On Feb 3, 7:06*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:





On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. *He didn't say "eliminate". * He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. *He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, he sure had fun with "Stumpy" before he stole a picture of a
piece of wood to defray the jokes

On Feb 3, 7:09 pm, wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:06 pm, Frogwatch wrote:



On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:

On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, he sure had fun with "Stumpy" before he stole a picture of a
piece of wood to defray the jokes

I resisted the urge to point out what "working stiff" he is most
familiar with.

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

--

"Every normal man must be tempted at times
to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag,
and begin to slit throats."

H. L. Mencken

On Feb 3, 2:41*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. *I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. *As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Daschle and the Dems are practicing the "Screw everyone else, I got
mine" principle.

HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I
cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


WAFA's way out there...

HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I
cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


Go ahead and follow through on your threat. Or, is this another one of
your lies.

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be
withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors,
Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder
if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math
challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof,
I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than
bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal
dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?


Go ahead and follow through on your threat. Or, is this another one of
your lies.



What threat, ****-for-brains?

You know, if you stayed in school, someone might have taught you to read.

On Feb 3, 11:50*am, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. *

--Vic

NEXT!

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote:


Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

My guess is that he is done. You overlook the fact that Dashle would
have been approved by the Senate. He withdrew because he was a
distraction. He's a distraction now, and he would be a distraction a
month from now.

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:17 +0000, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:39:36 -0500, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

Over/under?

Two weeks.

Daschle is done, but it does make an opening for Howard Dean.