BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Ride to hell (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/102506-ride-hell.html)

Don White February 12th 09 02:45 AM

Ride to hell
 
Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night, I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.



[email protected] February 12th 09 01:47 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 11, 9:45*pm, "Don White" wrote:
Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. *If his plane comes in at night, I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:

1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?

[email protected] February 12th 09 01:58 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 8:47*am, wrote:
On Feb 11, 9:45*pm, "Don White" wrote:

Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km..
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. *If his plane comes in at night, I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:

1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk

Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.

Don White February 12th 09 02:07 PM

Ride to hell
 

wrote in message
...
On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:
Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:

1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?

************************************************** *********************

mmmmm "Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?"
As talented and multi-tasking as I am...that would be difficult even for me.

A Continental flight from Newark landed just before my buddies United
flight.
Just who do you think pilots United Airlines planes...pilots from Iran??

Last night the plane re-fulled in Hartford Conn and then took the passengers
all the way back to Washington.
This morning an early flight to here was cancelled so United offered to send
the passengers to Chicago..... Say what??
Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST



Don White February 12th 09 03:09 PM

Ride to hell
 

wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 8:47 am, wrote:
On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My
eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:

1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk

Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.

************************************************** ******************************************

Not so much scared, NumbNuts.... as I said, I have trouble seeing while
driving at night... much worse in rainy or foggy weather.
In a light snowstorm..I'd have no problem.



[email protected] February 12th 09 05:01 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 9:07*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:





Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km..
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:

1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?

************************************************** *********************

mmmmm "Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?"
As talented and multi-tasking as I am...that would be difficult even for me.


Really? Too dumb to apply the brakes and park next to the beer store?

A Continental flight from Newark landed just before my buddies United
flight.
Just who do you think pilots United Airlines planes...pilots from Iran??


Um, pilots come from all over, dummy. He could well have been from
just about any country. Do you really think that a global airline such
as United only employes U.S. pilots?????

As for the rest, you either didn't or couldn't answer the questions.
Care to try again?


[email protected] February 12th 09 05:02 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 10:09*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 12, 8:47 am, wrote:





On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My
eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:


1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk

Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.

************************************************** *******************************************

Not so much scared, NumbNuts.... as I said, I have trouble seeing while
driving at night... much worse in rainy or foggy weather.
In a light snowstorm..I'd have no problem.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

Don White February 12th 09 06:11 PM

Ride to hell
 

wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 10:09 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 12, 8:47 am, wrote:





On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a
bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even
60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My
eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown
hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:


1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk

Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.

************************************************** *******************************************

Not so much scared, NumbNuts.... as I said, I have trouble seeing while
driving at night... much worse in rainy or foggy weather.
In a light snowstorm..I'd have no problem.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

************************************************** *************************************

Speaking of transportation...how do you ship your 'special crop'?
Air, rail, truck??



[email protected] February 12th 09 06:50 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 1:11*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 12, 10:09 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message


....
On Feb 12, 8:47 am, wrote:


On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a
bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even
60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My
eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this..
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown
hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:


1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk


Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.


************************************************** ********************************************


Not so much scared, NumbNuts.... as I said, I have trouble seeing while
driving at night... much worse in rainy or foggy weather.
In a light snowstorm..I'd have no problem.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

************************************************** **************************************

Speaking of transportation...how do you ship your 'special crop'?
Air, rail, truck??- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

[email protected] February 12th 09 06:51 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 1:11*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 12, 10:09 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message


....
On Feb 12, 8:47 am, wrote:


On Feb 11, 9:45 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to
arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a
bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even
60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My
eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this..
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and
then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night,
I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown
hotel.
Safer for all concerned.


You're acting more like your lover/master/clone Harry every day.
Please answer the following:


1. How do you know that the pilot was American?
2. By "'merican" did you mean the United States?
3. While the pilot has ultimate control, do you think it was his
decision alone to not land at Halifax?
4. Do you really think that a well trained pilot should put his
passengers, crew, and expensive plane at risk just so some idiot in
Halifax won't call him "whimpy"?
5. Did you fetch your son beer while you were out?


