Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:56:34 -0400, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they are going. Idiot. Eisboch Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships, whether surface or subsurface? Nope. I am maintaining that the comment you made sounds like one of an idiot. Eisboch What rationalization would you offer up for two U.S. warships smacking into each other? I attributed it to asleep at the wheel. Conversing with an idiot is, well, idiotic. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When nerds collide... | General | |||
not a tall ship.. but does anyone recognise this 1940s ship? (link in message) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
But the water surface was still soft... | General | |||
gunnel surface | General | |||
Ships collide..............Rick, otn, Joe?? | ASA |