have a global Navy at the time, but what
we had were sent to the Med and they took care of business.

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/collecti.../mtjprece.html


The Barbary states were pushovers compared with Somalia.
No leaders in Somalia.
The only answer I see is to make pirating suicidal.
One tactic might be to carpet bomb any port where ships are held
captive - after the ships are ransomed of course.
But it will generate very bad publicity and all kinds of hand
wringing.

--Vic




I dunno, Vic. It seems when we use our brawn instead of our brains on
these failed states, we seem to make it easier for terrorists and despots.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

Vic Smith April 8th 09 11:38 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and
line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail
will head to the sea.

I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something
that might have made sense.
"Where are the Marines?"
Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass
when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold.
Take no prisoners.
I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and
"environmental" considerations.
Sticky problem. The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably
studied to make these kinds of decisions.
Remember the Q-ships? Merchant ships with hidden guns.
Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie.
Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before.
Might take a land assault to stop it this time.
It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're
back to the same problem.
Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli.
There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with.

--Vic

BAR[_2_] April 8th 09 11:43 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and
line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail
will head to the sea.

I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something
that might have made sense.
"Where are the Marines?"
Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass
when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold.


The Marines are not trained to handle this type of operation. The Navy
SEALs are better trained and equipped to respond to these situations.
Marine small units are platoons, 40 men, SEAL small units are 8 to 10
men. The logistics of the SEAL team make them much easier to deploy and
manage in the field.

Take no prisoners.


I agree, turn the pirates into shark food.

I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and
"environmental" considerations.


The sharks would spit out the pirates?

Sticky problem. The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably
studied to make these kinds of decision


Remember the Q-ships? Merchant ships with hidden guns.
Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie.
Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before.


That took resolve and a back bone to make a decision.

Might take a land assault to stop it this time.


Tripoli was a land assault.

It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're
back to the same problem.


Piracy and terrorism will never go away.

Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli.


Somalia is giant leap back to the 7th century.

There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with.


There was leader to threaten with death.

Pittman Pirate April 8th 09 11:49 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


True. And to continue to send unarmed men into these situations in these
areas is plain stupidity. We have US naval vessels all over the globe doing
such things as jellyfish research, listening, and retesting something they
tested 2,000 times before. It would be nothing to station vessels on patrol
in that area of the world, and to handle these situations as they come up.
If a SEAL can't handle a skinny terrorist with an antiquated RPG, he should
turn in his flippers.

They're going to keep doing this as long as we keep allowing it. Hussein
isn't going to do anything about it, so it is up to the company owners. A
few more paid ABSs wouldn't add that much cost. They'd be private employees
operating no soverign property.



Eisboch[_4_] April 9th 09 12:09 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Pittman Pirate" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


True. And to continue to send unarmed men into these situations in these
areas is plain stupidity. We have US naval vessels all over the globe
doing such things as jellyfish research, listening, and retesting
something they tested 2,000 times before. It would be nothing to station
vessels on patrol in that area of the world, and to handle these
situations as they come up. If a SEAL can't handle a skinny terrorist with
an antiquated RPG, he should turn in his flippers.


Haven't spent that much time in the blue water, huh?
Mighty small ships in gigantic oceans. We have ships patrolling
the normal shipping lanes, but this event happened about 300 miles
from the nearest Naval vessel according to the reports.
Furthermore, there were apparently about 150 cargo ships transiting
the general area at the time. Which do you protect?

Eisboch


Eisboch[_4_] April 9th 09 12:13 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


Interestingly, the first military action taken by the United States
after we became an independent nation was against the Barbary pirates
who were doing exactly the same thing then as the Somali pirates are
doing today. They were capturing European ships and demanding ransom
payments. They then began attacking US ships. At first Congress
appropriated money to be paid as ransom but Thomas Jefferson had some
balls and led the effort to confront them. We didn't really have a
global Navy at the time, but what we had were sent to the Med and they
took care of business.

