|
Tire plugs (was rain)
|
Tire plugs (was rain)
"Eisboch" wrote in
: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:39:48 -0400, wrote: Criminal Negligence. Many automobile liability claims arise out of criminally negligent behavior such as DUI or reckless driving. The insurance still pays. A short Google revealed several cases where insurance companies refused payment of benefits due to faulty equipment either as supplied by the manufacturer or serious faults or repairs needed that are known by the vehicle operator/owner. Our law expert is citing law, not insurance company policies which will vary from company to company. It doesn't mean, as he suggested, that the insurance company will prevail in a lawsuit for payment, but in some cases it may take that to get them to pay up. If he's really a lawyer, he knows that. Eisboch I do agree that insurance companies often manufacture reasons not to pay and it can be a pain to get what you contracted for. Maybe it's because I've made a few bucks suing them when they don't pay that I look it at from a different perspective. Don't get me wrong, I think patching a side-wall is penny-wise-pound foolishness and only an idiot would rely on insurance to cure the problem. Insurance doesn't bring back the dead. |
Tire plugs (was rain)
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:55:40 GMT, akheel
wrote: wrote in : On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:38:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:39:48 -0400, wrote: Criminal Negligence. Many automobile liability claims arise out of criminally negligent behavior such as DUI or reckless driving. The insurance still pays. A short Google revealed several cases where insurance companies refused payment of benefits due to faulty equipment either as supplied by the manufacturer or serious faults or repairs needed that are known by the vehicle operator/owner. Our law expert is citing law, not insurance company policies which will vary from company to company. It doesn't mean, as he suggested, that the insurance company will prevail in a lawsuit for payment, but in some cases it may take that to get them to pay up. If he's really a lawyer, he knows that. Eisboch You can be pretty certain he's not a lawyer. I usually don't get involved in flame wars, but you're just wrong. Highly doubful that I'm wrong. In usenet, the least credible way to win an argument already in progress is to start throwing around credentials. Only someone lacking real credentials tries that tactic, because it's just so lame. To come out of the chute boasting about your alleged law degree, you immediately lost the argument and labeled yourself as a fool. Your next move will no doubt be to tell us about cases you have won against insurance companies, or the work you did for the NHTSB. I hope you claim to have won cases against insurance companies, as that will only reinforce the point that insurance may not pay. If someone had to hire a lawyer and go to court in order to get paid, then what Eisboch said is borne out. |
Tire plugs (was rain)
wrote in :
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:55:40 GMT, akheel wrote: wrote in : On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:38:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message m... On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:39:48 -0400, wrote: Criminal Negligence. Many automobile liability claims arise out of criminally negligent behavior such as DUI or reckless driving. The insurance still pays. A short Google revealed several cases where insurance companies refused payment of benefits due to faulty equipment either as supplied by the manufacturer or serious faults or repairs needed that are known by the vehicle operator/owner. Our law expert is citing law, not insurance company policies which will vary from company to company. It doesn't mean, as he suggested, that the insurance company will prevail in a lawsuit for payment, but in some cases it may take that to get them to pay up. If he's really a lawyer, he knows that. Eisboch You can be pretty certain he's not a lawyer. I usually don't get involved in flame wars, but you're just wrong. Highly doubful that I'm wrong. In usenet, the least credible way to win an argument already in progress is to start throwing around credentials. Only someone lacking real credentials tries that tactic, because it's just so lame. To come out of the chute boasting about your alleged law degree, you immediately lost the argument and labeled yourself as a fool. Your next move will no doubt be to tell us about cases you have won against insurance companies, or the work you did for the NHTSB. I hope you claim to have won cases against insurance companies, as that will only reinforce the point that insurance may not pay. If someone had to hire a lawyer and go to court in order to get paid, then what Eisboch said is borne out. The fact that I'm an arogant, boastful, a-hole should prove without a doubt I'm a lawyer. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com