Yeah, funny.. He wants the pilot to land, but he's scared to drive to
the Airport a second day...;) snerk


Wouldn't it be interesting if it was a Canadian Pilot.. Only our
Donnie or Harry would be dumb enough (or dishonest enough) to make a
blind assumption like that.


************************************************** ********************************************


Not so much scared, NumbNuts.... as I said, I have trouble seeing while
driving at night... much worse in rainy or foggy weather.
In a light snowstorm..I'd have no problem.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

************************************************** **************************************

Speaking of transportation...how do you ship your 'special crop'?
Air, rail, truck??- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Just like Harry, when you've finally figured out you don't have a
friggin' clue what you're talking about, deflect......

Don White February 12th 09 07:54 PM

Ride to hell
 

wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.



HK February 12th 09 10:41 PM

Ride to hell
 
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.





We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. :)

Don White February 12th 09 11:41 PM

Ride to hell
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated
if I admitted knowledge of same.




We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't discuss
being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. :)


Pot?? I thought he was growing peanuts. ;-)



HK February 12th 09 11:49 PM

Ride to hell
 
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated
if I admitted knowledge of same.



We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't discuss
being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. :)


Pot?? I thought he was growing peanuts. ;-)



Was it peanuts...or a penis?

Don White February 13th 09 12:31 AM

Ride to hell
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on
a public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being
implicated if I admitted knowledge of same.


We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. :)


Pot?? I thought he was growing peanuts. ;-)


Was it peanuts...or a penis?



LOL.. that's another good 'un.



[email protected] February 13th 09 03:32 AM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 5:41*pm, HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
....
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?


************************************************** ************************


You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.


We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. * :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


So, you admit you made it up.. Just like the Lobsta' boat, Yale, Dr.
Dr., Singlehanded..., Fireboat welcome, don't shop at Walmart, Stumpy
isn't your gay lover, pictures of owls and harpies, you are not even
good at lying...

HK February 13th 09 03:40 AM

Ride to hell
 
wrote:
On Feb 12, 5:41 pm, HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?
************************************************** ************************
You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.

We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


So, you admit you made it up.. Just like the Lobsta' boat, Yale, Dr.
Dr., Singlehanded..., Fireboat welcome, don't shop at Walmart, Stumpy
isn't your gay lover, pictures of owls and harpies, you are not even
good at lying...




Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh.

[email protected] February 13th 09 01:19 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 5:41*pm, HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
....
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?


************************************************** ************************


You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.


We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.

Never happened. * :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


What are you accusing me of, coward?

[email protected] February 13th 09 01:20 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 7:31*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:_o6dnYojCdgYOAnUnZ2dnUVZ_gmWnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?


************************************************** ************************


You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on
a public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being
implicated if I admitted knowledge of same.


We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.


Never happened. * :)


Pot?? * I thought he was growing peanuts. *;-)


Was it peanuts...or a penis?


LOL.. that's another good 'un.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You just love when your lover/master/clone comes up with that third
grade trash don't you?

[email protected] February 13th 09 01:22 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 7:31*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:_o6dnYojCdgYOAnUnZ2dnUVZ_gmWnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?


************************************************** ************************


You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on
a public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being
implicated if I admitted knowledge of same.


We all know he didn't discuss growing pot, just as JustHate didn't
discuss being slammed against the staircase by the local cops.


Never happened. * :)


Pot?? * I thought he was growing peanuts. *;-)


Was it peanuts...or a penis?


LOL.. that's another good 'un.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hey, dummy, did you hear about the commuter jet that went down in
Buffalo? Seems there was rain, fog, snow. The pilot radioed some icing
before going off the radar. Still think the pilot you are referring to
was a coward because he valued his, his crew and his passengers lives?

[email protected] February 13th 09 01:23 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 12, 2:54*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
Another classic example of crap just popping into your head without
ANY evidence.
Just what in hell are you talking about? Have the balls to continue,
will you?

************************************************** ************************

You want me to discuss your questionable activities and transactions on a
public forum?
One of the jailhouse lawyers in here might accuse me of being implicated if
I admitted knowledge of same.