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/collecti.../mtjprece.html


The Barbary states were pushovers compared with Somalia.
No leaders in Somalia.
The only answer I see is to make pirating suicidal.
One tactic might be to carpet bomb any port where ships are held
captive - after the ships are ransomed of course.
But it will generate very bad publicity and all kinds of hand
wringing.

--Vic




I dunno, Vic. It seems when we use our brawn instead of our brains on
these failed states, we seem to make it easier for terrorists and despots.


So what is the solution? Call a meeting and ask them politely to please
stop doing this?
Or, we do what was done back in the Barbary days and negotiate an annual
payment to the pirates to ensure safe passage of our ships? That's what
most of
Europe was doing in those days.

Eisboch


Vic Smith April 9th 09 12:13 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:00:01 -0400, HK wrote:



The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


Yep. That's what has to be kept in mind.
Very easy to get hotheaded about it.
I wanted Carter to give me a rifle and a parachute and drop me into
Tehran back then. With others of course.
Would have been a bloody mess.
The chopper mission might have proved a disaster if they had made
it to the embassy.
So far the pirates haven't killed anybody.
They don't want to mess up a good thing.
But there's some question about where the many millions of money
extorted are going. Terrorists or Wall Street probably.
But I repeat myself.

--Vic

Vic Smith April 9th 09 12:24 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:



Interestingly, the first military action taken by the United States after
we became an independent nation was against the Barbary pirates who were
doing exactly the same thing then as the Somali pirates are doing today.
They were capturing European ships and demanding ransom payments. They
then began attacking US ships. At first Congress appropriated money to be
paid as ransom but Thomas Jefferson had some balls and led the effort to
confront them. We didn't really have a global Navy at the time, but what
we had were sent to the Med and they took care of business.

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/collecti.../mtjprece.html


The Barbary states were pushovers compared with Somalia.
No leaders in Somalia.
The only answer I see is to make pirating suicidal.
One tactic might be to carpet bomb any port where ships are held
captive - after the ships are ransomed of course.
But it will generate very bad publicity and all kinds of hand
wringing.

--Vic

Jim22208 April 9th 09 12:31 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a
commodity much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.



The reason this nonsense continues is because ransoms are paid.

I know what Ronald Reagan would do.
I know what George H.W. Bush would do.
I know what George W. Bush would do.
Hell, I can even guess what Bill Clinton would do.

But, I can't begin to predict what Obama would or will do.
After all, it's only money.

Thomas Jefferson had the right idea.

Eisboch



I think it really stupid to assault a ship commanded by pirates when
the crews' lives are at stake. On the other hand, if there are pirates
approaching or leaving the ship, and they are not carrying hostages,
well, they are fair game. We obviously need to task some satellites to
watch the Somali coast and any small boats heading way offshore. We
can do that in real time, and dispatch naval aircraft to ward off any
small boats that get too close. We can do this at night, too.

What would George W. Bush do? Get a few thousand Americans killed.




I didn't say that. We don't need to put the crew of a captured ship at
further risk.
But, we can take action against the warlords that organize these attacks.

Eisboch


I'm confident our leader will handle this situation properly. The
captain did a brave thing. We need to pray for him.

Calif Bill April 9th 09 01:24 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy


AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's
captain. The plot thickens.



U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time


I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship
and line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that
if anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on
the rail will head to the sea.



Do you think the captains captors care? (say that fast three times)


Actually yes. They have to explain to the other people in the "village" why
they let the others hang. Same village, so they care.



Pittman Pirate April 9th 09 01:44 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy


AP now reporting that two of the *pirates* escaped with the ship's
captain. The plot thickens.



U.S. flagged vessels with union crews do get some training in repelling
boarders. I hope a deal can be made for the captain's life.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship
and line them up along the rail. Inform the ones with the captain that
if anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on
the rail will head to the sea.



Do you think the captains captors care? (say that fast three times)


Actually yes. They have to explain to the other people in the "village"
why they let the others hang. Same village, so they care.


Bill, I have a bridge for sale .................



