"HK" wrote in message
m...


Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat operators,
who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch

On Mar 20, 10:21*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...



Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat operators,
who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch

Indeed, that has to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever heard
an alleged grown man utter. In certainly shed light on just how much
he really DOES know about blue water boating!!!

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat
operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they
are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch


Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that
there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships, whether
surface or subsurface?

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat
operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they
are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch


Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that
there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships, whether
surface or subsurface?


Nope. I am maintaining that the comment you made sounds like one of an
idiot.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat
operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where
they are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch


Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that
there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships,
whether surface or subsurface?


Nope. I am maintaining that the comment you made sounds like one of an
idiot.

Eisboch


What rationalization would you offer up for two U.S. warships smacking
into each other? I attributed it to asleep at the wheel.

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:56:34 -0400, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...


Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat
operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where
they are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch


Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that
there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships,
whether surface or subsurface?


Nope. I am maintaining that the comment you made sounds like one of an
idiot.

Eisboch


What rationalization would you offer up for two U.S. warships smacking
into each other? I attributed it to asleep at the wheel.

Conversing with an idiot is, well, idiotic.

On Mar 20, 12:44*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...





Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news:LcydneMYyaBxOV7UnZ2dnUVZ_ryWnZ2d@earthlink. com...

Maybe our naval ships would be better "captained" by ferry boat
operators, who are usually sharp enough to pay attention to where they
are going.

Idiot.

Eisboch

Are you maintaining that naval warships steam about blindly, and that
there are not instruments on the bridge that detect other ships, whether
surface or subsurface?

Nope. * I am maintaining that the comment you made sounds like one of an
idiot.

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Again, you're right. He doesn't know anything. I take it the idiot
hasn't read up on current stealth technologies.