Yes, I do. Accuse me of anything you like. Just be ready to suffer the
consequences of your liable and lies.

Don White February 13th 09 02:24 PM

Ride to hell
 

wrote in message
...

Hey, dummy, did you hear about the commuter jet that went down in
Buffalo? Seems there was rain, fog, snow. The pilot radioed some icing
before going off the radar. Still think the pilot you are referring to
was a coward because he valued his, his crew and his passengers lives?


Oh boy... you still going on about that?
All right...I admit I threw in that comment to troll the usual rabid
patriots.
I expected to see 'Captain America' aka Waylon Smithers, to come rushing to
the defense of the US.
Guess he's out learning to photograph 'by number'.



Richard Casady February 13th 09 02:45 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?


The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady

[email protected] February 13th 09 03:15 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 13, 9:45*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?


The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady


An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.

Richard Casady February 13th 09 09:52 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 13, 9:45*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?


The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady


An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.


What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady

[email protected] February 13th 09 10:26 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 13, 4:52*pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 13, 9:45*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"


wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?


The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.


Casady


An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.


What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


So this autopilot, when it's over the weather knows what the weather
below is like? It knows windshear values at the runway apron? It knows
runway conditions? It knows the tower's recommendations? Answers NO.
Hell an airport can be completely closed and if left to it's own, the
autopilot will still try to land there.

Richard Casady February 14th 09 04:40 AM

Ride to hell
 
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:26:02 -0800 (PST), wrote:

So this autopilot, when it's over the weather knows what the weather
below is like? The conditions are continuously broadcast on the radio


No reason why an autopilot can't listen. I have been flying for almost
fifty years, and I can assure you it is not that difficult, even in
nearly all weather. Icing is the killer. Airline plane crashed and
burned today, killed one victim on the ground. It was ice coated. If
the plane makes it to the airport there are usually survivors, even if
it burns, but not this time.

That Hudson river landing was something. Those guys do not practice
power off approaches and landings, and with any glider, you only get
one chance, and the jets are moving fast, with a high sink rate when
they land. Power off is very difficult to judge. Only good thing about
the river was it was effectively infinitely long. Power off is not
even on the airline transport rating check ride. One engine out on a
multi is what they test for. One guy did get a single engine ATR. For
an emergency they steadily reduced the power, to simulate accumulating
ice. Stay in the air ten minutes., think fast. With ships, things take
place with glacial slowness, although occasionally they explode.

Casady.

[email protected] February 14th 09 02:17 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 13, 11:40*pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:26:02 -0800 (PST), wrote:
So this autopilot, when it's over the weather knows what the weather
below is like? The conditions are continuously broadcast on the radio


No reason why an autopilot can't listen. I have been flying for almost
fifty years, and I can assure you it is not that difficult, even in
nearly all weather. Icing is the killer. Airline plane crashed and
burned today, killed one victim on the ground. It was ice coated. If
the plane makes it to the airport there are usually survivors, even if
it burns, but not this time.

That Hudson river landing was something. Those guys do not practice
power off approaches and landings, and with any glider, you only get
one chance, and the jets are moving fast, with a high sink rate when
they land. Power off is very difficult to judge. Only good thing about
the river was it was effectively infinitely long. Power off is not
even on the airline transport rating check ride. One engine out on a
multi is what they test for. One guy did get a single engine ATR. For
an emergency they steadily reduced the power, to simulate accumulating
ice. Stay in the air ten minutes., think fast. With ships, things take
place with glacial slowness, although occasionally they explode.

Casady.


In western NY, icing is a problem a lot of the year. Then you have to
figure out whether to try to climb above the conditions, or descend
below or at least down to higher temps. If you do that, then theirs
these things called hills that can ruin your day!

Richard Casady February 14th 09 04:05 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Casady

[email protected] February 14th 09 05:09 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Feb 14, 11:05*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Casady


I really like Polish food!