Pittman Pirate April 9th 09 01:46 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Jim22208" wrote

I'm confident our leader will handle this situation properly. The captain
did a brave thing. We need to pray for him.


I am very interested in what "Fearless Leader" is going to do.

Why does "Rocky and Bullwinkle" come to mind?



Pittman Pirate April 9th 09 01:52 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Pittman Pirate" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


True. And to continue to send unarmed men into these situations in these
areas is plain stupidity. We have US naval vessels all over the globe
doing such things as jellyfish research, listening, and retesting
something they tested 2,000 times before. It would be nothing to station
vessels on patrol in that area of the world, and to handle these
situations as they come up. If a SEAL can't handle a skinny terrorist
with an antiquated RPG, he should turn in his flippers.


Haven't spent that much time in the blue water, huh?
Mighty small ships in gigantic oceans. We have ships patrolling
the normal shipping lanes, but this event happened about 300 miles
from the nearest Naval vessel according to the reports.
Furthermore, there were apparently about 150 cargo ships transiting
the general area at the time. Which do you protect?

Eisboch


Actually, spent eight years there, holding Leading AB status. Other
certifications and positions, but I digress. I do know that it is
Pollyannish to think that we can patrol every ship and every waterway.
Imagine sugar ants on the Superdome parking lot, and multiply the asphalt by
100,000.. During WW2, we had convoys, and the U boats still sank ships. I
was talking about situations where ships are seized, and action taken after
that. Maybe the knowledge would trickle down that if you attack a US
vessel, there will be a no nonsense response. A captain who drops anchor
(if in shallow water) or some other way disables his ship isn't going to
have to worry about some illiterate villager getting it under way. So they
sit there in a Mexican standoff.

Steve



Vic Smith April 9th 09 02:00 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:31:45 -0400, HK wrote:



I dunno, Vic. It seems when we use our brawn instead of our brains on
these failed states, we seem to make it easier for terrorists and despots.


A "failed state" is one that can freely harbor terrorists, pirates,
etc. Sometimes nothing works to instill order but brawn.
Using brains would mean getting the locals to use the brawn.
If you can, fine. But you'll still get blamed for the violence.

--Vic

Eisboch[_4_] April 9th 09 02:07 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Pittman Pirate" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Pittman Pirate" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.

True. And to continue to send unarmed men into these situations in
these areas is plain stupidity. We have US naval vessels all over the
globe doing such things as jellyfish research, listening, and retesting
something they tested 2,000 times before. It would be nothing to
station vessels on patrol in that area of the world, and to handle these
situations as they come up. If a SEAL can't handle a skinny terrorist
with an antiquated RPG, he should turn in his flippers.


Haven't spent that much time in the blue water, huh?
Mighty small ships in gigantic oceans. We have ships patrolling
the normal shipping lanes, but this event happened about 300 miles
from the nearest Naval vessel according to the reports.
Furthermore, there were apparently about 150 cargo ships transiting
the general area at the time. Which do you protect?

Eisboch


Actually, spent eight years there, holding Leading AB status. Other
certifications and positions, but I digress. I do know that it is
Pollyannish to think that we can patrol every ship and every waterway.
Imagine sugar ants on the Superdome parking lot, and multiply the asphalt
by 100,000.. During WW2, we had convoys, and the U boats still sank
ships. I was talking about situations where ships are seized, and action
taken after that. Maybe the knowledge would trickle down that if you
attack a US vessel, there will be a no nonsense response. A captain who
drops anchor (if in shallow water) or some other way disables his ship
isn't going to have to worry about some illiterate villager getting it
under way. So they sit there in a Mexican standoff.

Steve


I certainly go along with that.
Another option maybe is to have open village meetings and Obama can go over
and give his "Hope and Change" motivational speech and then answer
questions. Heck, it worked on millions here.

Eisboch



No Name April 9th 09 06:23 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to
defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad
50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer
shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to
strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates.
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy





jps April 9th 09 09:02 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:00:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:31:45 -0400, HK wrote:



I dunno, Vic. It seems when we use our brawn instead of our brains on
these failed states, we seem to make it easier for terrorists and despots.


