Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
from the stimulus bill, even if very few others do so.
http://tinyurl.com/cq3pes or: http://www.numbersusa.com/content/ne...an-workers.htm |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:01:52 -0500, John H
wrote: from the stimulus bill, even if very few others do so. http://tinyurl.com/cq3pes or: http://www.numbersusa.com/content/ne...an-workers.htm I got a response today from the White House. "Thank you for your message. On behalf of President Obama, we appreciate hearing from you. The President has promised the most transparent administration in history, and we're committed to listening to and responding to you. In order to better handle the millions of electronic messages we're receiving and respond more quickly, we've implemented a new contact form on our website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Please note that this web form has replaced . That email address is no longer monitored, so we encourage you to resubmit your message through the link above. Thank you for using the web form and helping us improve communications with you. Sincerely, The Presidential Correspondence Team" Don't know yet, but this might be a way to sideline the system numbersusa uses to send faxes. We'll see. My congress critters don't even respond. But they're in the pocket of the "open borders" Chamber of Commerce crowd anyway. --Vic |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:31:36 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:01:52 -0500, John H wrote: from the stimulus bill, even if very few others do so. http://tinyurl.com/cq3pes or: http://www.numbersusa.com/content/ne...an-workers.htm I got a response today from the White House. "Thank you for your message. On behalf of President Obama, we appreciate hearing from you. The President has promised the most transparent administration in history, and we're committed to listening to and responding to you. In order to better handle the millions of electronic messages we're receiving and respond more quickly, we've implemented a new contact form on our website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Please note that this web form has replaced . That email address is no longer monitored, so we encourage you to resubmit your message through the link above. Thank you for using the web form and helping us improve communications with you. Sincerely, The Presidential Correspondence Team" Don't know yet, but this might be a way to sideline the system numbersusa uses to send faxes. We'll see. My congress critters don't even respond. But they're in the pocket of the "open borders" Chamber of Commerce crowd anyway. --Vic I couldn't get the link you provided to work either. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:30:47 -0500, John H
wrote: I couldn't get the link you provided to work either. This works for me http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ But numbersusa has the best process because they cogently lay out the issues in the ready-made text, and have the "buffet." I always add my comments in the p.s. If this new WH method short circuits numbersusa, it's not good. --Vic |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:41:42 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:30:47 -0500, John H wrote: I couldn't get the link you provided to work either. This works for me http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ But numbersusa has the best process because they cogently lay out the issues in the ready-made text, and have the "buffet." I always add my comments in the p.s. If this new WH method short circuits numbersusa, it's not good. --Vic Weird. With Mozilla all I get is a blank screen with the White House emblem at the top of the page. With Internet Explorer I get the contacts page. I asked him why the E-Verify provisions were removed from the bill if it's purpose was to provide jobs for Americans. We'll see... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|