Richard Casady February 14th 09 06:05 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:01:20 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Um, pilots come from all over, dummy. He could well have been from
just about any country. Do you really think that a global airline such
as United only employes U.S. pilots?????


At one time there were lots of US pilots all over the world. We had a
zillion cheap light planes and a big military to do the training.

Casady

Don White February 14th 09 06:17 PM

Ride to hell
 

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Casady



The Bullet?
Would that be the Newfie Bullet that ran from St. John's to Port aux
Basques, Newfoundland...................
or was there a Bullet that ran from Saint John, New Brunswick to Toronto?



Vic Smith February 14th 09 07:08 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:05:51 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Stefan Batory? I'm going aboard one of those to get to Europe in the
next few years - I hope.
I don't fly either. Can pick the ship up close to home, travel part
of my old merchant marine route through the lakes, then right across
the pond.
BTW, one of the Cunard Queens - can't remember if it's the Mary -
isn't bad on price, but you have to pick it up on the east coast.
Polish food is mostly meat and potatoes based. If the cook is good,
it'll be good. As long as you're not a vegan.

--Vic

Richard Casady February 14th 09 09:09 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:17:59 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Richard Casady" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Casady



The Bullet?
Would that be the Newfie Bullet that ran from St. John's to Port aux
Basques, Newfoundland...................
or was there a Bullet that ran from Saint John, New Brunswick to Toronto?


I read a book by a young Canadian, who did the battle of the Atlantic.
He served first on the Halifax net tender, then an AMC, then a
corvette. And they called it the Newfie Bullet. The name could have
been used for more than one train. He meant a twenty four 'express' to
Toronto. I could be wrong about the Eastern end.

Casady


Richard Casady February 14th 09 09:24 PM

Ride to hell
 
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:08:25 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:05:51 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:54 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

Vic changed his route to Boston where he can pickup an Air Canada flight
that will get him here somewhere around 1900 hrs AST


All Canadians want you to make it to Halifax, while the US could care
less, it seems. Transportation is better than it once was. During the
war there was a supposedly express train from St John to Toronto. It
was supposed to take 24 hours and always took more than 48. They
derisively called it the ' Bullet '.We don't do airline: we plan to
take a train and a boxboat to Amsterdam when the ice goes out. It
leaves Lake Michigan every two weeks. I wonder what the food is like,
the ship is Polish..

Stefan Batory? I'm going aboard one of those to get to Europe in the
next few years - I hope.
I don't fly either. Can pick the ship up close to home, travel part
of my old merchant marine route through the lakes, then right across
the pond.
BTW, one of the Cunard Queens - can't remember if it's the Mary -
isn't bad on price, but you have to pick it up on the east coast.
Polish food is mostly meat and potatoes based. If the cook is good,
it'll be good. As long as you're not a vegan.


Queen Mary. Rode it from Hamburg to Brooklyn, via Southhampton.
I think they are getting 700 or so for two to a room. The room service
burger is not as good as Holland-America. The latter have a bar
directly above the wheelhouse, with three glass walls. A hundred a
day. Compare touring by car. Hundred a day for room, seventy five to a
hundred for gas, twenty to thirty for food. Took the train from NYC to
Iowa. Spotted several steam locomotives, sitting derelict in yards.

Casady

CalifBill February 15th 09 02:14 AM

Ride to hell
 

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 13, 9:45 am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady


An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.


What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady


The reason they do not allow the autopilot to land all the way to touchdown
is because of the ILS system. You cannot always trust it is in perfect
alignment. It can be a little off, but not far enough to trigger the
alarms. Maybe now, but when I was an ILS guy in the airforce, you could
still be off a tiny bit.



Mike[_10_] February 15th 09 03:23 AM

Ride to hell
 

"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 13, 9:45 am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady

An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.


What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady


The reason they do not allow the autopilot to land all the way to
touchdown is because of the ILS system. You cannot always trust it is in
perfect alignment. It can be a little off, but not far enough to trigger
the alarms. Maybe now, but when I was an ILS guy in the airforce, you
could still be off a tiny bit.