A "failed state" is one that can freely harbor terrorists, pirates,
etc. Sometimes nothing works to instill order but brawn.
Using brains would mean getting the locals to use the brawn.
If you can, fine. But you'll still get blamed for the violence.

--Vic


Maybe we could offer them jobs - if we had any.

Eisboch[_4_] April 9th 09 10:02 AM

American crew retakes ship
 

wrote in message
m...
Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons
to defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with
quad 50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer
shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient
to strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates.
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy



I have searched around and haven't found a specific reference yet, but I
think there may be an international maritime law regarding the arming of
merchant vessels. Sidearms are ok, I think, but not a major weapons
system. I've found general references, but not anything that clearly
addresses the subject.

Eisboch




jim78565 April 9th 09 11:29 AM

American crew retakes ship
 
Pittman Pirate wrote:
"Jim22208" wrote

I'm confident our leader will handle this situation properly. The captain
did a brave thing. We need to pray for him.


I am very interested in what "Fearless Leader" is going to do.

Why does "Rocky and Bullwinkle" come to mind?


He needs a good man like Krause by his side to help guide him through
these troubled times. My guess is that he throws money at the situation
and hopes it goes away. Seriously though, I hope some of our elite
fighting forces,the NAVY Seals, are working as we speak, to free the
captain and make those pirates disappear forever.

[email protected] April 9th 09 01:19 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Apr 8, 6:00*pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


I would put a noose around all the pirates that are captured on the ship and
line them up along the rail. *Inform the ones with the captain that if
anything happens to the captain or they leave the area, the ones on the rail
will head to the sea.


I was watching Glenn Beck a while ago and for once he said something
that might have made sense.
"Where are the Marines?"
Keeping a fast reaction force in that area and just plain kicking ass
when an American flagged ship is touched would stop it cold.
Take no prisoners.
I got a feeling it won't be done because of crew safety and
"environmental" considerations.
Sticky problem. *The Mayaguez and Iran hostage situations are probably
studied to make these kinds of decisions.
Remember the Q-ships? *Merchant ships with hidden guns.
Maybe it was all a John Wayne movie.
Tripoli was assaulted to stop the pirates before.
Might take a land assault to stop it this time.
It's weird to think that 204 years after the Barbary pirates, we're
back to the same problem.
Actually, Somalia is less "civilized" than was Tripoli.
There was a leader of Tripoli to make peace with.


--Vic


The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.

--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


What an idiot! With your sentence above, you've quantified not only
the ship and it's contents, but you've quantified the worth of the
crew. So, do tell, what is that dollar amount?
It's funny that you think the crew of that ship has such great value,
but right here in this forum, you've wished death, misery, and ill
fortune on countless people.

Tim April 9th 09 04:25 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Apr 9, 12:23*am, wrote:
Simply train and arm the crew with 50 cal. and 20 m.m. automatic weapons to
defend themselves. A 20 m.m. Vulcan gatlin gun mounted amidships with quad
50's fore and aft would stop all the nonsense. As a former destroyer
shipmate, I assure you the firepower in the aforementioned is sufficient to
strike terror in the hearts of any so called Pirates."Eisboch" wrote in message

...





Betcha there are a few in Wash DC breathing a sigh of relief.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/piracy- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Agreed.

At least a couple Ma-deuces, and even mini-guns would help

Pittman Pirate April 9th 09 07:20 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


If the shipping companies value these men so much, why to they send them
unarmed into hostile waters? If they are so valued, why doesn't the US send
a team of SEALS in there and clean house? A few 50BMGs on a boat should
keep some skinny villagers away from a huge vessel with just some warning
snots.

If you read closely the descriptions of these crews, they are multinational
and one wonders how they all even communicate. They are probably the
futigives and derelicts of various nations. The main crew are skilled
people. The rest are just oilers and deckhands.