Actually Bill, if the plane (with qualified crew), and the airport are
equipped properly, the autopilot can complete a fully automated landing all
the way thru roll-out. It's called a CAT-III C approach, and of many
reports I've heard, is smoother than many pilot's landings. SFO is capable
of handling such approaches. Maybe scary, but true.

--Mike



Calif Bill February 16th 09 06:39 AM

Ride to hell
 

"Mike" wrote in message
...

"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 13, 9:45 am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady

An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.

What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady


The reason they do not allow the autopilot to land all the way to
touchdown is because of the ILS system. You cannot always trust it is in
perfect alignment. It can be a little off, but not far enough to trigger
the alarms. Maybe now, but when I was an ILS guy in the airforce, you
could still be off a tiny bit.


Actually Bill, if the plane (with qualified crew), and the airport are
equipped properly, the autopilot can complete a fully automated landing
all the way thru roll-out. It's called a CAT-III C approach, and of many
reports I've heard, is smoother than many pilot's landings. SFO is capable
of handling such approaches. Maybe scary, but true.

--Mike


But I got out in 1971, so things have definitely changed technology wise.



Mike[_10_] February 16th 09 04:57 PM

Ride to hell
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"Mike" wrote in message
...

"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:15:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 13, 9:45 am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:11:10 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I'm sure the pilot had perfect visibility in the rain, fog and snow,
he was just scared....right, dummy?

The pilot is the necessary backup for the autopilot, which can land
the plane, and which does not use visible light and does not need
visibility. Rain and fog do not affect it. The pilot might have taken
the risk had there been a medical emergency or something.

Casady

An autopilot system can't make decisions based on deteriorating
weather conditions. A pilot can, and therefore did.

What makes you think it can't, for that matter. Computers can beat
nearly anyone at chess, and have been able to for a long time.

As far back as 1947 an autopilot on a DC-3 crossed the Atlantic and
landed with a pilot watching, hands off. The radio glide slope
instrument had been invented by then. There is even a book about it.

You missed the part about the autopilot being immune to weather. If
you trust the autopilot, there is no decision to make, you land every
time. They don't trust the autopilot. which is what I said. Pilots are
not failure proof either. They occasionally die on the job. That is
one of the reasons there are two. The Shuttle is totally unlandable
without the computer, so they have four of them. Two can fail in
succession and be outvoted. I happen to hold, since the seventies, a
commercial license with an instrument rating, and I can assure you
that neither approaches nor landings have to be perfect.

Casady

The reason they do not allow the autopilot to land all the way to
touchdown is because of the ILS system. You cannot always trust it is
in perfect alignment. It can be a little off, but not far enough to
trigger the alarms. Maybe now, but when I was an ILS guy in the
airforce, you could still be off a tiny bit.


Actually Bill, if the plane (with qualified crew), and the airport are
equipped properly, the autopilot can complete a fully automated landing
all the way thru roll-out. It's called a CAT-III C approach, and of many
reports I've heard, is smoother than many pilot's landings. SFO is
capable of handling such approaches. Maybe scary, but true.

--Mike


But I got out in 1971, so things have definitely changed technology wise.


LOL! OK, it's safe to say that approach was not available in 1971.

--Mike



D K[_8_] February 22nd 09 03:16 AM

Ride to hell
 
Don White wrote:
Just got back from the airport.
My BVI buddy was on a flight out of Washington that was scheduled to arrive
Halifax at 2108 hrs.
When I started out, I had to wipe a skim of ice from the windows...a bad
sign. Talk about pea soup fog......
I was travelling at 80km and sometimes dipping down to 70 and even 60km.
Big trucks whipping by kicking up crap all over my windshield. My eyesight
is getting bad at night in the best conditions, let alone like this.
Oh yeah..that wimpy 'merican pilot circled our airport a few times and then
ran back toHartford, Connecticut.
Now I'll have to go back out tomorrow. If his plane comes in at night, I'll
tell him to jump the airport bus and I'll meet him at a downtown hotel.
Safer for all concerned.



So you are dumb *and* a pussy. Go figure...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com