Calif Bill April 9th 09 08:07 PM

American crew retakes ship
 

"Pittman Pirate" wrote in message
...

wrote

The ship, its contents, and ransom money are just property, a commodity
much less valuable than the lives of the ship crews.


If the shipping companies value these men so much, why to they send them
unarmed into hostile waters? If they are so valued, why doesn't the US
send a team of SEALS in there and clean house? A few 50BMGs on a boat
should keep some skinny villagers away from a huge vessel with just some
warning snots.

If you read closely the descriptions of these crews, they are
multinational and one wonders how they all even communicate. They are
probably the futigives and derelicts of various nations. The main crew
are skilled people. The rest are just oilers and deckhands.




Another elitest. I had to laugh that the pirates in the home port were
saying they are sending out some armed boats to help the contained pirates.
Yup, lots of brain power. Go out with small arms weapons and not hostages
against ships that are armed to the teeth with really badass weapons.



Tim April 10th 09 03:56 AM

American crew retakes ship (update... sort of)
 

The "Now" Somalian gov'twants the international community to help
support the Somalian CoastGguard????

Now it sounds like they want the wolves to be hand fed too! ....

http://www.voanews.com/english/Afric...04-10-voa3.cfm

jim78565 April 10th 09 10:55 AM

American crew retakes ship (update... sort of)
 
Tim wrote:
The "Now" Somalian gov'twants the international community to help
support the Somalian CoastGguard????

Now it sounds like they want the wolves to be hand fed too! ....

http://www.voanews.com/english/Afric...04-10-voa3.cfm

I smell a rat. The pirates have collected a rather large Booty. Has the
Somali Govt. asked for their share of the plunder? The US Navy is on
scene ready to help the Somali Govt. rid their country of the pirates.
All we need from them is intel. and, as a diplomatic courtesy,
permission to do what's needed.

I am glad Mr. Obama has been kept informed of developments. How
embarrassing it would be if a US flagged ship was attacked and our
leader wasn't made privy to the measures being taken by our government.

Richard Casady April 10th 09 12:16 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:20:19 -0700, "Pittman Pirate"
wrote:

If you read closely the descriptions of these crews, they are multinational
and one wonders how they all even communicate. They are probably the
futigives and derelicts of various nations. The main crew are skilled
people. The rest are just oilers and deckhands.


The biggested freighter ever made has a crew of thirteen. The Emma
Maersk. The standard language of shipping is English. Oilers and
deckhands get scarce when the ship has a crew of fewer than 20. Modern
ships are so highly automated that there is nobody on deck or in the
engine room at night. This is not a new trend. A century ago they
built huge schooners in order to get by with smaller crews than
necessary for a square rigged ship. The seven masted schooner Thomas
Lawson had a crew of 18 plus a steam winch.

Casady

HK April 10th 09 12:39 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:20:19 -0700, "Pittman Pirate"
wrote:

If you read closely the descriptions of these crews, they are multinational
and one wonders how they all even communicate. They are probably the
futigives and derelicts of various nations. The main crew are skilled
people. The rest are just oilers and deckhands.


The biggested freighter ever made has a crew of thirteen. The Emma
Maersk. The standard language of shipping is English. Oilers and
deckhands get scarce when the ship has a crew of fewer than 20. Modern
ships are so highly automated that there is nobody on deck or in the
engine room at night. This is not a new trend. A century ago they
built huge schooners in order to get by with smaller crews than
necessary for a square rigged ship. The seven masted schooner Thomas
Lawson had a crew of 18 plus a steam winch.

Casady



A steam wench, eh? I guess she never got tired.



--
Palin & Bachmann in 2012 -
All Stupidity All the Time

Richard Casady April 10th 09 02:14 PM

American crew retakes ship
 
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:19:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

What an idiot! With your sentence above, you've quantified not only
the ship and it's contents, but you've quantified the worth of the
crew. So, do tell, what is that dollar amount?


When my stepson was jailed for drunk driving, the fools running the
place left him his belt, and once he was in a cell, he immediately
hanged himself. His life was worth 80 000 bucks.

Casady


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com